Lakshay Jain
Carol Newell
Business and Its Publics: Discourse
2 March 2014
The Imperfect System To Bike
It is never easy to do good for the society. It comes with many complications. Money, effort, oppositions. It is never easy and especially to do it in New york city, the centre of all economic opportunities, just makes it even more difficult. It all started in 2006, under the leadership of former mayor, Michael Bloomberg, when “the city planning department conducted a survey of city bicycle commuters and recreational cyclists in 2006”( Lyon 4) to see the feasibility of NYC city bike share program. The main intention or rather the main motive for introducing a bike share program was to “maximise efficiency of existing mass
…show more content…
They have the opportunity to get additional business from customers in search of protective gear and other accessories”(TDG 29).
The contract also introduces new unexpected challenges to Alta and its vendors, such as hurricane Sandy and malfunctioning bikes, forcing the company to adapt and mature as a business. Now, coming back to the point of city being a major stake holder too. One of the main reasons for bikeshare program was also less pollution but sometimes vans are used to transport bikes from one station to another, which negate the air pollution reduction. One another ‘advantage’ of cycling which is also outweighed by its effect was made by Fuller: Though cycling does help one stay healthy but “the health benefits of physical activity resulting from increased cycling would outweigh the risks of collision and exposure to air pollution” ( Fuller e85). An externality city may face is “complaints from
Jain 4 motorists that cyclists who use bicycle-sharing schemes tend to be inexperienced riders who do not follow the traffic rules”(United Nations 18).
Though The initial program had a fairly positive response from the community and the city claims the program has already broken even (as of January 2014, merely months after the May 2013 introduction of the program). The next step of this program is to expand Citi Bike and the entire bike share system to other New York City boroughs and
In the article, Toronto should crack down on loud motorcycles by David Cooper, the author discusses how Toronto Councillor Kristin Wong is attempting to cut noise pollution in the city of Toronto. Individuals with loud motorcycles creates a negative externality in consumption because the private benefits to the individual is less than the social costs incurred by society. The argument in the article is that although owners of loud motorcyclists may feel safe, the general public will be negatively affected by the excessive noise created by loud motorcycles. The issue the article addresses is noise pollution by loud motorcycles and policies to help reduce the amount of noise pollution in the city of Toronto.
When there are more bikes around, people drive safe and when there are more bikes around, people drive safer and are aware of them. The more bicyclists we see, the safer the roads are going to be for them. I think Manhattan should be doing everything it can to encourage people to bike safe and make the city a safer place to bike
RTD’s new BRT project will save 29,575 Metric Tons of greenhouse gases (CO2) over a 20-year period through the reduction of auto trips. The long-term strategy to address these issues are to development a more balanced transportation system that emphasizes an expansion of convenient and high quality transit services throughout the region. The amount of congestion is expected to decrease over time as ridership increases. The BRT Expansion project is intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve public health and the livability of Stockton. A growing number of Stockton residents prefer to drive less and rely more on walking, bicycling, and public transportation because it is much healthier. The shift from auto travel to transit, walking, and bicycling will result in significant reduction in transportation-related
Having a bicycle-friendly system can also benefit the city by bringing in more taxpayer money from annual fees to use the trail. The city would have the option to charge for the use of the trail which can lead in covering the cost of paying, maintaining, and improving the trail. It could also bring a source of extra income for the city to be able to use for other needs within the city. To be able to gain these benefits there is one solution I can think of that the city can do.
Amy Westervelt article “Bike-Sharing Grows Up: New Revenue Models Turn a Nice Idea Into Good Business” explains how the bike –sharing program started and grew into a dependent, and steady business that became global. In the story there is a failure in the small town of Ojai, California when starting up a bike-sharing program due to how it was handled. At the time there many other small towns in the United States that also ran unsuccessful bike sharing programs. Many years later there was a relaunch in Paris that end up being successful, from having cool bikes, better placement for them and reasonable pricing; therefor the US had a trial run at the Democratic convention in Denver in 2008. Washington, D.C. flourished so much that it became
I chose to address the problem of not having bike lanes at UNR because it is something that I see affects students everyday throughout campus. As not only a person who walks, but also rides throughout campus, I am able to see from both sides of the spectrum why this is a problem. Not only can it be a safety issue, but it is an inconvenience for anyone here at the University. I was able to identify the stakeholders because I am one. Anyone here at the University is a stakeholder because everyone on campus is affected by this problem. Many students, staff, and faculty are concerned with the safety and wellbeing throughout campus, so with this problem being a major inconvenience I was able to see how it may be concerning to some people.
