Discuss the Resource Based Approach to strategic HRM as a better alternative and its managerial implications in terms of HR actions
Submitted by: 120224
Discuss the Resource Based Approach to strategic HRM as a better alternative and its managerial implications in terms of HR actions
The Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) is an approach that defines how the organization’s goals will be achieved through people by means of HR strategies and integrated HR policies and practices. Thus human resource is considered as important asset to organizations to achieve sustained competitive advantage (SCA) and optimize organizational performance. The Resource Based View (RBV) or approach, best explains the human resource as a source of competitive advantage that culminates to superior performance. Therefore, the RBV approach to SHRM in this essay is argued and established as a better alternative from other approaches such as Best practice approach and Contingency approach. Down the line, its managerial implications in terms of HR actions
…show more content…
Thus, management of resources is emphasized more than what product organization produce. So, managers have to manage people in line with organizational systems to achieve goals. Another implication is that competitive advantages can only be explained by human resources. Thus, manager has to integrate HRM practices with strategic management and is essential in order to develop and sustain competitive advantages. Resources are generally complex in terms of imitation or acquisition. Thus, when imitating successful competitors, begin by analyzing market strategies and processes. If these practices are not possible to imitate without new resources, then managers have to determine the possibility of acquiring these
The purpose of this reflective paper is to show my understanding along with what I have learned about HRM (human resources management) and the different way HRM impacts the success behind every business, along with the rules and regulations that go with it. Over the last five weeks I have learned quite a bit about HRM and will reflect on that throughout this paper. “Human resource management is the managing of human skills and talents to make sure they are used effectively and in alignment with an organizations goals.” (Youssef, 2012). I will be including the things I learned throughout the last five weeks in this
In response to criticisms of the ‘best fit’ and ‘best practice’ approaches, the ‘resource based view’ model focuses on leveraging competitive advantage through both tangible and intangible organisational resources. However, questions arise regarding whether there is a best way of achieving strategic HRM. Evidence suggests that firms rarely adopt a single style of management and that it is likely that they use a mix of approaches for different groups (Wilton 2011).
Business environment is facing a rapid change that reminds the business management to focus on its core competencies to survive and sustain in the competitive environment. The core competencies can be developed by strategic human resource management. According to Armstrong (2006) employees are the valued assets for a company. The strategic human resource management is mainly developed in accordance to the fact that human resources need to be managed strategically for the company to enjoy sustainable competitive advantage.
Today 's fast-paced, competitive business environment has resulted in "rediscovery" of the human resource management function as a group that may be able to enhance firm competitiveness and performance by being "strategic" (Dyer & Kochan, 1995; Ulrich, 1997). Strategic Human Resource Management is a term describing an integrated approach to the development of Human Resource Strategy that will enable the organization to achieve its goals (Armstrong, 2005). Whiles strategy is an action that managers take to attain one or more of the organization’s goals. Strategy presents a general direction set for the company and its various components to achieve a desired state in the future. This results from the detailed
Wright and McMahan (1994) define strategic HRM as “the pattern of planned Human Resource deployments and activities intended to enable the organisation to achieve its goals.” A HR function should impact the success of an organisation; a policy must remain current and suitable to both the internal and external environment. Ulrich and Lake (1990) affirm, ‘HRM systems can be the source of organisational capabilities that allow organisations to learn and capitalise on new opportunities.’
The focus on integration of HRM with strategy provides a wider range of solutions to difficult organisational problems and results in achieving a competitive advantage (Lengnick-Hall and Lengnick-Hall, 1998).
Strategic Human Resource Management has been developed to give companies a competitive edge over other companies. Since widespread access to and the use of technology have resulted in tighter margins for maintaining a competitive edge,
The term Human Resource Strategy is well defined as - “Human Resource management (HRM) is a strategic approach to managing employment relations which emphasises that leverage people 's capabilities is critical to achieving sustainable competitive advantage, this being achieved through a distinctive set of integrated employment policies, programmes and practices.” [ Bratton and Gold,4e,p3]
CRITICALLY COMPARE AND CONTRAST THE 'BEST FIT', 'BEST PRACTICE' AND 'RESOURCE-BASED VIEW', MODELS OF HRM STRATEGY AND EXPLAIN HOW EACH APPROACH IS ARGUED TO CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVED ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE.
Strategic human resource management is best defined in line with the original concept of strategic, integrated and coherent approach to employment, development and well being of the people/ personnel working within the organisation ( Armstrong M. , 2012). Boxhall and Purcell (2003) describe HRM as all those
According to (Jay, 1991), the resource-based perspective emphasizes the strategic importance of exploiting internal 'strengths' and neutralizing internal 'weaknesses'. The resource-based model has influenced SHRM by showing the importance of the effective utilization of human resources in order to generate superior performance from employees, hopefully leading to successful delivery of the civil service strategies. By human resources themselves, it was understood the knowledge, skills and abilities of the employees combined with their motivation to put these individual characteristics to use for the benefit of the organization. As well Bach (2004) underlined, resource-based model helped demonstrate the importance of a strategic HR approach
The integrative model of human resource SHRM includes elements of both the control-based and the resource-based SHRM. Desired outcome dictates the elements that will be employed. HR policies can employ elements of commitment, collaboration, traditional and paternal control as needed to support its business strategy. Commitment strategies seek and develop internal talents to meet skill needed. Employees are seen as business partners and competitive advantage agents. Traditional HR and collaborative HR strategies have elements of externally acquiring physical resource or skills. External recruiting in the case of traditional HR strategy and subcontracting and hiring of consultants as part of the collaborative strategy can be used to provide competitive advantages to firms. External talents while providing short term advantages can be a disadvantage in the long term due to cost and potential threat to the firm business. The paternalistic HR strategy provides rewards for employees who learn and follow the company prescriptive directive for success.
There are three major organizational properties: human resources, financial resources and technological resources. HRM is an individual approach to service management which seeks to attain competitive advantage during the strategic deployment of an extremely committed and capable workforce, using a selection of cultural, structural and personnel techniques. (Storey, 1995). From this definition HRM is a mixture of people-oriented management practices that views employees as assets, not costs; and its major aim is to make and maintain a skilful and dedicated workforce to grow competitive advantage. The differences in the
Aim: This research will help us understand the role played by Strategic Human Resources Management in Organizational success, what role a HR manager plays in improving organizational efficiency and how it differs from traditional Human Resources Management.
Within this essay an in depth analysis will be conducted on the difference between Human Resource Management and Strategic Human Resource Management using contemporary perspectives. Human Resource Management (HRM) is the process of managing human resources in a systematic way. It is a practice devised to maximise the performance of employees and is concerned with the application of management principles to manage organisational personnel while paying attention to the policies and systems of the entity (Delaney & Huselid, 1996). Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) is a function of management which entails development of policies, programmes and practices related to human resources, which are aligned with business strategy so as to achieve the strategic objectives of the organisation (Patrick M. Wright, 1992). Its primary purpose is to improve the performance of the business and maintain a culture that encourages innovation and works continuously to gain competitive advantage. In this essay the Resource-Based View, High Performance Management and High Commitment Management perspectives of Strategic Human Resource Management and Traditional and Collaborative