6. Consider the US automobile industry, where firms with heterogeneousproductivity, subject to increasing returns to scale, produce a differenti-ated good and sell it in a monopolistically competitive market. Firms candecide whether to perform the entire production process in the US, or off-shore (through vertical FDI) part of the process, representing a share B ofthe variable cost, in Mexico, where wages are lower (WMEX < WUS = 1)The latter option entails a higher fixed cost (fvI > fD). Suppose that theUS government increases the share of variable cost that has to be sourcedin the U.S., so that B falls. Then:(a) only the least productive US multinationals would reduce FDI (i.e.,the volume of production in Mexico) and increase their price(b) only the most productive US multinationals would reduce FDI (i.e.,the volume of production in Mexico) and increase their price(c) the most productive US multinationals would increase FDI (i.e., thevolume of production in Mexico) and leave their price unchanged(d) none of the above

Trade and international relations are the study of resources, industrial services and commodities,…

Consider the US automobile industry, where firms with heterogeneous productivity, subject to increasing returns to scale, produce a differenti- ated good and sell it in a monopolistically competitive market. Firms can decide whether to perform the entire production process in the US, or off- shore (through vertical FDI) part of the process, representing a share 3 of the variable cost, in Mexico, where wages are lower (WMEX < wus = 1) The latter option entails a higher fixed cost (fv> fD). Suppose that the US government increases the share of variable cost that has to be sourced in the U.S., so that 8 falls. Then: (a) only the least productive US multinationals would reduce FDI (i.e., the volume of production in Mexico) and increase their price (b) only the most productive US multinationals would reduce FDI (i.e., the volume of production in Mexico) and increase their price (c) the most productive US multinationals would increase FDI (i.e., the volume of production in Mexico) and leave their price unchanged (d) none of the above

Consider the US automobile industry, where firms with heterogeneous productivity, subject to increasing returns to scale, produce a differenti- ated good and sell it in a monopolistically competitive market. Firms can decide whether to perform the entire production process in the US, or off- shore (through vertical FDI) part of the process, representing a share 3 of the variable cost, in Mexico, where wages are lower (WMEX < wus = 1) The latter option entails a higher fixed cost (fv> fD). Suppose that the US government increases the share of variable cost that has to be sourced in the U.S., so that 8 falls. Then: (a) only the least productive US multinationals would reduce FDI (i.e., the volume of production in Mexico) and increase their price (b) only the most productive US multinationals would reduce FDI (i.e., the volume of production in Mexico) and increase their price (c) the most productive US multinationals would increase FDI (i.e., the volume of production in Mexico) and leave their price unchanged (d) none of the above

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter10: Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4QFR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Continuing with the scenario in question 1, in the long run, the positive economic profits that the monopolistic competitor earns will attract a response either from existing firms in the industry or film outside. As those films capture the original films profit, what will happen to the original films profit-maximizing price and output levels?
Aside from advertising, how can monopolistically competitive films increase demand for their products?
If the firms in a monopolistically competitive market are earning economic profits or losses in the short run, would you expect them to continue doing so in the long run? Why?
Compare the elasticity of the monopolistic competitor’s demand with that of a pure competitor and a pure monopolist. Assuming identical long-run costs, compare graphically the prices and outputs that would result in the long run under pure competition and under monopolistic competition. Contrast the two market structures in terms of productive and allocative effifi ciency. Explain: “Monopolistically competitive industries are characterized by too many firms, each of which produces too little.”
You own Athleticon, which manufactures athletic wear. Your new contract with Atlanta United, a professional soccer team, allows Athleticon to be the sole suppler of athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo. No one lese can manufacture athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo. What do you think will be Athleticon’s level of profitability on the sale of “Atlanta United” athletic wear? Explain why. Your contract with Atlanta United only lasts 3 years. It was not renewed. Other firms can now manufacture athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo It is now 5 years after your contract with Atlanta United was terminated. Any manufacturer that wants to can manufacture and sell athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo. What do you think will be the level of profitability and rate of return on manufacturing athletic wear with the “Atlanta United” logo? Explain why.
Please Dram a proper Diagram of this question. I have not seen diagram in my previous question. Make a clear picture of the diagram Draw a precise diagram of long-run equilibrium in Edward Chamberlin's model of monopolistic competition. The diagram should illustrate the Excess Capacity Theorem, wherein a firm attains equilibrium at a point of tangency between the demand curve (AR curve) and the long-run AC curve, but with positive excess capacity. What is the relationship between own price-elasticity of demand for the close substitutes in this model and the extent of excess capacity ?
There are thousands of broadband internet providers in the country, while in a particular city the only way you can get it is through the phone, the cable company, and through DIRECTV. The best model to analyze this market is O monopoly. O monopolistic competition O oligopoly. O perfect competition.
In the long run, which of the following market has the following equilibrium condition: (1) everyone is making zero economic profit; (2) market price = ATC monopolistic competition monopoly O perfect competition oligopoly « Previous Nex No new data to save. Last checked at 11:47am Submit 000 80 DD esc F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9
at the Because this market is a monopolistically competitive market, you can tell that it is in long-run equihbrium by the fact that the efficient scale. optimal quantity for each firm. Furthermore, the quantity the firm produces n long-run equilibrium is True or False: This indicates that there is a markup on marginal cost in the market for jackets. OTrue False
Share Zoom DSlideshow 1 Oras E Edit Rotar 9. If a firm sells its output on a market that is characterized by a single seller and many buyers of a homogeneous product for which there are no close substitutes and barriers to long-run resource mobility, then the firm is: " O a. A monopolist b. An oligopolistic O c. A perfect competitor d. A monopolistic competitor
Place a black point (plus symbol) on the graph to indicate the long-run monopolistically competitive equilibrium price and quantity for this firm. Next, place a grey point (star symbol) to indicate the minimum average total cost the firm faces and the quantity associated with that cost. PRICE (Dolars per kit) 100 8 80 70 50 8 10 0 MO 10 ATC 20 30 O True O False MR 60 70 QUANTITY (Thousands of kits) Demand 40 80 90 100 Mon Comp Outcome Min Unit Cost Because this market is monopolistically competitive, you can tell that it is in long-run equilibrium by the fact that firm. Further, a monopolistically competitive firm's average total cost in long-run equilibrium is True or False: This indicates that there is excess capacity in the market for kits. at the optimal quantity for each the minimum average total cost.
The most important factor that drives the long-run profit to zero in monopolistic competition is the elasticity of the market demand curve the elasticity of the firm's demand curve free entry and exit O the reaction of rival firms to a change in price What is one difference between the Cournot and Stackelberg models? O In Cournot, both firms make price decisions simultaneously, and in Stackelberg, one firm sets its price level first O In Stackelberg, both firms make price decisions simultaneously, and in Cournot, one firm sets its price level first O In Cournot, both firms make output decisions simultaneously, and in Stackelberg, one firm sets its output level first O In Stackelberg, both firms make output decisions simultaneously, and in Cournot, one firm sets its output level first O Profits are zero in Cournot and positive in Stackelberg