In the movie, there were some differences for example when Moses was going to talk to Pharaoh. Moses wife came with him not Aaron in the Bible. In the Bible, God told Moses that Aaron will help him to talk to the Pharaoh. For Moses in the movie, they want Aaron to think that Moses is a traitor to the Hebrews and Aaron thinks that God is not hearing the Hebrews cries so he gives up. In the Bible, Aaron is helping Moses because Aaron still believes in God. There was a lot of the same thing in the movie and the Bible. When God said to Moses “Take off your shoes Moses you are standing on holy grounds" then Moses took his shoes off. This was in the Bible and the movie because they both what the people to know that God is with you. Wherever you
The film is based on the Biblical book of Exodus, though based on Exodus the film has many flaws. Some of which are the Condition of the Nile, Giza and Rameses, also the burning bush. In the Film Prince of Egypt when a young, dashing Moses is placed into the reeds and water everything goes wrong. There are crocodiles, hippos & boats very nearly hitting him, this scene greatly differs to the Bible as shows that it was hectic. Though in the bible young Moses was put in the reeds and God carried him calmly across the water. Another setting change was the location of the Hebrew camps. In the story of Exodus the camps were in Rameses accordingly, unlike the animation where it was in Giza with the pyramids & the sphinx. The last setting change is the Burning bush; in the Moses narrative the burning bush is calm, quiet & soft. Whereas in the film the burning bush is set in a cold, hard, dark, scary cave with God's voice booming and quieting to creating
A few of these differences changes the focus on a whole different topic for a while. One of these differences is in the beginning, in the book, David’s travel takes two days straight of him walking, but apparently that was too much for them because in the movie his travels were only two miles long. David and Alan met a man trying to trick him that he was dying to steal his money. Another example of how different these are is that instead of just “calmly” fighting and eventually crashing like they do in the book, they were
First off, the biggest difference is the time periods of each movie. The older movie was set in Early Renaissance times. The newer movie is set in the early ninety’s. Another difference is the use of special effects. In the
One of the first and biggest differences is the name of the aliens. In the book, the aliens that they are fighting are called buggers. However, in the movie they are called formics. The second big difference is the fight with Stilson. In the book, Ender fought Stilson outside their school by the buses, and Stilson ended up dying. The movie differs because Ender fights with Stilson
One difference seen as the movie opens is Sunset Towers. In the book, Sunset Towers is a modern, high-class,and rural building on the shore of Lake Michigan,whereas, in the movie, it is a old and rundown building is the heart of a bustling city. Another difference is Jake Wexler’s jobs. In the movie, Jake is gambler, but in the book, he is a podiatrist and a bookie. It is clear that the movie alters the details and characters from the book’s version
A difference one may notice when watching the film was the lack of the Sammy and Dennys. They weren’t that important in the storyline of the book and only were in a couple of chapters which is why I think Disney decided to take them out of the story. Unlike the movie, the book has a lot of religious inferences, illusions, and symbolisms. The book talks about Jesus being one of the fighters against the IT. In the film, Disney takes out all religious references because they want to cater to all religions and races.. Also the movie, says Charles Wallace is adopted but in the book he is blood related to the whole
To start of, the two versions have many similarities. There is a basic story line and plot that the movie keeps in common with the book. All the events happen in the same
The movie and the book have many comparisons from the race, to the crucifixion of Christ. Many similarities include how Judah became a slave, how poetic justice was served, and that Simonides is crippled. In the story, Tirzah and her mother have lepersy, they are healed by Christ, and they get to see Judah again and live in happiness. In the movie and the book, has a man vs man conflict like Messala and Judah were like brothers, they end up fighting and become enemies, Judah and his family are taken prisoners. Another conflict is man vs man when Judah is taken as a galley slave, and the boat is attacked by pirates. A note conflict is man vs self when Judah is going through an internal conflict about Jesus and if He is the Messiah or not. When Tirzah and her mother have lepersy is
Yet another difference is how Henry and Victors relationship develops. In the book, Henry and Victor are childhood friends. Victor initially goes to Ingolstadt alone, but Henry joins him there after several years. In the movie, Victor actually ends up meeting Henry at Ingolstadt. In the book, it creates a special bond between the two characters from childhood, which conveys more devastation to Victor when Henry dies. In the movie, the relationship isn't as aged, yet they do grow close before his
The first difference is the point of view. In the movie, the story is in Turtle’s point of view which makes it harder to understand the whole story. The book is in 3rd person point of view. Although the book is in 3rd person, it still has thoughts from the characters. The movie only has thoughts from Turtle and that makes it hard to understand.
