The system of higher education in America could be in trouble. Due to dramatic change in what society values, they could soon be under attack. In the two articles that I analyzed, these issues were discussed in further detail. The first article was titled, “The Future of College” and was written by Graeme Wood. Its purpose was to draw attention to a new approach at education. The second article, “The Troubled Future of Colleges and Universities”, written by Gary King and Maya Sen, focused on the obstacles that universities are facing and gave suggestions of ways to overcome them. Along with this, both articles, addressed what education may look like in the future. With the development of technology and information from new studies, many wonder what the outcome could be. Will lecture style classes remain? Could higher education convert to a completely online experience? What is the most effective teaching method? In the first article, Wood argues for a completely online education. Whereas, the other article believes that universities need to focus on the importance of research. However, students learn in different ways, therefore, today’s higher education institutes should offer a variety of instructional methods. There are seven general styles in which people learn: visual, aural, verbal, physical, logical, social, and solitary. Visual learners prefer pictures and images. They are most successful with art programs, and by relating the content to pictures. Aural learners
Two professors of different backgrounds, Mike Rose of California, and Gerald Graff, of Illinois, discuss the problems college students face today in America. Though similar in slight variations, both professors view the problem in different regards and prepare solutions that solve what they feel to be the heart of this academic problem.
America’s education system has been in a state of distress for the past decade, but garnished headlines recently as the student loan debt crisis reached over a trillion dollars. In conjunction with that, tuition is no longer the only obstacle a student faces when considering their future. As generations come and go, universities have slowly, but surely, been angling their education in a way to favor profit over knowledge. Because of the new direction higher education models are taking, Magdalena Kay questions her readers, “is there a problem with students, with teachers, with administrators, or maybe
Graeme Wood’s “The Future of College?” (The Atlantic, September 2014) analyzes a new style of higher education. Woods experienced a new high tech style of higher education developed by Ben Nelson as a replacement for brick and mortar colleges. Nelson’s new age high tech concept for higher education is called the Minerva Project. The Minerva Project is an attempt to maximize student learning in a high tech environment, eliminating all the so called unnecessary aspects of a traditional college and focusing on higher education.
In the essay, Friedman makes an effort to compose his arguments in a professional and reasonable way. Referencing to historians and scholars such as Walter Russell Mead, and examples such as San Jose State utilizing M.I.T. online course from miles away, Friedman lays out the current situation where technologies make accessing information and using detailed analysis, Friedman reveals the necessity of revolutionizing universities. Because of the world values “what you know” more than “how you know it”, that university education seems less efficient in preparing their students ready for the job market and the dimensions beyond the campus. The detailed and rigorous analysis in this piece is one of the key reasons why it is highly persuasive. Friedman expands on the idea of “MOOC’s revolution” and reasons that under the new “competency-based” environment, the vivacious course load of post-secondary education is somewhat outdated, antiquated.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
According to “ Got Style.”, a survey generated by West Virginia department of Education, “visual learners are the most common type of learners.” Visual learning is the transmission of information and ideas using symbols and image. It is one out of three main types of learning styles. We use all our senses to gather information. Some people used one sense one more than others while learning .
