Extending the scope of the project and introducing features that aren't essential are two bad consequences that might occur. Explaining the distinctions between the two ideas will make it easier for your audience to understand your position. I would like you to comment on how you arrived at the conclusion that the underlying cause of these two problems was the same. In the event that these two things took place while we were working on this project, what type of disaster may possibly result?

Extending the scope of the project and introducing features that aren't essential are two bad consequences that might occur. Explaining the distinctions between the two ideas will make it easier for your audience to understand your position. I would like you to comment on how you arrived at the conclusion that the underlying cause of these two problems was the same. In the event that these two things took place while we were working on this project, what type of disaster may possibly result?

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

This might result in either feature creep or scope creep, both of which are undesirable. Explain to everyone how the two concepts are distinct from one another so that they may comprehend your explanation. In what ways do you believe these two problems stem from the same source? In the event that these two unpleasant events take place while working on this project, how disastrous may the situation become?
Both feature creep and scope creep are bad outcomes that might arise from this. Provide a clear description of the differences between the two ideas so that your audience can follow along. Please explain how you arrive at the conclusion that the root cause of these two issues is the same. How awful would it be if these two unwelcome circumstances occurred while working on this project?
Adding superfluous features or increasing the project's scope are two bad results. Describe the distinctions between the two concepts to aid your audience in understanding your argument. Please explain how you came to the conclusion that the underlying cause of these two problems is the same. What kind of catastrophe may be precipitated if these two events occurred while working on this project?
This might lead to scope creep or feature creep, both of which are negative outcomes. Help the listeners understand your point by describing the differences between the two ideas. Please explain how you arrive at the conclusion that the root cause of these two issues is the same. When working on this project, how awful would it be if these two things happened?
Scope creep and feature creep are both possible outcomes of this. Describe the differences between the two ideas so that everyone can understand them. What do you think the root of these two issues is? How bad may things go if these two unwelcome circumstances arise throughout the course of this project?
It is essential to provide a case study that indicates how the students were successful in achieving the goals of their project. The following options are up to you to choose from: Discussions about the results c. the very last word Introduction; or, the abstract?
Both scope creep and feature creep are consequences of this. Clarify the contrast between the two ideas for the reader. Please explain the root of these two issues. When these two problems arise, what is the worst that may happen with this project?
Increasing the project's scope or adding unnecessary features are both undesirable outcomes. Help your reader grasp your point by outlining the differences between the two ideas. Please elaborate on your reasoning for assuming that the same issue underlies both of these complaints. If these two things happened while working on this project, what type of disaster might it cause?
For the sake of the project's success and quality, please provide three arguments in favor of placing more emphasis on architectural design than on lower-level design and implementation. We'll go into these justifications in a little.
If you're doing user research, why not do it this way instead of breaking down the overall design into numerous separate perspectives?
Some possible results are expanding the scope or adding new features. Give some examples to show how the two ideas are different from each other. Can you shed some light on how these two problems started? What would happen if the two worst things that could happen with this attempt happened at the same time?
Expanding the scope or adding features may occur. Give specific instances to contrast the concepts. How can you explain these two issues? What if these two bad things occurred at once, ruining this project?