Why John Brown Should Be Abolished Dbq

John Brown was a man who supported the abolition of slavery, and a man who also furthermore, fought for it. Unlike many abolitionists, John Brown, as an orthodox Calvinist himself, believed that the issue of slavery could only be fought by violence and bloodshed. In his last remarks on the day of his hanging, John Brown states, “I John Brown am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land: will never be purged away; but with blood.” Even in an abolitionist meeting, Frederick Douglass, an African-American abolitionist, who is generally non-violent, declares, “slavery can only be destroyed by bloodshed.” I also agree that the issue of slavery can only be solved by violence and physical harm. Words wouldn’t stop a violent and conservative South. Slavery had already grown too large of an epidemic in the South to stop by ineffective medical treatment. A war to end slavery would have to take place in order for real action to occur. John Brown was a man who accelerated the upcoming of a civil war between the Union and the Confederacy. John Brown was a hero because he started the war. Brown spread the message to the North that action was needed, and it came soon. Soon after Brown was hanged in 1859, Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 1861, and the civil war also began in

Referred to as a “antislavery zealot” by some and as a “heroic hand” by others, John Brown was certainly one who stained history with blood. John Brown’s conduction of anti-slavery raids to fight “fire with fire”, triggered by his radical ways to fight the tyranny that was slavery,Brown impacted the whole country. During this time most anti-slavery supporters were peaceful and only tried to fight slavery “morally”, however John Brown lead many anti slavery raids his most famous and the one which he would have to pay with his life being, the Harpers Ferry Raid. The seizing of federal armory and arsenal with a group of men with just a mere hope of the local slave population helping him in order to reach success and create a nation wide effect failed miserably when the slavery population frightened did not join his raid. Captured, John Brown delivered one of the most enticing and alluring speech during his trial, his last speech, his address to the court in which he admits his actions in his “crusade” to fight slavery as well as patronizingly accepts his punishment without regret or remorse. In his speech he address one objection, being that if he was fighting on behalf of the rich, high class and those who supported and benefited from the tyrant slavery system,he would have been rewarded and praised instead of punished, proving that once again the tyrant, oppresing, racist and discriminating federal government was being run by bias men who aimed to keep the inhuman hierarchy

John Brown was very similar to Nat Turner they both believed that they were chosen by god to lead slaves into freedom and if that required a fight then that was what they had to do. John Brown had a goal and that was to abolish slavery throughout the united states. The trouble in Kansas began when the Nebraska Act was signed by President Pierce, this act engaged that people make a determination on whether Kansas territory should be free or slave. In hopes that Kansas would become free of slaves, the opposing side which was named Border Ruffians invaded their territory and forced the pro-slavery election. After John heard about the fear of Kansas becoming a slave state and after also hearing that the Border Ruffians ransacked the town of Lawrence

John Brown was a cold-blooded killer. Although John was trying to abolish slavery, violence was not the way to go. According to Robert E. Lee according to Robert E. Lee., John killed a lot of men. He killed 10 raiders, and captured 7. Although they were people who were for slavery, she should have never killed them. Martin Luther King didn't like slavery either but he found another way to stop it and that was by his protesting not killing. According to Fredrick Douglas, John's plan to abolish slavery was not that appealing. I don't think John was looking at both sides of things. I think all John was thinking was kill people who are for slavery but he didn't think about he could abolish slavery with his words and not his swords. According to

John Brown was a misguided fanatic. He was admired by many abolitionists for standing up for the rights. However, was seen outrageous in the eyes of many Southerners. He has went far beyond outrageous and carried out a killing spree in order to prove slavery was wrong. He had a plan, however stirred in a lot of problems along with it gained him the name a “misguided fanatic”.

During the eighteenth century, the opposition to slavery prior to forming the United States became increasingly stronger between the Northern and Southern territories. Prior to the 1830s, antislavery societies began to emerge from every corner to challenge the slave system and to help combat slavery. During this time, people had different ideas about how to confront the issue of slavery in the system and how to establish a freedom of oppression. In the eighteenth century, antislavery political activists believed the slave system would able to be changed through peaceful political reforms, while others felt that real change could only be achieved by violence. A radical white abolitionist named John Brown became a historical figure whose beliefs motivated the violent abolitionist crusade.

