Summary Of Social Equality Act Of 1964

In 1964, the Civil Rights Act was created to address discrimination in education, employment, and voting. The law was created in the midst of civil rights protests breaking out all over the country. The act was under heavy opposition when it was first created, and hung in jeopardy of being lost when JFK was killed in november of 1963. But in 1964, the Civil rights act was finally passed. And in this act was The Equal Opportunity laws.

All it took for a teacher was inspiration, a vision, and a pen on paper. President Lyndon B. Johnson was an educator that took an unexpected turn to alter history. But through the course of his legacy, people ask, why did he sign the Civil Rights Act of 1964? He signed the bill for principle reasons because of the emotions from his past career, his bravery to sacrifice, and because of his personality and background (DOC A, C and E).

President Lyndon B. Johnson and President John F. Kennedy made many notable advances to outlaw discrimination in America. They fought against discrimination on race, color, religion, and national origin. Although the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments outlawed slavery, provided for equal protection under the law, guaranteed citizenship, and protected the right to vote, individual states continued to allow unfair treatment of minorities and passed Jim Crow laws allowing segregation of public facilities. America would not be the country it is today without their effort to make this country better and of course without the help of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The Eros Lodge and the Eros Bar and Grill, under the scope of the law, are directly involved in interstate commerce. They are a public hotel and restaurant and open to both local citizens and citizens traveling from out of state. While their clientele may consist primarily of locals, it does not mean that out-of-state travels cannot or would not stay there. Mr. Bates, the owner, did not say he didn’t rent to travelers from out of state, he only said he wouldn’t rent to same-sex couples. However, since interstate commerce is defined as travel, trade, traffic, transportation, or communication among several states, his establishments fall under its domain – and therefore have no right to be excluded from the Equal Access Act. Discriminating against

Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation in the United States was commonly practiced in many of the Southern and Border States. This segregation while supposed to be separate but equal, was hardly that. Blacks in the South were discriminated against repeatedly while laws did nothing to protect their individual rights. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ridded the nation of this legal segregation and cleared a path towards equality and integration. The passage of this Act, while forever altering the relationship between blacks and whites, remains as one of history's greatest political battles.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was known as an end to racial segregation. It was brought about by a number of things including the effects of major events mostly involving riots. State and federal legislation needed it to be passed along with many social movements that influenced its decision. It is no question that it heavily changed America for the better by turning us into a melting pot and making us see that everyone should be treated as equals. It is important to remember that this act was not only beneficial to the time in which it was enacted, but it has affected our future by sustaining society. Today we continue to fight to outlaw discrimination within our nation, and thanks to the passing of this act we are able to be strong and help support the removal of unequal protection for all citizens. The general public has always deserved to be treated with the same rights that every White American is given. This act needed to be passed in order to see the harm we were causing by segregating people. America has grown so much since the act was established, and with it by our sides everyone can be able to have the rights they all truly deserve. Without this act in effect, the impacts on our country would be dire. We needed this act in order to flourish as one nation and continue to build movements against any discrimination.

In 1964, the Economic Opportunity Act transpired which included quite a lot of organizations like Job Corp, Vista, and Project Head Start. The top organization listed above is Project Head Start created in the year 1965. The plan is to help children ages three to five years old of low income families. The goal and attention remains to introduce these young kids to an early start to education, to help with thinking skills, as well as academic skills, good nutrition, health services, and parent involvement to make them successful in the future. The program not only helps children but aids in helping the family as a whole. For example, a number of parents are taught the English language; others learn to read. Head Start also assists family members

In 1863, Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address defined the American government as an institution “of the people, by the people, [and] for the people”. Lincoln had an idealistic view of the government as an instrument for societal change. He, as well as the founding fathers, intended for the government to act in support of the people’s will or the majority rule. This democratic definition of the government has remained true throughout the course of American history. By placing all of its power on its citizens, the government itself did not decide the course of history but rather followed it. This follower mindset is seen through the government’s positive interactions with marginalized groups’ who in their attempts to overcome exclusion gained

Back in the fifties and sixties there were many prejudice and racist people in America. They would discriminate whoever was different or whoever they did not like. Many of those different people had their limited rights violated or infringed. So therefore in order to stop all of that nonsense, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed an act to stop it. I know that the reason why Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was because of his principle. The three reasons why was because he felt compassionate for the Mexican Americans that he taught, he risked losing the election just to keep the Civil Rights Act of 1964 alive, and he felt strong about keeping the Civil Rights Bill.

Before JFK was killed he was trying to get the Civil Rights act passed. The Civil rights actof 1964 was a bill that expanded voting rights, strengthened equal employment opportunity, and guaranteed all americans the rights to use public facilities. After JFK was murdered LBJ became president and was willing to do anything to stay at the level he was on. Do you think politics was the reason LBJ signed the civil rights act billof1964?

America is treasured because of its ability to offer equal opportunity to all people, no matter what race, gender, or religion. However, America’s prized equality has not been available all through the country’s lifespan. Many acts and laws have had to be put in place in order to create an egalitarian country. The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 both were both created on the same topic: creating a fairer country that provided equal opportunities to all. Essentially, they work hand in hand, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 provided equal opportunity and rights to those with parents born in other countries, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited any sort of prejudice or discrimination concerning sex, religion, and race.

Alvarez and Moser explore the problem of discrimination in the large company Walmart. Many female employees claim were their discriminated against in the workplace and sued the company for the unfair treatment in salary and promotion. This article shows the information of lawsuit cases for large company. The company had more awareness suing from the employee and needed to prevent it. I will use this source for backing ground for my argument. It shows 500,000 female employees files for the lawsuit in pay and promotions in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This evidence should help me to improve my argument for discrimination in the workplace. Busteed shows that the different performance between female athletes and male athletes after graduating from college. Gallup-Purdue Index, shows that formal female athletes do better perform in their career than male athletes do. This data show how the female athletes participate in work activities and have a great achievement in the workplace and usually have a positive aspect in their sports and life. I will use this source for valid conditions of rebuttal. People might think male students perform better than female, but female are better than male students. Covert explores how women are discriminated against in the workplace. He shows 30 percent of women had the discrimination problem by using a new poll data from the Center for American Press and Elle Magazine. The different pay gap between men and women still

“This Civil Rights Act is a challenge to all of us to go to work in our communities and our states, in our homes and in our hearts, to eliminate the last vestiges of injustice in our beloved country”, this quote from Lyndon B. Johnson truly represents how difficult it was to get to the civil rights act and how hard it was once it was passed. Many cases were apart of this act that played a big role at the U.S. Supreme Court. It wasn't only race that the civil rights act of 1964 ended it also ended segregation in race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Civil rights act was a big movement effecting so many people: Dred Scott v. Sanford, Plessy v. Furguson, and Brown v. Board of education.

Women are continually being overlooked for promotions and additional projects in the workplace for the same reasons. Employers assume that women with families have other obligations, so they won’t consider those women for additional responsibility. Because of this, women aren’t even given the opportunity of job advancement and the opportunity to compete with men in the workplace.

One law that I do see broken in this assignment is the “Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.” It’s very unnecessary and unprofessional to ask any applicant how they are going to take care of their child while they are at work which would make it very discriminatory. If the applicant meets the criteria and experience plus having a child, then the managers should have no right to treat the women any different or not find the female qualified during the hiring process.