From the reading of week 8 Lecture 1 “Learning Styles”, I agree with the second sentence in the last paragraph, where it says that people can be a combination of more than one learning style. I feel that I learn from both a visual and kinesthetic learning. First, I like illustrations that incorporate the use of pictures and diagrams, it helps to stimulate my mind and aids in understand of what is going on. Frequently write things down that I feel is important and want to remember later, as well as see demonstrations of how things are done to understand them better. When I am doing my course work I have to go to my office at home facing the opposite direction of the window, as the window in the room is a huge distraction for me. Often I use
I knew there had to be more than just solitary and visual learning methods so I went further into the topic and researched learning methods in greater detail. I found out that there are seven different types of learning methods.Visual (spatial), aural (auditory-musical), verbal (linguistic) physical (kinesthetic), logical (mathematical), social (interpersonal), solitary (intrapersonal).Visual learners prefer using pictures, images, and spatial understanding. Aural learners prefer using sound and music. Verbal learners prefer using words, both in speech and writing. Physical learners prefer using their bodies, hands and sense of touch. Logical learners prefer using logic, reasoning and systems. Social learners prefer to learn in groups with other people. And lastly solitary learners prefer to work alone and use self-study. ("Overview of Learning Styles." Overview of Learning Styles. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 July
According to the results of the Learning Preferences Survey, my preferred learning style is Visual/ Verbal. I had a total score of 18 in the visual/ verbal column which was actually the highest in the perceptual learning preferences survey that I took. The visual/ verbal learning style is an indication that I prefer graphical organization to access and understand new information in addition to avid reading and note- taking. The second learning style in the perceptual learning preferences was tactile/ kinesthetic in which I had a total score of 16. This learning style involves using one’s body, hands, and sense of touch. The visual/ nonverbal and auditory learning styles, on the other hand, tied with 13 points. The visual/nonverbal
If college is seen as the final milestone in American culture where one transitions from an adolescent to an adult, college must prepare them for the real life. In many unprivileged societies, going to class on a campus may not be a luxury they can afford. That’s where online education comes in as an exciting alternative. Colleges and universities should offer more fully online courses because it can benefit tech savvy students, busy scheduled students, and students with physical or social disorders. Online courses are stress-free and with online tools it is much easier to learn at their pace. Whether they have to work during the day, or take care of a child, going to strictly scheduled events may not be an option for them. Therefore, to be able to complete their education online on their own time, may be the more practical approach to maintain their current living standard.
There are three main learning styles which are Visual, Auditory and Kinaesthetic. The three of these are different ways of how you prefer to learn, and how you consume information efficiently.
In today’s society, the field of higher education has drastically changed with advances in technology and shifts in the economy. As a result, universities and colleges continue to layoff employee and make budget cuts. As Greenwald (2012) states universities are entering an era of continuously “taking things away from people" (para 2). As a result, a drastic change in the design and implementation of teaching and curriculum must be addressed in the field of higher education. Universities should not be just a place to take out student loans to for pay a degree and graduate, but rather a place of involvement and engagement (Helfand, 2013). Therefore, a university’s framework must be re-designed and implemented, however, the perspective from which educators teach must also change. They should not be seen as just lecturers, but rather teachers who inspire, engage and involve their students. This would not only entail a few changes to a university’s curriculum but its entire institutional structure.
The higher up education in the United States has always excelled as one of the best around the world. Many of the learning methods that are used nowadays in colleges and universities are a lot similar to the ones used in past generation. A variant that nowadays affects not only education but also our lives in general is the technology that we have at our disposal. Technology is the next step of education so much so that many higher up educational system are trying to implement technology Despite budget woes, the report shows many colleges are moving forward with plans for new technology in several areas (Kaya, 2010). For many there is still no clear way of seeing the benefits of implementing more technology in the classroom, technology remains a disruptive innovation—and an expensive one (The economist, 2008).
41). There are three learning style: Auditory: prefer to learn by hearing; Visual: prefer to learn by seeing; and Kinesthetic: prefer to learn by doing. According to Dunn, Denig, and Lovelace (2001) learners are influenced by twenty one elements although not all learners are affected by all 21, most are affected by six to fourteen elements. These twenty one elements that affect learners are classified into five different variables: Psychological: perceptual, intake, time and mobility; Environmental: sound, light, temperature and design; Emotional: motivation, persistence, responsibility and structure; Sociological: self, pair, peers, team, adult and varied and Physiological: global/analytic, hemisphericity, and impulsive/reflective. By identifying each learners learning style teachers and learners can capitalize on the learner’s strengths and weaknesses. Most learners have a primary learning style however it may not be the only learning style that learner has. Some learners have a secondary learning style which can be used to reinforce initial learning.
Learning styles are biologically and developmentally set of personal characteristics that make the identical types of instruction affective for some