preview

Why Is Zaroff Defeated In The Most Dangerous Game

Decent Essays

What, in the end, truly defeats an enemy? In a story, would it be the hero? Or could it be said villain's own morals and personal traits? In the short story, "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connell, the world class hunter Sanger Rainsford happens upon Ship-Trap island and stumbles into General Zaroff's hunting game. Throughout the story, General Zaroff hunts Rainsford mercilessly in an attempt to kill him. However, in the end, the general is defeated. Now, why was Zaroff defeated? Is it because Rainsford had more deftness and expertise? This is not correct. In truth, General Zaroff far outclassed Rainsford in terms of skill as demonstrated by Connell, "Nothing escaped those searching black eyes, no crushed blade of grass, no bent twig, …show more content…

He not only hunts humans and kills them for sport, but enjoys doing so. After all, the general only sees humans as beasts to be hunted. Zaroff does not even see his right-hand man, Ivan, as a human being, for he professes here, "Like all his [Ivan's] race, a bit of a savage. He is a Cossack . . . So am I."(Connell 24) This not only displays General Zaroff's opinion of his servant, but his own point of view regarding most human beings. However, General Zaroff does not only exercise every meaning of cruelty in a physical sense, but utilizes it in a psychological sense as well. Because of this psychological warfare that Zaroff wages against Rainsford, he fails to kill Rainsford the first, second, and third night. As an additional note, Zaroff also pushed Rainsford to the point where Rainsford would not give up on taking Zaroff's life, even if it meant that Rainsford would have to stoop to the level of morality known as murder. For an example of this internal game Zaroff plays with Rainsford, Connell wrote, "The general's eyes had left the ground and were traveling inch by inch up the tree. . . the sharp eyes of the hunter stopped before they reached the limb where Rainsford lay; a smile spread over his brown face."(Connell 32) This means that Zaroff knew that Rainsford was there, yet did not kill him for an unspecified reason. Those few actions could be overconfidence, or it could be General …show more content…

Not only does he easily find Rainsford on the first day, the general also has excellent reflexes. As declared by Connell, Zaroff had "the sureness of a bloodhound . . . [the] agility of an ape"(Connell 33) When it came to reflexes and observation, General Zaroff was in a league of his own. As a result, this begs the question: why does this lead to his defeat? A flaw that commonly spawns from brilliance is overconfidence and the boredom of being forever unequaled. A lack of challenge, if you will. Of course, the general had plenty of both. Because the general had gotten so bored of hunting because there was no longer a challenge, he sought out new prey. This would not be a such an inconvenience if Zaroff had only been

Get Access