The Structures Of Health And Social Care Within The British Welfare State

This essay will examine how the development of the Welfare State and the NHS changed the lives of the people of Britain since its introduction in 1948. To enable me to do so, I will analyse and evaluate the key relevant aspects that happened during that period.

For a country to be fully developed and progressive, its objective should be to accommodate and provide the structure to support the needs of its population and also manage the prosperity and happiness of its society. Thus, our nation needs the assistance from the welfare state in order to maintain the stability and structure for the people who are in financial need of it the most.

Examining welfare in the United States it always seems to be a complex and controversial subject. Welfare is directed at various aspects of public policy such as economics, education/training, culture diversity, taxation, incentives, actualization as well as the actual role of the government. The paper will commence by briefly discussing the idea of state welfare system, the origin, development, purpose, and specific view on the way welfare system has undergone changes from the error of Depression. This therefore brings us to the importance of having knowledge on the implication of the 1988 Family Support Act (FSA), the attitude change and policy concerning welfare, as well as the most recent way of focusing to the finding methods of training, retraining or educating individuals in welfare for them to get gainful employment especially those who move to the corporate world.

So, one may argue the creation of the welfare state is the turning point 1830-1948. The term ‘welfare state’ represented a new concept of how the state should relate to the people and was developed by the 1945 Labour government. It was heavily influenced by a report in 1942 -‘Social Insurance and Allied Services’ – published by William Beveridge. The report was a response to the existing problems of poverty as he set out to attack the ‘five giants’: want, squalor, disease, ignorance and idleness. The report produced a comprehensive manifesto of social reform, proposing that the social security system cover the whole population with benefits available to support people facing any crisis disrupting their normal income: unemployment, sickness, disability, death of the

The majority of those who have a reasonably satisfactory understanding of the welfare state will agree that the definition entails; a nation whereby the government undertake appropriate action to ensure the provision of social goods and benefits. These welfare programs are usually provided at public expense with little or no cost to the recipient of the services. Policy prescriptions advanced by proponents of the welfare state emphasise securing a minimum standard of living for all of the population where no one is denied an essential service which might be available to others. This includes the production of social goods and services, the control of the business cycle and the manipulation of total output to allow for social costs

The rationale to reject state responsibility for welfare included; 1) that the welfare state had been “captured” by interest groups (Mendes 2008: 51); 2) that the laws maintaining minimum wages prevents access to jobs for less-skilled and more disadvantaged workers (Mendes 2008: 54); 3) that state welfare programs encourage ‘welfare dependency’ and inhibits self-reliance (Mendes 2008: 54); the notion of mutual obligation (Mendes 2008: 57); and the possibility of private charitable welfare (Mendes 2008: 59). By supposedly protecting people from the cradle to the grave, the ‘passive welfare’ offered by the Keynesian ‘nanny-state’ was thought by neoliberals to undermine the self-reliance and freedom of the individual. The ‘privatisation of responsibility’ can be considered the central principle around which the new moral economy of welfare would revolve (Rogers 2000: 3). In this senses, the individual, rather than society, was assigned the obligation of providing their personal welfare needs in the future (Rogers 2000:

In our country, there are many concerns that the people face in our economy; how are we going to survive? How are we going to provide for our family? How are we going to keep having food at our table or even a place to live in? In many situations, people turn to the government for welfare support. The idea behind the welfare system is to help those in need of assistance. Three main welfare programs that people have acquired and are a concern to the population are: TANF, unemployment insurance and social security.

I believe that social welfare is needed to sustain the health and safety of members in society. In our society, there is often a plethora of individuals who require assistance from the government in order to help with the obstacles that they are facing. My views on this subject matter is consistent with the institutional model rather than the residual model. The problem with the residual model is that it doesn’t take into account uncontrollable forces that may affect an individual’s or family’s living situation as well as employment. For example, the textbook states that “it’s people’s own fault if they require outside help”. (1-3a) This philosophy fails to address uncontrollable factors such as an economic recession or a death in the family.

This essay will discuss the beginnings of the welfare state, the beverage report, the 5 giant evils and their impact social policy had on the development of the National Health Service in post war Britain and today. The national health service was established in 1948, with the focus on an idea to bring good healthcare to all. Nurses, doctors, pharmacists, opticians and dentists were brought together under one umbrella organisation to provide services free to all at point of delivery and based on clinical need, not ability to pay. (NHS 2015)

This paper will focus on Policy and how welfare state changes has impacted on service delivery in the human sector by utilising some articles to answer the provided questions for this assignment.

The second concept is ‘Social provision’. This is the notion that the welfare state is comprised of institutions funded by taxes to aid the general public. The NHS as a health organisation, or the Social Services, the right for tax payers to receive state pension and public education are prime examples of

That provision system was and still is dependent on economic development and further social benefits are income-related. One can say that the modern English welfare state, as it exists now a days, had its hour of birth after the Second World war in the background of comprehensive amendments. Citizens became entitled to certain rights due to the set up of the National insurance, which covered for benefits in case of health, unemployment and disability (BBC) financed out of taxation. Summing up, the English welfare state consists of three main elements namely the guarantee of

Public Services in most developed countries are targeted towards making lives convenient and hence productive. It is safe to say that a comfortable and secure life promises to be a socially and economically prolific life. With regard to this, the United Kingdom has successfully structured a social security system that aims to manage government expenditure and efficient welfare provision with respect to credible claimants. The UK Benefit System is concentrated towards a number of deserving groups such as the unemployed, senior citizenry, disabled individuals, chronically sick individuals or bereaved claimants. (Emmerson & Leicester, 2002) The basic aim of this endeavor is to make lives of British citizens contented enough to ensure a valid level of national contribution and of course give back to the needy. Not only will this help them become more illustrious people but will also go on to pull them out of the unforgiving vortex of vicious poverty.

The welfare state is a system through which a government provides services to its citizens. These social policies are intended to reduce poverty, inequality, and increase economic security (King, lecture, 10/31). Welfare states are generally categorized in one of three ways: christian democratic, liberal, or social democratic. Social democratic states are superior in that they provide the most services, and do so fairly, resulting in a more egalitarian society.

New developments taken together -globalization, European Union integration, aging national populations, major societal changes, technological progress- pointed to the need for a thorough overhaul of state welfare systems and it would have made the countries reform their own welfare systems.[8] It’s just the process to be adapted to the new economic and social conditions.