Why Is John Brown A Terrorist

John Brown's actions at Pottawatomie Creek and Harper's Ferry can be seen as acts of terrorism by a person or peoples opinion, but a closer study of modern and historic violent actions show he was a freedom fighter. Certainly, this is factual because there is no actual definition of terrorism, it is simply an opinion on someone's actions. Therefore, it is almost irrelevant for one be convicted a terrorist if no one can actually have a justified reasoning behind their choices.

The Third reason why John Brown is a terrorist is because he was a murderer. The fact is he did kill a person which does make him a murderer. John Brown was a law-breaker! Yes, that may seem surprising but he was charged with treason and then was sentenced to death.

Terrorism, the very word bring a foul mood with it, wherever it goes, yet most don’t even know the meaning of the word. Most people insult the idea without very little thought, even when knowing not a thing about it, or why its being caused. The Boston Tea party was an act of terrorism, and is taught to be known as one in some schools in the U.S., and many will rise and say that the Boston Tea Party was a justified, valiant, and patriotic act. Terrorism, in many cases, can be proven.

Through the violent acts that were sparked and initiated by the Sons of Liberty, they were indeed terrorists to the British. For example, the atrocious action of dumping the tea at Boston Harbor is considered “treasonous and punishable by death” due to deliberately disrupting the trade and economy of the British through revolt and violence. In addition, the Stamp Act caused the Sons of Liberty to aggressively revolt against the British nobility, and they continue to “confiscate, burn, and unpack” property, and furthermore, threatening the Royal Governor of New York Cadwallader Colden with violence and even death. Lastly, to emphasize political upheaval and propaganda, the Sons of Liberty promote their terrorism to coerce various individuals

Terrorism is a word that strikes fear into many hearts, thus causing immediate panic to many. Although, the word terrorism is doesn't have a definite meaning. People often give their own opinion on terrorism. President Obama said, according to an article by Laura Beth Nielsen “What Is terrorism?”, source Al Jazeera, “Anytime bombs are used to target civilians, it is an act of terrorism.”. While so many people get caught up in who president Obama is, many people forget that he is also a human. Just like any other human he has his own opinion and he also makes mistakes. An opinion is a view or judgement formed about something. So this could mean Obama is incorrect in his assumption on the definition of terrorism. Now, that is also my opinion, therefore I could be wrong as well, but what how is anyone supposed to be correct when there is no legitimate interpretation of the word terrorism.

You will have just seen a series of exhibits encrypting highlights of the controversial life of Jon brown. The true character of john brown is as much of an enigma today as it was when he attacked harper ferry with a handful of man. And as it was he sat foot on the grounds at Charlestown and waited with majestic serenity for the drop in to eternity. One thing is indisputable. John brown was motivated by pure ideas. He wanted free the black the black people of this nations to lift the sin of slavery from the consciousness of

Well, I guess someone has to go first and since I’m not at school ever and can type up something during the school day, I guess I’ll go first. John Brown was seen as many things by many people, some thought he was a martyr and a saint, others saw him as an evil, murderous, maniac. While others thought of him as a normal man whose ideas and morals were right, but he tended to get out of hand. If you were a slaveholder in the south in the mid-1800’s you probably hated him, but if you were an abolitionist then you might admire him. Brown’s philosophy seemed a bit askew to how he lived his life. I think that it’s a bit contradictory to advocate that slavery is immoral and an evil sin against God, and then go and break one of the ten commandments and kill five people who support slavery.

A similar definition is used in numerous other contexts of U.S. law as well. A terrorist is an individual who has engaged in terrorist activity or is associated with a terrorist organization. Fundamentally, a terrorist is someone associated with one of a handful of crimes: hijacking, sabotage, kidnapping, blackmail, attacking a protected person, or assassination. Each of those, even without the definition of terrorist, is a crime. In many ways, defending a terrorist is little different from defending anyone else: the attorney is fulfilling his or her duty to preserve an individual’s rights, including a right to due process of law, and to satisfy the axiom that there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. For example in many cases terrorists are only refugees who are regarded as terrorists by their own county so many lawyers only have to do some background research to prove they aren’t what they are accused

Terrorism is the systematic use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of the political aims. The events that have occurred in the 1700's turned the patriots into a party of rebels that began sending alarming threats to the colonists and the King.

To ask a question corresponding to John Brown being a Freedom Fighter or Terrorist is so much as an impossible question to answer. It all depends on your perspective of him. The actions of John Brown’s raid at Pottawatomie Creek and Harpers Ferry were unforgivable; this would be what we the country sees terrorism as.

The federal bureau of investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, and/or any segment thereof." If one makes the argument that BLM is a terrorist group the ideology of the movement must fit within the framework stated above. First, BLM stands for “Black Lives Matter”. It, in itself is nothing more than a concept about which all else revolves. It is true, the “Black Lives Matter” movement has motivates however the motivates of these individuals is what sets them apart from other groups in which has been labeled terrorist. Unlike terrorist groups, “Black Lives Matter” is not an organization based on their ideology, one cannot attach the use of force and violence to the BLM movement, and the movement does not coerce the civilian population.

Making the inference that people are terrorists based on religion and stereotypes. “Terrorism is not always linked to religion (Sterngrass 36).” Also, it is not always linked to race either. Making the inference that race or religion is a terrorist enforces the unnecessary stereotypes. Of course, detaining a person on a race and for just “looking suspicious” is not the way to find out if they are a terrorist. Enforcing stereotypes and detaining anyone for just being here and being rare is not proof and they should not suffer from detainment.

one kind is that of patriot at war. Another kind is that of murderers .He further stated that terrorism is

This is a very limited and narrow framework for terrorism as it doesn’t capture other motives behind an attack. A recent example is the 9/11 attack on the US, Abrahms definition doesn’t capture other motives such as distancing a government from its citizens or strengthening a terrorist group’s own position (Abrams, 2011). Even though it can be argued that he is identifying the most prominent type of terrorism, his definition is similar to military tactics that were used in both conventional and irregular wars (Said, 2011).

According to the stereotypical people of the United States of America, terrorists are individuals who come from foreign countries, specifically the Middle East. They are dark toned males with beards and irascible personalities who reside with the Muslim religion. They are not, however, Christian Caucasian males or females, they are not young students nor “made in America.” However, I disagree with this presumptuous population as a terrorist can be anyone from anywhere, they can as easily be your next-door neighbor or even a long-life friend.