The Middle Ages: Barbaric Times And Intellectual Depression

When you think of something that is dark, you think of it as dreary, lifeless, or even evil. So when you think about the “Dark Ages” you may wonder, were times really like that? With a lot of research and patience we have come to find out that that time, may have been completely opposite. Not much came out of the Middle Ages but there sure was innovation. The people of this era were definitely not dreary or evil so no, ‘the Dark Ages’ is not an appropriate term to describe the Middle Ages.

The time period spanning from around 500 A.D. to 1500 is perceived as the Dark Ages. Many plagues, wars, lack of knowledge, corruption, prosecution, and lack of freedoms were a part of the early Dark Ages. Many people tend to focus on these things and do not learn that many important things came from this time. The lengthy list following is some of the positives from the Dark Ages: universities, banking, Christianity, guilds, science, Carolingian Renaissance, Byzantine Golden Age, Islamic Golden Age, Commercial Revolution, mathematics, art, architecture, improved weather conditions, improvement upon laws, agricultural boom, the printing press (a fundamental part of journalism today), theater, Islam, and impressive leaders. The Dark Ages were not as dark as they are generally made out to be, for the art/architecture, agriculture, and the sciences/mathematics of that time, awe and impact today’s world.

Document 1 and Document 6 both provide supporting evidence that lead to why the Middle Ages should be referred to as the Dark Ages. Document 6 states, “Europe suffered a decline in commerce and manufacturing, in education, in literature and the arts, and in almost all that makes possible a high civilization. Cities grew smaller and in some cases practically disappeared, and western Europe became a region of poverty-stricken farming communities, each virtually isolated from the rest of the world.”

The idea of the “Dark Ages” came from historians who were seriously biased toward ancient Rome. This negative opinion of the so-called “Dark Ages” became widespread because most of the printed records of this time had a dominant Rome unfairness. The term refers to the lack of cultural improvement in Europe. Honestly, living in the Early Middle Ages was not really that much darker or more vicious in comparison to any other eras. The era that followed was just as dark with no great leaders appearing, no scientific accomplishments being made, and no great art being produced; therefore, the period from the fall of the Roman Empire to the rise of the Renaissance should not be considered “The Dark Ages.”

The word "dark" usually hints to death, dullness, or lifelessness. In this way, when one describes the Middle Ages as the "Dark" Ages, it is most likely expected that the time wasn't precisely the most magnificent of times. As opposed to this, the Middle Ages were the complete antithesis. While the early Middle Ages were generally peaceful as far as the knowledge that history books provide, the period was loaded with new thoughts and lively developments. This is not advocated by the expression: "Dark Ages."

There is much evidence to suggest that Middle Ages Europe should also be known as the “Dark Ages” in European history. First, there was no government. There were kings, but they did not make common people’s life better. Kings owned all land, which was unfair compared to other empires, and gave land to the vassals for their power, not for the common people. King and few nobles only had a political power, and even many of them did not have a good life. World History textbook shows that only sons of nobles had a possibility to be knights. Even though most of the knights wanted to be a lord, they could never became a lord, and they fought for wars for their entire

In conclusion, the Dark Ages, in a negative connotation, is a completely appropriate term for the Middle Ages. The English were corrupt, as shown by the examples of Joan of Arc and King John. Many people think of the Dark Ages was an era of cruelness and evil. It was and I think the name Dark Ages is appropriate for this

Firstly the dark ages was a very hard time. There was too much fighting. The romans were attacked, robbed, and taken over by barbarian tribes. The period that was following the fall of Rome were The Dark Ages. Also people didn’t help eachother out. Roman cities even declined because workers stopped maintaining water and sewage systems. All over Europe bad things happened. The Angel’s and saxons even chopped people’s hands off and their noses for punishment.

The Dark Ages is a period of time created from the Western Roman Empire’s destruction. The fall of a massive empire made a hole in history because during this time no writings, art, or leaders were born. People were stuck in a void where not a single advancement is made. No civilization or city group will show until the Middle Ages, or medieval period.

The dark ages overall, were a time where population began to decline due to the plague of Justinian, where religion began to sprout, and frequent warfare over around 600 years.

After the fall of the Roman empire, Germanic tribes, such as the Visigoths, Vandals, Saxons, Franks, etc. pushed to claim the land. This period of time is called the “Dark Ages” for many reasons. An example for the name is the decline in education and intellect, but there are many more reasons as to this nickname, none of them referring to a lack of sunlight. However, it’s the decline of many important aspects like freedom, peace, education, age expectancy, etc. These few things made up a small part of the “Dark Ages”.

When you hear "dark ages" what is the first thing that appears in your mind? well for me i consider something frightening and dark and mean. Well the "medieval times" is the complete inverse. There was very little stuff that left the medieval times yet the majority of the individuals were upbeat and grins and exchanging and purchasing products!!! so when you think about the medieval times you ought to think about all that i simply portrayed. I don't imagine that the dark ages is a decent name to call the medieval times.

The dark ages were not really dark. There were many positive things that developed at this time. People developed culturally and intellectually. The reasons the dark ages were not really dark are this age saw scientific foundations laid, art and architecture and religious unity. Education institutions made scientific foundations possible because people began to learn and they could apply the learnings in their scientific research.

The final reason the dark ages were dark was the black plague. The black plague was a daise spread by the mongols when they used biological warfare. According to Black Death “Black Death would kill more than 20 million people in Europe–almost one-third of the continent’s population” (History channel, 1). This means about 33% of the population in europe was killed because of the black pluege. This is dark because lives were taken by the same disease and nobody in the middle ages did anything to stop it. If 20 million lives were taken then the middle ages should be classified as

Over the years historians had agreed and disagreed over the though of the middle ages being a dark and less civilized time. It was classified as dark because learning new things wasn’t a part of their daily activities. They didn’t lack intelligence, but they never had a reason to design aircraft or anything as intricate in that matter. However, their focus was to bear ground provisions and maintain sustainability. The focus back then was to live. The myth that the “dark ages” was dark is the truth, but it is not true that it was relieved from the shadows after the renaissance. The upbringing of the people started way before the renaissance. Because the goal back then was to survive they had to eat and to eat they had to grow what they