1. What will a diagram look like if we assume increasing returns of scale for two countries trading with each other? 2. Visualize a diagram which portrays a high inelastic export situation of a large country and declining terms of trade?

1. What will a diagram look like if we assume increasing returns of scale for two countries trading with each other? 2. Visualize a diagram which portrays a high inelastic export situation of a large country and declining terms of trade?

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter33: International Trade

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6SCQ: Table 33.15 shows how the average costs of production for semiconductors (the chips In computer...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

QUESTION 1 Consider the model with R&D and Components and with two countries: Home and Foreign. Home has comparative advantage in R&D. Which of the statements below is TRUE? Oa The Terms of Trade of Home will worsen over time if Foreign improves in R&D. Ob The Terms of Trade of Home will improve over time if Foreign improves in R&D Oe If Foreign improves in R&D or Components, gains from trade could disappear over time Od The Terms of Trade of Foreign will improve over tume if Home improves in Components.
Analyze the following (2x2) matrix. Identify the countries having certain advantages. Moreover, specify the benefits of trade for both countries. Matrix A Wheat (bushels/labor hour ) Cloth (yards/labor hour) United States 6 4 U.K. 1 3 (Numerical values reflect output per unit of input) Will trade occur? Identify the country having the absolute advantage in wheat and the one having the absolute advantage in cloth. Identify the production possibility frontiers for both countries. Show the gains of trade if we assume that the U.S. exchanges 6 units of wheat for 6 units of cloth.
In the Heckscher-Ohlin model, suppose the two factors of production are: high-skilled labor (H) and regular labor (L). The two sectors are manufacturing and business services. Manufacturing uses regular labor more intensively, and business services uses high-skilled labor more intensively. The two countries are the U.S. and China, and the U.S. has a comparative advantage in business services. a. Illustrate the effect of opening up to trade on the U.S. with the PPF and indifference curve diagram. Make sure you clearly label everything. What happens to the relative price of business services in the U.S.? Show clearly the gains from trade. b. What happens to the relative wage of high-skilled labor? Does inequality (the skill premium) increase? Show all work and explain. 2. Evidence for or against Heckscher-Ohlin model Leontieff Paradox i. Briefly describe the paradoxii.We discussed several explanations for the paradoxical result in class. Briefly describe two explanations. Inequality…
Question 1 Consider the standard trade model with two goods and two factors, labour and capital. (a) Suppose that a country experiences an increase in its capital stock. How would the production possibility frontier change as a result? Illustrate this with a simple twogood diagram. (B) Consider two countries: Home and Foreign. Each country produces two goods, cloth (C) and food (F). Assume Home is an exporter of cloth. Assume also that Home is a large country. Now suppose Home imposes a 20 percent tariff on the value of food imports. What will be the effect of the food tariff on the relative price of cloth and terms of trade? Illustrate your answer with a relevant diagram.
Indicate and explain how production and consumption gains arise with specialization in international trade. You may use a graph to assist your explanation.
Assume that two countries, A and B, can produce Beef and Barbecues and the production possibilities frontiers of two countries are represented by: Country A: Beef = 30 - 1.25 BBQ and Country B: BBQ = 15 - 0.5 Beef Barbecues are measured in units, beef in kilograms. a) On a single chart, graph the production possibility frontiers for Country A and for Country B. Make sure you use a good scale and mark all your axes and important curves or points. b) Interpret the slope and the shape of the PPF for each country and make the relevant comparisons. c) Assume that each country allocates half of its resources to the production of beef and half of its resources to the production of barbecues. Under autarky (No trade), how much would each country consume of the two products? Plot these points on the graph as Ca and Cb respectively d) Should either of these countries specialize in the production of beef and/or barbecues? If yes, explain which country and which products and why. If they…
Q) Which statement is true of natural resources in terms of global trade or a country’s economy? a. Steep declines in the price of oil had a negative impact on America’s oil producers. b. The past decade has witnessed the discovery of an abundance of natural resources. c. Petroleum is the only natural resource that affects international marketing. d. Vast differences in natural resources result in minor shifts of wealth among countries. Give me correct explaination and not copy paste anything from anywhere.
1. Consider the following example of the Ricardian model Units of labor required per unit of output: France (F) Italy (I) 5 2 Beef (B) Corn (C) 3 4 Labor Force (a) Determine which country has an absolute advantage in which good and which country has a comparative advantage in which good. Compute opportunity cost ratios and relative autarky prices, defined as PC/PB. 48000 50000 (b) Draw the PPFs (put C on the horizontal axis) and label endpoints with appropriate figures. Supposing that each country splits its labor force in half between C and B in autarky, show the autarky equilibrium. (c) Now let the price ratio established in trade equal (Pc/PB)* = 1.0 and suppose France exports 500 units of beef. Determine each country's imports and exports, show the equilibrium trade triangles and compute the gains from trade for each country in terms of units of B and C. Briefly indicate which country gets larger gains and why.
Analyzing the following (2x2) matrices. Identify the countries having certain advantages. Specify the benefits of trade for both countries. This matrix involves 2 countries exchanging 2 commodities Wheat (Labor hours/Unit of Output ) Steel (Labor hours/Unit of Output) Germany 30 40 France 20 80 (Numerical values reflect labor hours per unit of output) Will trade occur? Identify the country having the advantage in wheat production and the one having the advantage in steel production. Identify the production possibility frontiers for both countries. along with the gains from trade.
For the first part I have drawn a graph but now it is wanting a graph drawn in U.S dollars showing clearly the price that the US importers (the buyers) pay and the quantity of trade that will occur. I have attached my first graph I have made along with the equations given. But I do not understand how to make this graph.
Assume a Ricardian, constant-cost world. There are two countries, the United States andCanada. Each country can produce cameras and milk. The table below shows production perman-hour for each country. US Canada cameras 6 2 milk 1 2 The United States has a labor force of 1,000 workers, and Canada has a labor force of 500workers.a) Graph the world supply curve for cameras.b) Show a possible world demand curve and price (assuming that both countries completelyspecialize).
Table 33.15 shows how the average costs of production for semiconductors (the chips In computer memories) change as the quantity of semiconductors built at that factory increases. Based on these data, sketch a curve with quantity produced on the horizontal axis and average cost of production on the vertical axis. How does the curve illustrate economies of scale? If the equilibrium quantity of semiconductors demanded is 90,000, can this economy take full advantage of economies of scale? What about if quantity demanded is 70,000 semiconductors? 50,000 semiconductors? 30,000 semiconductors? Explain how international trade could make it possible for even a small economy to take full advantage of economies of scale, while also benefiting from competition and the variety offered by several producers.