A chemist is studying the following reaction that has an equilibrium constant of 6.5 x 10² 1/M 2NO(g) + 2H₂ (8) N₂ (g) + 2H₂O(g) She measures the concentrations of all of the chemicals in her beaker. . [NO] -0.089 M • [H₂] -0.035 M . [N₂] -0.008 M . [H₂0] -0.098 M Based on the concentrations she measured, is this reaction currently at equilibrium? If not, which way must the reaction shift to attain equilibrium? O Yes, it is at equilibrium O No, it is not at equilibrium. It needs to shift toward the products O No, it is not at equilibrium. It needs to shift toward the reactants O There is not enough information to solve this problem.

World of Chemistry, 3rd edition
3rd Edition
ISBN:9781133109655
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan L. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan L. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Chapter17: Equilibrium
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 38A
icon
Related questions
Question
A chemist is studying the following reaction that has an equilibrium constant of 6.5 x 102 1/M
2NO(g) + 2H₂ (g) = N₂ (g) + 2H₂O (g)
She measures the concentrations of all of the chemicals in her beaker.
• [NO] = 0.089 M
*
[H₂] = 0.035 M
[N₂] = 0.008 M
@
[H₂O) = 0.098 M
Based on the concentrations she measured, is this reaction currently at equilibrium? If not, which way must the reaction shift to attain equilibrium?
4
Yes, it is at equilibrium
No, it is not at equilibrium. It needs to shift toward the products
No, it is not at equilibrium. It needs to shift toward the reactants
There is not enough information to solve this problem.
*
Transcribed Image Text:A chemist is studying the following reaction that has an equilibrium constant of 6.5 x 102 1/M 2NO(g) + 2H₂ (g) = N₂ (g) + 2H₂O (g) She measures the concentrations of all of the chemicals in her beaker. • [NO] = 0.089 M * [H₂] = 0.035 M [N₂] = 0.008 M @ [H₂O) = 0.098 M Based on the concentrations she measured, is this reaction currently at equilibrium? If not, which way must the reaction shift to attain equilibrium? 4 Yes, it is at equilibrium No, it is not at equilibrium. It needs to shift toward the products No, it is not at equilibrium. It needs to shift toward the reactants There is not enough information to solve this problem. *
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Chemical Equilibrium
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
World of Chemistry, 3rd edition
World of Chemistry, 3rd edition
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781133109655
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan L. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Brooks / Cole / Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781133611097
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry: An Atoms First Approach
Chemistry: An Atoms First Approach
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305079243
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Introductory Chemistry: A Foundation
Introductory Chemistry: A Foundation
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781337399425
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry for Engineering Students
Chemistry for Engineering Students
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781337398909
Author:
Lawrence S. Brown, Tom Holme
Publisher:
Cengage Learning