The Word Iconoclasm refers to the destruction of images or hostility towards visual representations in general. This word more specifically is used for the iconoclastic Controversy that shook the Byzantine Empire for more than 100 years. The Hostility towards religious representations began in 726 when Emperor Leo publicly opposed the icons. The word icon refers to many different things today. "It can refer to graphic symbols in our software and to powerful cultural figures."(Dr. Davor Dzalto). However, the original meaning comes from the Greek meaning for image. In the medieval era, it meant a religious image on a wooden panel used for prayer and devotion. "More specifically, icons came to typify the art of the Orthodox Christian Church. …show more content…
Another theory suggests that the prohibition was an attempt to keep the growing wealth and power of the monasteries. They produced the icons and used them as a primary target of the violence of the Iconoclastic Controversy. Others say the prohibition was religious, and an attempt to correct the right practice of worshiping images. Leo the third's prohibition may have been because of the huge volcanic eruption in 726, thought to have happened because of God's anger over the dedication of the icons. The original theological basis for iconoclasm was weak, they relied mostly on the Old Testament prohibition. But it was clear that it was not absolute because God gave instructions on how to make a three-dimensional Cherubim for the Ark of the Covenant, which was quoted in the Old Testament, a couple of chapters after the passage that prohibits images. Emperor Constantine V gave a slightly different theological approach for iconoclasm. He claimed, " He claimed that each visual representation of Christ necessarily ends in a heresy since Christ, according to generally accepted Christian dogmas, is simultaneously God and man, united without separation, and any visual depiction of Christ either separates these natures, representing Christ’s humanity alone, or confuses
However, the artist used Christian meaning in symbols to celebrate their religion. Such symbols were a piece of garland meant victory over death, a tendril was the Eucharist, a nude figure is Christmas, a peacock is immortality, and a flying bird is a soul flying to heaven.
Christian art and iconography began, about two hundred years after the birth of Christ. Western Christian art and religious iconography was based on the classical art styles and imagery by the Ancient Romans. Medieval art iconography began to relate more to text of the Bible. Religious Christian art was created in the form of illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and fresco paintings adorned churches. The colors of art were generally muted except those used in manuscripts and stained glass windows. Figures varied in sizes in relation their importance. Unlike artists in the Byzantine period who avoided making sculptures at all costs, Romanesque artists made sculptures which were often large, made of stone, and
Shortly after Rome made the transition from pagan practices to embracing Christianity as their formal faith, Christ's depiction in art went through various restorations. Some of the most widely popular illustrations were that of Christ sacrificed on the cross to his ultimate ascension into the Kingdom of Heaven after overcoming death. Since the image portrays Christ in luxurious attire resembling the Roman toga, the viewer can perceive that the mosaic was meant to present Christ in an imperialistic fashion. This is perhaps directed in part to the Byzantine emperors preferring to worship Christ in a way traditional and symbolic of their historical and early customs rather than how he really looked.
Let’s define what is an icon and give a brief history of icons. An icon is sacred art, usually a fresco or mosaic of Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, martyred Saints or scenes from the bible that are given special veneration. This type of sacred art first appeared in the catacombs were the first Christians would gather to worship during periods of persecution. The scenes depicted were of Christ’s family, gospel stories or stories from the Hebrew scriptures. As Christianity began to grow, and after the Edict of Milan the Emperor Constantine decreed that Christians were no longer to be persecuted. In response to this new decree, by the fourth century icons became a way of teaching the Gospel and a way to
Culture was another similarity that the byzantine and Islam's had. Islam is a well-known iconoclastic religion meaning it bands icons and images of religious figures just like Muhammad. The Byzantine empire went through an iconoclast period, motivated by Islamic Iconoclast culture. Emperor Leo III ordered the destruction of religious icons, some that were amazing pieces of Byzantine art. Both Byzantine and Islamic Empires traded on the silk road, which brought cultural diffusion from other areas and was a
The style and iconography of the sarcophagus reflects the transformed status of Christianity. Before the time of Constantine, the picture of Christ was never used directly by important members of the Roman Emperor. In this sarcophagus, Christ represented directly and delivered from Roman Imperial Art perspective. Peter
At the council, 338 members met to rule on the use of images to depict religious figures and ideas. This assembly, including Emperor Constantine and Leo, rules that “the unlawful art of painting living creatures blasphemed the fundamental doctrine of our salvation—namely, the Incarnation of Christ, and contradicted the six holy synods” (Iconoclastic Council, 1). The Iconoclastic Council bans the use of images and pictures to depict religious ideologies and figures because they feared that worshippers honored the image over the actual person, place, or thing represented. To support their argument, the council recalls the Holy Book in which God states, “Thou shall not make thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath…They changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man,…and served the creature more than the Creator” (2). Unlike John, this council uses stronger textual evidence from the Holy Book in order to validate their argument against icons. Furthermore, they argued that “folly” painter constructed the icons to undermine the icons. Council members aimed to demonstrate the icons as evil creations because religious affiliates did not construct them. Nevertheless, the council banned all images, relics, and other representations of
The three treatises by Damascus, are aimed “against those who rejected the use of icons.” Damascus argues that “the theological fact of the incarnation of Christ provides a solid formation for the use of icons in devotion.” Damascus explains many different physical items, such as icons, in worship and adoration. An example of one of the physical items he used as icons is, “Was not the triply blessed wood of the cross matter.”
