The Proper Voting Age Recently, there has been some debate whether the voting age should be lowered from 18 to 16, in an attempt to increase voter turnout. Yes, it may succeed in that but I believe the most important thing beyond voter turnout is educated voting. How much of the age group of 16 and 17 year olds follow politics closely enough to make an educated decision? Many younger voters are influenced by their parents; it would just encourage people to have more children to give them more votes in a particular election. That may sound ridiculous to some but for something such as the Presidential election it is a possibility. However, for the sake of argument let's assume giving the power to vote to people at
I belive that before se set out to make major changes to the voter laws, such as changing the voter age requirment, new programes should be rolled out in an attempt to increase younger voter turnout fist. For example, use of social media to target younger voters. More political ingagment with a younger age group would help build on itself as polititions engage and take up issues that matter to yonger voters, thus incressing young voter turnout, and thus raising the value of younger voters to polititions seeking ideas and votes to be elected or re-elected. a prime example is how effective it was for Bill Clintons campaign during the 90's when he appealed to young voters by going on "MTV."
Interest groups and lobbyists’ would make assumptions about the voting age. Is voting at eight-teen fair? What would happen if sixteen year olds could vote? Getting people to think about and analyze a problem leads them to get others to think about the same problem which makes the idea grow in popularity.
By lowering the voting age from 18 to 16 some people suggest improvement of voter turnout. On the other hand the problem is that by doing this there would be a decrease in the participation percentage. Most of the younger people would not take the time to vote; much less take the time to understand what they're voting for.
“Even a small amount could make a difference” ( Miller). Thus saying that those 90 preadolescents alone could incidentally cause either miss-representation or unjust voting; thus, these kids will not be able to politically identify themselves based on their beliefs since most will be heavily influenced by both their parents’ and their peers’ desires and beliefs. Although an increase in voting is needed, lowering the age range is not the answer. Politicians could try other methods such as “having an issue on the ballot, and having the resident decide,” says Schultz. Simply lowering the voting age to say, “ we were the first” will not justify the consequences. So overall, no, sixteen and seventeen year olds should not be allowed to
here's no doubt that voting is a serious responsibility granted to all Canadians. Some Canadians practise this privilege as well as right, while others take it for granted. Since the 1970's, voting turnouts has been decreasing dramatically reaching 55% in the 2000's. Eventually, less than half the population will be voting which is not good for a developed democratic country. Therefore, I strongly believe that the government should lower the voting age to sixteen-year-olds instead of eighteen-year-olds. Mainly because middle adolescents are knowledgeable enough nowadays to contribute with the society. Moreover, if these young agers get into the habit of voting in such an early age, they'll always go to vote. Consequently, politicians will care more about young age people
In the most recent election in 2016 only 59% of Americans voted. Many people today see this as a major issue; however, a major argument has risen on how to solve this problem. One of the solutions that have been considered is lowering the voting age to 16 to get younger Americans votes. However many Americans think that this is crazy to allow 16 and 17 year olds to vote. The clear and only answer to this contentious question is that 16 and 17 year olds should not be able to vote. As stated before 16 and 17 year olds should not be allowed to vote because sixteen and seventeen year olds are not mature enough, their opinions can be easily swayed or changed based on what others think, and they are not educated enough on politics in order to vote.
Voting is a fundamental right and in many countries it is even mandatory for every citizen to vote. The question raised is that a legal age for voting should be increased from 18 to 21 or not.
We should maintain the required age to vote at 18, because young people do not get out and vote. In 2012, only 38% 18 - 24 year olds even voted, lowering the voting age down to 16 would only bring our participation percentage even further down. Having a 16 year old vote also raises a lot of questions rather their votes were influenced by older people or just who their friends are going to vote for. I think we should maintain our voting age at 18 because older people are more likely to pay attention to politics and understand what they will need from a candidate.
Furthermore, when voting in an election the voter must have knowledge and interest to support their vote. Like it stated in the newspaper article, "In, 2012, 62% of the youngest voters showed disinterest in the political process by not voting." Which means that the 16-18 group would have
Some people have called for lowering the voting age from 18 to 16, claming it would improve voter turnout. This could be a real problem in US. Discussions about lowering the voting age distract from the real problem.
Keep the Voting Age at 18 is better for us because most younger voters do not bother
Lowering the voting age would decrease the numbers of voters. Many teenagers do not bother to vote at all. According to the first article Keep the voting age at 18, includes that "Only 38% of voters in the 18_24 age group voted in 2012. By contrast, close to 70% of older voters participicated." This shows most younger voters lack of interest of voting. Another reason, the 16-18 age group young
I believe that the voting ages should be raised from 18 to 25. At 25 a person would have more experience in life than at the tender age of 18. Also at the age of 25 a person would have a much better understanding of politics , so that a person
For one I think some if not most of the younger voters may not care at all about politics and voting. Some may not even understand. I sure know when I sixteen I didn't understand the greater details of voting and why its very important to make sure you vote because it a vote you believe in and may think it will do everyone better. In the passage " Keep voting age at 18 " the numbers show that only 38% of voter of the age of 18-24 voter compared to the 70% of older voters. Lowering
Have you ever had a time when you felt that your voice was ignored? Legal Voting age should be lowered to the age of 16. As a young Canadian citizen there has never been a greater time to change the legal voting age to 16. How come we let unknowledgable adults vote, but not smart engaged teens. Teen voices get blocked out while the adults keep talking. If we as a society change our voting age to 16 many positive outbursts will occur, For example, Voter turnout will increase, teens will be more engaged in politics and the world around them, and finally young people will earn a chance to speak up and say who would run their future the best. All of these will happen and most likely even more.