The differences include instead of making their way through a wall/office building as mentioned in the book, Meg, Calvin, and Charles Wallace had to go through a beach. While on Uriel when Meg, Charles Wallace, and Calvin were on Mrs.Whatsit, they were supposed to fly up a mountain, see beautiful human-like beasts who sang beautifully, use flowers to breathe, see the black thing, and start to list some of the greatest warriors of Earth. In the movie when they landed on Uriel, there were flowers who spoke color, they did not fly up a mountain but instead explored Uriel on Mrs.Whatsit’s back, Calvin fell off of Mrs.Whatsit, there were no beautiful beasts, and they didn’t start talking about the great warriors from Earth untill close to the end of the movie. In the book, the Mrs took Meg and the rest to Camazotz on purpose and gave them all gifts, from there they made there way into a town where everyone was in perfect sink with everybody and one kid had messed up bouncing his ball. Meanwhile, in the movie they were trying to tesser back to Earth and it was Meg’s fault they had ended up on Camazotz, only Meg was given gifts, and nobody messed up bouncing their ball. Finally in the book Meg didn’t have a bully/neighbor and she had two younger twin brothers and in the movie Meg did not have any twin brothers and she had a
Several of the scenes were minor and unimportant but, it's the small things that make a big difference. When Jem and Scout find items in the tree they only found soap and a chain with a dog tag on it, in which there is no chain in the book. Several items were missing including: gum, twine, a watch, a medal, and pennies. It was revealed in the beginning of the movie that jem and scout had already obtained these items. Also, in the book Jem and Scout do not see Mr. Nathan Radley cement up the old tree. However, in the movie they do. In the book, when jem and scout find the cemented tree, they feel guilty that they were unable to pay Boo Radley back. When they see Mr. Radley cement up they tree they do not feel guilty, nor as grateful as they should have been. When Atticus is out of town Calpurnia is supposed to take Jem and Scout to her black church. In the movie Calpurnia didn’t take them. They were unable to see Calpurnia’s secret side and they were unable to experience what Calpurnia’s second life was like outside of the
Moses was a leader of the Hebrews and probably the most important figure in Judaism. He led the Hebrew people out of Egypt and into the Promise Land. His story is told in the book of Exodus, and begins when he was first born during the time that the pharaoh of Egypt declared that all male Hebrew babies were to be drowned at birth. Moses’ mother Yocheved, hid Moses and placed him in a basket in the reeds of the Nile River, where he was then found by the pharaoh’s daughter, who kept Moses and raised him as her own. In the story of Moses, he grows up and stumbles upon an Egyptian beating a Hebrew slave. Out of anger Moses murders the Egyptian, and flees to Midian to escape his crime (Hays, 2000). In Midian, Moses rests besides a well,
Another difference I noticed was that in the Bible, it talks about how bad Moses stuttered and that his brother had to speak for him, In the movie though, Moses never stuttered and did all his own speaking in a very confident and steady voice. Also, Aaron shouldn’t be with Moses at the end of the
This was a very detailed film that described the life of Moses depicting the story from the book of exodus. It was an animated biblical film produced by DreamWorks, directed by Brenda Chapman, Simons Wells and Steve Hickner written by Nicholas Meyer and Philip Lazebnik. In many animated films, many actors that do voiceovers has a very childlike voice that appeals to children and The Prince of Egypt has that as well, in this movie Rameses was played by Ralph Fiennes, God and Moses played by Val Kimer, Miriam was played Sandra Bullock and Tzipporah was played by Michelle Pfeiffer. My overall thoughts of the film was it was a very good portrayal of Moses’s story from the beginning to the end of the film when he delivered the people to the promised land the ending of Moses’s story was left out in the film most likey because