An injection molding system has a first cost of $175,000 and an annual operating cost of $95,000 in years 1 and 2, increasing by $6,000 per year thereafter.The salvage value of the system is 25% of the first cost regardless of when the system is retired within its maximum useful life of 5 years. Using a MARR of11% per year, determine the ESL and the respective AW value of the system.

An injection molding system has a first cost of $175,000 and an annual operating cost of $95,000 in years 1 and 2, increasing by $6,000 per year thereafter.The salvage value of the system is 25% of the first cost regardless of when the system is retired within its maximum useful life of 5 years. Using a MARR of11% per year, determine the ESL and the respective AW value of the system.

Principles of Accounting Volume 2

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172609

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter11: Capital Budgeting Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17EA: Gardner Denver Company is considering the purchase of a new piece of factory equipment that will...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Caduceus Company is considering the purchase of a new piece of factory equipment that will cost $565,000 and will generate $135,000 per year for 5 years. Calculate the IRR for this piece of equipment. For further instructions on internal rate of return In Excel, see Appendix C.
An injection molding system has a first cost of $200,000 and an annual operating cost of $85,000 in years 1 and 2, increasing by $4,500 per year thereafter. The salvage value of the system is 25% of the first cost regardless of when the system is retired within its maximum useful life of 5 years. Using a MARR of 9% per year, determine the ESL and the respective AW value of the system. The ESL is year(s) and AW value of the system is $
A new robot has a first cost of $380,000, and an annual operating cost of $88,000 in years 1 and 2, increasing by $10000 per year thereafter. The salvage value of the system is $25,000 regardless of when the system is retired within its maximum useful life of 5 years. Using a MARR of 14% per year, determine the ESL and the respective AW value of the system ESL: a) 1 year b) 4 years c) 5 years d) 3 years AW value of system: a) $204,860 b) $336,284 c) $97,953 d) $496,200
A company with a MARR of 10% must install one of two production machines. The economic parameters of each machine are as follows: Machine Initial cost (5) Service life (years) Salvage value end of life (S) $15,000 4 years $22,000 6 years 52,000 $1,000 The Future worth (FW) for the machine Y over the 12 years analysis period is:
An asset which has a first cost of RM 40,000 is expected to have an annual operating cost of RM 15,000 per year. It will provide the needed service for a maximum of 6 years. If the salvage value changes as shown below , determine the economic life of the asset at 20 % per year.
The initial investment cost of machine A is $ 9,000 and the useful life of the machine is 6 years and annually.operating costs are $ 5,000. The initial investment cost of machine B is 16.000 $ and 9 yearsAt the end of its useful life, the machine can be sold for $ 4,000. Operation of machine BSince their cost is $ 4,000 per year, the alternative lifetimes of the machines areBased on an analysis time as much as a solid (EKOK), two machines according to the present value analysis.compare. Interest rate 10% per year (Answer: MSD (A) = 57,954 $; MSD (B) = 53,175 $)
A project has an initial investment of $45,000. This project needs an annual spending of $6,000 to generate an annual revenue of $18,000 for six years. Moreover, the project is expected to return $12,000 as a salvage value at the EOY 6. Calculate the AW using MARR of 10%
A piece of equipment has an initial cost of $125,000. The annual 0&M costs are $31,000 and increase $1000 per year. The annual revenue is $45,000 and increase $1,500 per year. The equipment has a life span of 8 years and a salvage value of $30,000. Based on a MARR of 5%, determine the following: a. If the project is viable based on Net Present Worth. b. Determine the amount the annual revenue has to be increased to make the project viable. c. Determine the amount the salvage value has to increase to make the project viable.
The operating cost of a pulverized coal cyclone furnace is expected to be $80,000 per year. The steam produced will be needed for 6 years—now through year 5. Determine the equivalent annual worth, A, in years 1 through 5 of the operating costs at an interest rate of 10% per year.
The table given below lists the relevant cost items for a specific system purchase. The operating expenses for the new system are $10,000 per year, and the useful life of the system is expected to be five years. The salvage value for depreciation purposes is equal to 25% of the hardware cost. Cost Item Cost Hardware $160,000 Training $15,000 Installation $15,000 a) What is the Book Value (BV) of the device at the end of year three if the Straight Line (SL) depreciation method is used? b) Suppose that after depreciating the device for two years with the SL method, the firm decides to switch to the double declining balance depreciation method for the remainder of the device's life (the remaining three years). What is the device's BV at the end of four years?
$500,000 is invested in equipment having a salvage value equal to $500,000(0.80n) after n years of use. O&M costs equal $125,000 the first year and increase $15,000 per year. Based on a MARR of 10%, what are the optimum replacement interval and minimum EUAC?
A currently owned shredder used in a refuse-powered electrical generating plant has a present net realizable value of$210,000 and is expected to have a market value of $10,000 after 4 years. Operating and maintenancedisbursements are $100,000 per year. An equivalent shredder can be leased for $200 per day plus $80 perhour of actual use as determined by an hour meter, with both components assumed to be paid at year-end. Actual useis expected to be 1,500 hours and 250 days per year. Using a 4-year planning horizon, a before-tax analysis, and aMARR of 15 percent, determine the preferred alternative using the annual cost criterion.a. Consider only the above information and use the cash flow approach (insider’s viewpoint approach). (11.2.1)b. Consider the addition of a third alternative, to operate without any shredder at all, at an annual cost of $190,000.Use the cash flow approach (insider’s viewpoint approach). (11.2.1)c. Consider only the above information and use the opportunity cost…