In this era, the bicycle had evolved from the eccentric, yet impractical, “penny-fairer”, which was prone to tipping due to its iconic, oversized, front wheel, into the modern “safety” bicycle with two same sized wheels; this contraption, unlike its predecessor, was formed specifically for Essentially, this was the first push toward a government funded transportation bill. The effort made, however, was cut short by the farmers’ lack of enthusiasm to provide tax money for roads they did not use as frequently as cyclists; despite the overwhelming evidence that poorly maintained roads took more money out of their pockets. (Weingroff, FHA at 100)
The author constructs the argument in this passage by explaining what the bike-sharing program is first, by doing so it intrigues the reader to the benefits of the program. The author talks about how New York City uses the bike-share system, then explains how the bike-share system is used around the world by bringing up the statics in Paris, France. The average amount of rentals each day in Paris is 75,000 per day and survies have taken place to determine the percent benefit.
Secondly, cycling in New York City is increasing sharply as a transportation. However, “Regulating Rickshws says more than 500 people annually work as bicycle rickshaw, or pedicab, drivers, who in 2005 handled one million passengers” (Zukowski, Gregg March 6, 2006). Cycling could be more interesting than any other transportations. However, cycling now a days may help people explore the city by the view, weather, and meet new people. However, don’t forget cycling is one kind of exercise. On the other hand, “Cycling in Amsterdam is one of the best ways to get around Amsterdam, and no visitor should leave without experiencing the city's world famous bike culture.” (“Cycling in Amsterdam,” N.D., para. 1). In Amsterdam its more common to get around
This project plan details the intentions and requirements of a project contracted by the Capital Bikeshare. The project’s goal is to increase bike rentals by optimally selecting locations for bike rack stations. As contracted consultants, our team’s intent is to provide Capital Bikeshare with an analytic tool that evaluates locations in the Washington DC metropolitan statistical area for their fit as bike stations. The analytic tool includes visuals to supplement the scoring system to assist the Capital Bikeshare operators with their judgments.
The main topic of this meeting was where to put the Phase 1 (of 3) BikeShare installations. “Since the 1960s many counties have made some form of public participation mandatory for major transportation projects and policies” (Schiller p.201), which means this meeting may have been more about fulfilling a legal requirement than seeking the publics opinion. Issues discussed in the meeting were whether on or off street stations were more ideal, if certain locations were in optimal locations for the stations’ solar panels,
the city with a bike sharing system. The decision was part of “Reinvent Montreal”: an ambitious program
Minimize accidents by taking defensive driving courses for motorcyclists or related safety training programs. These lessons will provide invaluable tips on improving your responses to the potential dangers on the road. For instance, maintaining an appropriate distance between you and other vehicles and avoiding the blind spots of other drivers around you.
Amy Westervelt wrote an article on Bike Sharing /Grows Up: New Revenue Models Turn a Nice Idea into Good Business. Since the early 1980s bike sharing groups were in small towns all over the United States. Since people have become worried about the environment, bike sharing programs are being revisited as a source of saving the environment. For Example, France started a bike sharing program in 2007, that has grown into 50 million plus riders. The United States has followed this idea along with India and China. However, one of the biggest issues with bike-sharing programs is funding. A solution to this issue, was advertising. This idea had a great impact on companies to offset the cost of operating the program and companies even made a profit.
This proposal argument will aim at persuading university officials, specifically those in charge of the university transportation services, to reconsider their handling of bicycle and other non-motorized transportation rules and safety on campus. There are many rules that bicyclists and other alternative transportation users must follow, for example, “bicycles [are] not [to] be ridden on sidewalks or any pedestrian paths in the limited bike zone [central campus]”, yet not