Two countries the US (U) and Fiji (F). Each country i E {U, F} can decide whether to impose a positive tax on the emissions of its polluting firms (t;> 0) or to impose no tax (t; = 0). We can think of a representative firm that chooses whether to produce using a polluting technology (q = P) or a clean technology (q = C). The polluting technology generates profits of (P) = 11. The clean technology generates profits of л(P) = 10 and doesn't have to pay tax. Imposing a tax of t = 1, profits of firms using polluting technology would equal profits of firms using clean. Assume that when the firm is indifferent between the two technologies, it chooses the clean technology. technology. Let us now turn to the decisions that the governments would make if they were inde- pendently choosing whether to impose a tax or not. In the US, firms using the clean technology emit a total of 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting technology emit a total of 900 tonnes of CO2 emissions. In Fiji, firms using the clean technology emit 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting technology emit 100 tonnes of CO2 emissions. The governments of each country care about three things: (1) how much net profits their representative firm makes, (2) how many total CO2 emissions are emitted in the world, and (3) how much tax income they receive. In particular, let Ti(qi) denote the profits of the representative firm in country i when it chooses technology qi and E(qu, qF) = Eu (qu)+Ef(qf) the total CO2 emissions in the world. Then each country's payoffs are given by: Uu (qu, qF, E) 1000 × [TU (qu) — TU] − E(qu, qF) + 1000 × TU UF (qu,qF, E) = πF(qF) — TF – 100 × E(qu,qF) + TF - Ti = 2 and no tax Suppose that each country can choose between a lump-sum tax of Ti = 0. Countries can only impose taxes on their own firms, not on the firms of the other countries. 1. Using the firm's behaviour given different tax levels, calculate the profit and emissions under the following scenarios. (a) Only the US imposes a tax: TU (b) Only Fiji imposes a tax: Tf = 2, tu = 0. (c) Both countries impose a tax: Tu = TF = 2. (d) Neither country imposes a tax: TU = TF = 0. = : 2, TF = 0. 2. Using these results, Represent the interaction between the two governments as a static game: who are the players, what are their actions, and what are the payoffs (you should use a table to show the payoffs)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Two countries the US (U) and Fiji (F). Each country i E {U, F} can decide whether to impose a
positive tax on the emissions of its polluting firms (t;> 0) or to impose no tax (t; = 0). We can think
of a representative firm that chooses whether to produce using a polluting technology (q = P) or a
clean technology (q = C). The polluting technology generates profits of (P) = 11. The clean
technology generates profits of л(P) = 10 and doesn't have to pay tax. Imposing a tax of t = 1,
profits of firms using polluting technology would equal profits of firms using clean. Assume that
when the firm is indifferent between the two technologies, it chooses the clean technology.
technology.
Let us now turn to the decisions that the governments would make if they were inde-
pendently choosing whether to impose a tax or not. In the US, firms using the clean
technology emit a total of 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting
technology emit a total of 900 tonnes of CO2 emissions. In Fiji, firms using the clean
technology emit 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting technology
emit 100 tonnes of CO2 emissions.
The governments of each country care about three things: (1) how much net profits
their representative firm makes, (2) how many total CO2 emissions are emitted in the
world, and (3) how much tax income they receive. In particular, let Ti(qi) denote
the profits of the representative firm in country i when it chooses technology qi and
E(qu, qF) = Eu (qu)+Ef(qf) the total CO2 emissions in the world. Then each country's
payoffs are given by:
Uu (qu, qF, E) 1000 × [TU (qu) — TU] − E(qu, qF) + 1000 × TU
UF (qu,qF, E) = πF(qF) — TF – 100 × E(qu,qF) + TF
-
Ti
= 2 and no tax
Suppose that each country can choose between a lump-sum tax of
Ti = 0. Countries can only impose taxes on their own firms, not on the firms of the other
countries.
1. Using the firm's behaviour given different tax levels, calculate the profit and emissions under
the following scenarios.
(a) Only the US imposes a tax: TU
(b) Only Fiji imposes a tax: Tf = 2, tu = 0.
(c) Both countries impose a tax: Tu = TF = 2.
(d) Neither country imposes a tax: TU = TF = 0.
=
: 2, TF = 0.
2. Using these results, Represent the interaction between the two governments as a static game:
who are the players, what are their actions, and what are the payoffs (you should use a table to
show the payoffs)
Transcribed Image Text:Two countries the US (U) and Fiji (F). Each country i E {U, F} can decide whether to impose a positive tax on the emissions of its polluting firms (t;> 0) or to impose no tax (t; = 0). We can think of a representative firm that chooses whether to produce using a polluting technology (q = P) or a clean technology (q = C). The polluting technology generates profits of (P) = 11. The clean technology generates profits of л(P) = 10 and doesn't have to pay tax. Imposing a tax of t = 1, profits of firms using polluting technology would equal profits of firms using clean. Assume that when the firm is indifferent between the two technologies, it chooses the clean technology. technology. Let us now turn to the decisions that the governments would make if they were inde- pendently choosing whether to impose a tax or not. In the US, firms using the clean technology emit a total of 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting technology emit a total of 900 tonnes of CO2 emissions. In Fiji, firms using the clean technology emit 0 tonnes of CO2 emissions, while firms using the polluting technology emit 100 tonnes of CO2 emissions. The governments of each country care about three things: (1) how much net profits their representative firm makes, (2) how many total CO2 emissions are emitted in the world, and (3) how much tax income they receive. In particular, let Ti(qi) denote the profits of the representative firm in country i when it chooses technology qi and E(qu, qF) = Eu (qu)+Ef(qf) the total CO2 emissions in the world. Then each country's payoffs are given by: Uu (qu, qF, E) 1000 × [TU (qu) — TU] − E(qu, qF) + 1000 × TU UF (qu,qF, E) = πF(qF) — TF – 100 × E(qu,qF) + TF - Ti = 2 and no tax Suppose that each country can choose between a lump-sum tax of Ti = 0. Countries can only impose taxes on their own firms, not on the firms of the other countries. 1. Using the firm's behaviour given different tax levels, calculate the profit and emissions under the following scenarios. (a) Only the US imposes a tax: TU (b) Only Fiji imposes a tax: Tf = 2, tu = 0. (c) Both countries impose a tax: Tu = TF = 2. (d) Neither country imposes a tax: TU = TF = 0. = : 2, TF = 0. 2. Using these results, Represent the interaction between the two governments as a static game: who are the players, what are their actions, and what are the payoffs (you should use a table to show the payoffs)
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Vertical Restraints
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education