Based on what you saw in the videos about internalizing externalities, do you think that the "leaving it to the market" approach (i.e., market-based solutions, such as government-imposed incentives toward renewable energy initiatives) is sufficient to transition away from fossil fuels and a linear economy as we try to minimize the already visible impacts of climate change? Or, do you think that a command and control approach is warranted in this case? Explain.

Based on what you saw in the videos about internalizing externalities, do you think that the "leaving it to the market" approach (i.e., market-based solutions, such as government-imposed incentives toward renewable energy initiatives) is sufficient to transition away from fossil fuels and a linear economy as we try to minimize the already visible impacts of climate change? Or, do you think that a command and control approach is warranted in this case? Explain.

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In an attempt to bring equity to the climate change agreement, the Framework Convention on Climate Change incorporated the concept of common but differentiated responsibilities, which suggested what? Select all that apply: a. developing countries may need to hinder their growth in order to meet emission reduction goals b. responsibility for reducing emissions should be placed on large corporations rather than countries c. all countries should be responsible for the same percentage of emission reductions d. the richest countries of the world should cut emissions prior to developing countries e. countries that have contributed more to overall emissions should be responsible for more reductions
To evaluate potential policy options that address emissions and climate change, economists often recommend a thorough cost-benefit analysis, in which the avoided environmental and human health damages are weighed against the["marginal abatement costs", "marginal abatement benefits"] . Most estimates by environmental economists suggest that the benefits of emission reduction are somewhere between 5-20% of world GDP, while the costs are between 1-4%. Using a cost-benefit analysis, this would imply that these policies ["should", "should not"] be implemented. The resulting policies can take the form of ["preventive", "adaptive"] strategies, those that reduce damages resulting from climate change, or ["preventive", "adaptive"] strategies that reduce emissions.
The following graph represents the market for high-emissions cars. Answer this question assuming that the externality is not internalised. In the stylised model, what is the cost of pollution per high-emission vehicle purchased by buyers equal to?
Typically this kind of economic activity results in environmental harm through production and consumption externalities. When a country such as Econ Land manages to break the link between economic activity and environmental harm, it is known as ["decoupling", "uncoupling"] . Whether Econ Land has truly broken this link or not depends on the amount of ["export pollution", "import pollution"] they are responsible for, pollution in other countries resulting from the production of products consumed in the country of Econ Land.
Imagine you are working as a climate advisor to the federal government and they want to craft a bill to drastically reduce methane emissions in America. Which of the following policies would you recommend to them as the most effective in reducing methane? a. federal and state funding being directed to the western states for large scale forest management and fire prevention b. incentive programs to reduce meat production and consumption, while additionally subsidizing alternative diet options c. a nationwide waste management program focused on composting organic material to divert waste from landfills d. incentivizing solar panels to allow for affordable renewable energy that is competitive with market pricing for energy]
Provide a reason why the marginal damages from some emissions may be increasing with the level of emissions (like in the figure above). Suppose the unregulated level of emissions is E3. What area(s) represent the total damages from unregulated emissions? Suppose emissions levels drop from E3 to E1. What area(s) represent the total benefits from the emissions reduction from E3 to E1? What point denotes the marginal damage from emissions at E2?
Consider the global market for carbon dioxide. how would you Explain the economic theories of intertemporal choice, choice under uncertainty, and externalities help in understanding this market and its welfare consequences, as well as the challenges one encounters when trying to apply such theories to this context?
What is an externality? And why are capitalist economies beset with pollution problems? (There are two mechanisms at work here.)
These two situations have arisen: Agricultural technologies become available that if used reduce adverse effects fromfarming on environmental quality Water from a uranium mine is leaking into Kakadu NationalPark For each case you are to identify possible external effects that might occur and explain the conditions that would need to exist, and what the government or the affected parties could do, to change these negative situations for the betterment of one or both parties?
Respond to only one of the following: • Option A. Suppose one of your classmates has been placing an external cost on you by distracting you while you are trying to complete your assignments. Use what you have learned about how the government aims to address externalities in the market to explain how your teacher could address this negative externality so that your classmate chooses not to distract you. or Option B. Explain how providing education to all children in grades K-12 provides external benefits to everyone in the community.
Do you think that there would be external effects associated with Water from a uranium mine leaking into Kakadu National Park? If so, what would be the nature of the external effects? Can you think of policies that might deal with each external effect (that is, improve social wellbeing)?
Externalities Do you think that there would be external effects associated with Water from a uranium mine leaking into Kakadu National Park? If so, what would be the nature of the external effects? Can you think of policies that might deal with each external effect (that is, improve social wellbeing)?