Video Surveillance Has Used For Capture Images People Faces

Expansion has occurred throughout the policing system through the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that a police officer cannot perform an illegal search and seizure without a warrant and probable cause (Peak, 2017, p.191). Police officers have expanded their methods such that they do not break the Constitutional rights of the people, but are able to get evidence of probable cause (Sekhon, 2017, p. 74). Police searching cars due to probable cause are an example of this exception. If someone is suspected of drunk driving, the police have a reason to check the car and the person’s sobriety (Sekhon, 2017, p. 71). With the Fourth Amendment, if a person shares information with another or someone that might be considered a third-party, the police may use this information (Crocker, 2013, p. 686). The usage of this information does not technically break the Constitutional rights of the people, therefore is an accepted method (Crocker, 2013, p. 686). Technological advances also make this amendment apply to the expansion of policing methods in more subtle ways (Crocker, 2013, p. 687). GPS tracking and surveillance are both methods used that shows the expansion of policing

Body cameras in policing are still new, but more and more agencies are beginning to implement this technology into their line of work. At first police officers were very hesitant to wear these body cameras because they were afraid they would infringe themselves and give away their own privacy. Later, as body cameras were beginning to see more use in the work place, officers began to realize that these very own body cameras that they once thought would only cause themselves harm would actual prove to be useful in a variety of situations. Some of these situations can be citizen complaints, to even backing up an officers use of force. Body cameras can be the one sole thing that can give

Police officers are starting to wear body cameras . This is a good things because it can then show what real went down, instead of hearing two differnt sides of a story. Now by having police officers wear a body camera you have a visual.

Some will say that body cameras are invading their privacy and they are causing bigger issues, but the statistics show a drop in complaints over the past few years because body cameras are making a big improvement in today’s world. Body-worn cameras are going to continue to be used by police officer’s and they are going to continue to make big improvements. All people who are being recorded should feel safe and comfortable while being on camera and that’s what the police are aiming for. As of right now in the year 2017, body cameras are going to remain on police officer’s and resolve all the issues that are

the cameras that are used today are used to monitor people in a way of protection. For

Everyone is entitled to privacy, especially when it comes to law enforcement. To make the public, and the officers protecting them, feel protected the implementation of body-worn-cameras in the police force is occurring. Sometimes, this equipment malfunctions and ends up doing more harm than the good it promised. When this occurs, a reevaluation of how the cameras are being used should happen to make sure improvements occur. As shown by the recent privacy violations to the Round Lake Police Department regarding body-worn cameras, officers need to become more familiar with the technology they are using and stricter policies about their usage are necessary.

With law enforcement nowadays “it is alright for them to use a device (thermal energy cameras) that can see through the walls of a building or house to spy on someone inside”. It is understandable that law enforcement’s job is to protect and catch bad guys but what about the invasion of privacy to the innocent people?

The White House has recently caught on to the concept of body cameras and has pledged $263 million dollars in federal funding for police training and body cameras. $75 million dollars is set aside specifically for the purchase of 50,000 new body cameras. However, this proposal will only cover a fraction of the 750,000 police officers in America (Source G). The same source says that these camera proposals would cause trouble in states that require public record laws. These laws require every police record not involved in an on-going investigation to be released to the public and there are thousands of hours of footage generated by the cameras every day. This presents a major obstacle in the implementation of body cameras and would require other laws to be revised before even considering implementing

Over the past years, the public and police have not seen eye to eye. Recently, lots of disputes between the police and public have been occurring because there is confusion between their view points. A simple solution for this problem is having police use body cameras so that the public may feel safer knowing that when interacting with police, it is being recorded and can be looked back on in future situations, if needed.

The body cameras the police wear capture everything the police, inside a home, or just the innocent people do. Some people argue that the police have the ability to turn off or choose when they are rolling. What they are not thinking about are about some of the rules or policies the police have. The police should not wear cameras to protect the privacy of everyone. States have laws for what footage can actually be released. These laws are for videos recorded in the police car or any other form of recording (Sullivan). This law should apply the same for body camera footage. If the government were to make policies for the releasing of body camera footage, there would be no purpose to have the cameras. Why this is, is because releasing footage

I was very surprised when I first heard that police officers in certain states of the United States were going to be required to wear body cameras. I was surprised because I thought many people would be against the intrusion of their privacy, and the fears of government intrusion would normally bring fierce debates against the authorities. However, I became even more confused when it became clear that the cameras were not for the surveillance of

There has been lots of talk about police wearing body cameras. It is best that body cameras should be provided with their uniforms. Having police departments using cameras adds benefits, when they know they are being watched, they will be less likely to act up and use force. With the use of cameras we also benefit from many unknown deaths cameras will help general security and citizens from police miss conduct. People can already be tracked through credit cards, transportation passes and ATM transaction. There have been instances

But if that person has a warrant out for them, the cops can do anything to arrest them, such as invade their house. Cops will not go into the house without a reason, if they know that the person is up to something they have the right to enter the house. They have a reason and if they don't, then they will not enter the house unless if they have permission from the rightful owner of the property. So if cops can't invade someone's privacy, then how can the cameras on the cops invade someone's privacy? One of the only reasons a cop would just run into a house is if the person has a warrant or if the person is running from the cop and they run into their house. With cameras it will show that they have a reason to be entering the house, so that prevents the cop from getting in

Our police forces have become center of attention in today’s media; whether it is the constant focus on officer-involved shootings, or the false accusations being made about our police officers and law enforcement agencies, it has raised concerns throughout America. In order to assure fairness to all, there is a new technology being implemented by many law enforcement agencies: The use of body-mounted cameras being worn on all on-duty officers. The benefits of this newly-founded technology are proving to be very promising. These cameras will protect our police officers, assist with many aspects of the investigation process, and most importantly, build good relations with the public. Some argue that these cameras

Law enforcement throughout the United States is looking for ways to mend the broken trust most face with communities. As the news alerts advice more cities and towns are feeling the effects of the mistrust that residents have on police officers. As a result agencies are trying hard to improve the quality of service they provide but also to be more transparent. Therefore, allowing for citizens to have a voice when it comes to the police agencies expectations, accountability, and responsibility. As a result some agencies have turned to the implementation of Body Worn Cameras (BWC).