Given a system with 64KByte of physical memory. The operating system with its data structures consumes 16KByte of memory. There are two processes in the system. One process with 19KByte of code and 15KByte of data, and the other with 15KByte of code and 8KByte of data. For each of the following memory methods can both processes reside entirely in memory? 1. Segmentation with division into 2KByte pages. Can/can't the processes reside fully in memory? explanation. 2. Segmentation without division into pages. Can/can't the processes reside fully in memory? explanation.

Given a system with 64KByte of physical memory. The operating system with its data structures consumes 16KByte of memory. There are two processes in the system. One process with 19KByte of code and 15KByte of data, and the other with 15KByte of code and 8KByte of data. For each of the following memory methods can both processes reside entirely in memory? 1. Segmentation with division into 2KByte pages. Can/can't the processes reside fully in memory? explanation. 2. Segmentation without division into pages. Can/can't the processes reside fully in memory? explanation.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Simulated annealing requires a very small amount of memory, just enough to store two states: the current state and the proposed next state. Suppose we had enough memory to hold two million states. Propose a modification to simulated annealing that makes productive use of the additional memory. In particular, suggest something that will likely perform better than just running simulated annealing a million times consecutively with random restarts. [Note: There are multiple correct answers here.]
Consider a computer whose RAM has the following memory partition: 4K, 8K, 20K, 2K. At time T, a snapshot of the process queue is taken and is given below. Queue Head Tail Process PO P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 Memory 2K 14K 3K 6K 6K 10K 7K 20K Usage time 4ms 10ms 2ms 8ms 4ms 1ms 8ms 6ms If the processes are allocated using FCFS algorithm with best-fit memory allocation, calculate the time at which P6 finishes its execution. Assume there is no additional time overhead for allocating these processes.
Consider there are five (5) memory partitions in computer. The memory blocks are of sizes 180 MB, 500 MB, 350 MB, 280 MB, 600 MB. Use the memory partition allocation methods to find the first-fit to place the processes of size 200 MB, 300 MB, 350 MB, and 400 MB? Find the algorithm which makes the best use of the memory? First Fit Process Process Size Block No P1 200 P2 300 P3 350 P4 400
In the above, we had the three concurrent processes p1, p2 and p3, each with the number s1 = 2, s2 = 3 and s3 = 2 of states, respectively.
A disk has a capacity of two tera-byte size. Say the file system uses a multi-level inode structure for locating the data blocks of afile.The inode stores pointers to data blocks, including a single indirect block, a double indirect block, and several direct blocks in the 64 B of available space.Now, it is given that the disk has a block size of 512 B. The maximum file size that can be stored in such a file system in MB (round off upto 2 decimal places).
Suppose your system has a memory of size 100 MB using contiguous memory allocations and there are 4 fixed size partitions. Partition one of size 50, partition 2 of size 200, partition 3 of size 100 and partition 4 of size 150 Consider First 5 letters of your name. The ASCII code of the letters is the size of process and the alphabet is the name of process. The processes appear in alphabetical order. Q= How many processes will be loaded in the memory at a time? For contiguous memory allocation show the algorithms used to allocate memory partitions to each process and state which algorithm will work best and why? Also state the amount of internal and external fragmentation for the processes and partitions after allocation NOTE :MY NAME IS ALIZAHID
Consider a computer environment in which there are 4 magnetic drives, 2 printers, 3 scanners, and 1 optical drive. Three processes P1, P2, P3 are using these resources. At any point in time, the allocations and requests for these resources are as follows. Allocations: Magnetic drive Printer Scanner Optical drive P1 1 P2 2 1 P3 1 Requests: Magnetic drive 2 Printer Scanner Optical drive P1 1 P2 1 1 P3 2 1 Is there any way that the processes can complete without deadlock? If yes, explain how. If not, explain why not.
Let I represent an execution of init(s), W of wait(s), and S of signal(s). Then, for example, IWWS represents the sequence of calls init(s), wait(s), wait(s), and signal(s) by some processes in an operating system. For each of the following sequences of calls, state the value of s and the number of processes blocked after the last call in the sequence: *(a) IW (b) IS (c) ISSSW (d) IWWWS (e) ISWWWW
Suppose that DS=1000H, SS= 2000H, CS=3000H, ES=4000H, BP=FFH, BX=FFFFH and DI=5H.i. Which memory locations are addressed by: MOV DL, [BP]?ii. Which memory locations are addressed by: MOV EAX, [BX+DI]?
Given memory partitions of 100K, 600K, 400K, 500K, and 300K (inorder), howwould each of the First-fit, Best-fit, and Worst-fitalgorithms place processes of 117K, 412K, 325K, and 510K (inorder)?
Consider a system consisting of 5 processes, P = {P1, P2, P3, P4, P5} and 3 resources types, R = {R1, R2, R3}. The number of instances for each resource type are 2, 2 and 1 respectively. The state of the system at time, it is described as follow: P1 requests an instance of R2 P2 requests an instance of R1 P3 requests an instance of R2 and holds an instance of R1 and an instance of R3 P4 requests an instance of R3 P5 holds all instances of R2 Assuming that all resources are non-sharable, construct a Resource Allocation Graph to depict the process state.
In a timesharing OS we have the following cpu timeline for two tasks X and Y. The timeslice is 1s.Both tasks are available in the system at the same time t=9:00:00.000 and order of arrival is the obviousX followed by Y. (The decimals reflect milliseconds if they showup in an indicated time reference.) There are no other processes (tasks) in the system other than X,Y. 1234567890 XYXYX--YXY The time line 1 indicates that at t=9:00:00s task X starts its execution and when t=9:00:01s is reached task Y takes over. The time line 1 indicates the 'first second' and time line 0 indicates the 'tenth second' above.Task Y completes its execution at t=9:00:10s, the completion of the tenth second since X started its execution. Task X has completed its execution earlier. (a) What is the total number of context switches starting from prior to t=9:00:00s (e.g. t=8:59:59.999) through thecompletion of $Y$? answer is 16s (b) What is the turnaround time for Y? answer is 10s (c) What is…