The exterior of the church is very different from the ones we are used to in the sense that the church itself is vividly painted with all types of icons dating back to the mid 1960s. The tradition for this types of paintings is however rather old and in the orthodox creed these paintings are particularly important because they show the saints for whom the church was erected and whose name they usually take.
Greek Orthodox Church is encompassed by Livingston’s working definition of religion. Every symbol in the Greek Orthodox Church is directly related to that which “sacred value and transforming power.” For example, during our visit to the church, we noticed that the main sanctuary was clearly divided into three sections by a wall with images of saints and icons, which is known as the iconostasis. I learned that the three different sections are the narthex, the nave, and the altar. Upon further research, the iconostasis symbolizes the link between heaven and Earth, the gate which we will one day be able to cross. There are typically paintings of saints and icons on the iconostasis, which that also holds meaning for the church goers. Because this area is typically not accessible by the church goes, it provides a clear indication for what we should strive for: to someday access heaven. Thus, this corresponds to one of the types of theodicies that Livingston presents. Greek Orthodox believe in an other-worldly theodicy. They believe that they will eventually be rewarded after death in another world. During Orthros, only the reverend can be behind the iconostasis. This area, known as the altar or sanctuary, is one of the holiest space within the church and not many are allowed to enter
was wracked by religious and political conflict. And Leo III issued a ban on religious
The Jewish community started Christianity, but Christianity later spread and convert from all over the Greco-Roman world were attracted by this religion during the progress of the first century CE. Ideas, traditions, ways of worship and traditions were brought along by the new convert of Christianity and it was adopted by their faith. This is through art because Christians who were once pagans of the Roman Empire stick to their artistic heritage when they became followers of Jesus Christ. Roman artistic forms and motifs and also Roman architecture were being used by this new convert to express their new faith. In further explanation, we’ll see how Roman art influenced the developing art of early Christians.
Often referred to as Iconoclasm; the act of rejecting, destroying or disowning of religious icons and idols has been a niche human theme throughout history. From the era of the Byzantine Empire, to the German Protestants, Christian iconoclasm seems to spring up in nearly every time period. That being said, instances of the rejection of idols and icons is presented by two rather eloquent texts: The Gothic Idol: ideology and image-making in medieval art by Michael Camille, as well as, The Idol in the Age of Art by Suzanne Preston Blier. The first text mentions idols of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, while the second focuses on idols of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In addition, the iconoclastic movement among German Protestants occurred during the sixteenth century.
The book The Clash of Gods: A Reinterpretation of Early Christian Art reevaluates fundamental pieces of Late Antiquity art, facing off with what author Thomas F. Mathews dubs the “Emperor Mystique,” an inclination to link images of Christ in this period to imperial iconography. In the first chapter, author Thomas Mathews makes a lofty claim: Late Antiquity art blanketed under the Emperor Mystique must be reassessed since art historians have tawdrily abused the theory to oversimplify Jesus’ iconographic identity. The author structures his chapter one argument into three points. First, he criticizes the idea of an unbroken art narrative consisting of a gradual flow from pagan art to Christian art, resulting in the Emperor Mystique mix of imagery as a key transition point. Then, he considers the Emperor Mystique’s prevalence in Late Antiquity. Finally, he moves on to the art historians chiefly responsible for the theory—Ernst Kantorowicz, Andreas
Unlike Medieval painting, Roman painting does not have a specific scene to show nor a particular doctrine to teach. Some scenes might denote the same theme, but the artist tries to individualize his work by playing with the elements. In Romanesque painting the iconographical demands do not allow artists to illustrate the same icons in different ways. To spread Christianity, the symbols need to remain the same everywhere to make the message easier to understand. In Christ in Majesty the halo is an example of the recurring iconographic element. A halo around someone's head means that the person is a saint. Christ, the evangelists, and the Twelve Apostles have halos to point out their religious significance. Individualization is no longer important on Medieval works because artists focus on the expansion of the Christian message.