Brown's attack on Harper's Ferry affected American culture more than can ever be understood. Tension between the North and South was building in the 1850's. Slavery among many other things was dividing the country into two sections. Brown was executed on December 2, 1859 for his murderous out-lash on society. Was his mind so twisted and demented that he would commit cold-blooded murder? The answer is no. John Brown was a man with a goal and a purpose. When he said that abolition could not be achieved without blood he was right. It is one of histories great ironies; John Brown's struggle preceded the Civil War by only 17 months. Thousands of people were killed in the Civil War, yet John Brown

This is when his mission started to become more and more violent. Brown published an essay instructing African Americans to stay together to resist this new law. He ordered them to even if it took killing the slave catchers, that’s what they had to do. He formed an armed resistance against the Fugitive Slave Law. Brown’s United League recruited 44 African Americans. Following this, the Kansas-Nebraska Act surfaced, which allowed settlers to decided whether or not to be free or to practice slavery. Then, in order to achieve the southern support in the 1856 Democratic presidential nomination, Stephen Douglas proposed to divide the new territory into two. This meant that Kansas, since it was in the more southern of the two territories, would be made into a slave state. This would lead to the start of an organized militia against slavery.

He wanted to arm the slaves with weapons and ammunition. He seized the federal complex and then sent out people to contact slaves in the country. The slaves did not want to join him in his ambush of the arsenal. The local militia surrounded him and killed eight of Brown’s people that were fighting with him. U.S. marines led by Lieutenant Colonel Robert E. Lee were ordered to arrest John Brown.

In the article by Brendan January, he states what John Brown was trying to accomplish with his acts, “Brown rose from his seat and declared that he would spend the resto fhis life trying to destroy slavery” (January 3). Aboloshing salvery was John Brown’s life goal, because he strongly believed everyone had the same right to be free. If Brown was not recognized for his brave actions, the severety of slavery may not have been as strongly noticed. He was eventually killed for his decision on trial, and was a martyr for our country. Brown’s death upset many people because he was only doing what he thought was

His views on cruelly ending slaving with violence and bloodshed only prove is madness. “Several of his colleagues also petitioned that the courts should look at Brown’s questionable mental state when it came to his actions.” With all the “violence” John Brown tried to create with his radical actions to end slavery, his actions did very little to end slavery. On the contrary, slave owners in the south treated slaves more barbaric because they started to feel threatened as his actions. Many thought his rebellion was going to succeed so many treated the slaves as the target. Many believe that his actions help stir up the civil war. In conclusion, John Brown tried to terminate slavery in savage ways many times and each time revealed his level of

Whether or not they accepted it, the people finally saw the type of force that Brown had been trying to show others all along, and with that new sense of their position, the Civil War began. Some may argue that even though John Brown is said to have created the Civil War which stopped slavery, he still should be considered a terrorist for his history. Understanding the history of Brown’s actions, you can see that they were not the best way to help the slaves, but if John Brown didn’t do what he did or die how he did, would the War have even happened? Even if it did occur, it most likely would have taken longer for it to happen leading to more

John Brown's goal was to free the slaves, end slavery, and protect them. Just like a terrorist group called the Weather Undergrounds. The Weather Underground's goal was to create a clandstine revolutionary party for the overthrow of the U.S. Government. John Brown would hang and kill to end slavery. At Pottawatomie Creek, him and his band of abolitionist settlers killed five settlers north of Pottawatomie. Brown wanted to start a liberation movement among the slaves there, and that’s why he did a raid on Harpers Ferry. John Brown would do bad actions and events to get his goal and to do his religion. Just like terrorists do bad things to get their goal and their religion. Although, Brown was charged with treason, murder, and starting a slave rebellion. Also, most terrorist are very bad because they do bad actions and events

During the 1850s, Douglas was in the fore front in abolishing slavery, which was threatening, to tear the country apart. In the beginning, Douglas felt that John Brown’s anti- slavery ideas and plans were suicidal and he refused to engage in a raid on Harper Ferry. Brown’s activities saw him captured and hanged, an act which

John Brown was a man who had dedicated his life to the abolition of slavery. He believed that any method used to abolish this cruel allowance of slavery was justified. Brown is notoriously known as an abolitionist who killed people as way to provoke serious change. While some say he killed people for a good reason, those who disagree hold the opinion that the killing of these people was terrible and did not solve the problem. Even though John Brown’s end goal was laudable, both the raid on Harpers Ferry and on Pottawatomie massacre demonstrate that his actions were in fact, acts of terrorism rather than heroism. There is never a justifiable reason to kill another human. In both the context of the Harpers Ferry raid, or the bloodshed in Pottawatomie, it is easy to see that John Brown was in fact a terrorist, rather than a hero.