Star Appliance Case Study
Situation:
Star Appliance is looking to expand their product line and is considering three different projects: dishwashers, garbage disposals, and trash compactors. We want to determine which project would be worth doing by determining if they will add value to Star. Thus, the project(s) that will add the most value to Star Appliance will be worth pursuing. The current hurdle rate of 10% should be re-evaluated by finding the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). Then by forecasting the cash flows of each project and discounting them by the WACC to find the net present value, or by solving for the internal rate of return, we should be able to see which projects Star should undertake.
Conclusion:
…show more content…
The current year is 1979, so from Exhibit 3 the 1980 dividend is forecasted to be $1.70, and the stock price in 1979 is $22.50. This gives a dividend yield of 7.56%, which is added to g. There are four ways to solve for g:
Dividend Growth Rate: Using the dividend schedule data in exhibit 6, g = 4.46%
Capital Gains Yield: I was able to find the stock prices by multiplying the P/E ratio times EPS, both of which are found in exhibit 6. g = 1.90%
EPS Growth Rate: These values are also found in exhibit 6, leading to g = 5.55%
Reinvestment Returns: I found "b" (the reinvestment rate) by using exhibit 1 to calculate the percentage of net income per share of common stock that is paid out in dividends, and subtracting it from 1 to solve for the percentage reinvested. The return on equity, "k", is found by dividing net income (exhibit 1) by book value (exhibit 2). G = b*k shows g = 8.14%.
Now to find the return on equity (ROE), I chose to add the average of the Dividend Growth and the Earnings Per Share Growth and use that as g. I decided that the Capital Gains Yield was much too low compared to the other values of "g" that I found and should be discarded from further calculations, considering it to be an outlier. The Reinvestment Returns yielded a value for "g" that is a little on the high end, but it is only based on
4) Using the stock price and return data in Exhibits 5 and 6, estimate the CAPM beta
At the new WACC of 19%, the home appliance and agricultural machinery projects are valued based on their inherent levels of risk. The beta of the industry average home appliance project is 0.95, whereas the beta for the industry average agricultural machine project is calculated as 0.88. CAPM was then employed to find the cost of capital of each project. The cost of capital for the home appliance and agricultural machinery projects were found to be 10.4% and 9.92%, respectively (Appendix B). This analysis allows Star Company to allocate funds to projects that create returns greater than the industry cost of capital for each specific project.
2. 2010 Payout = $3,600,000/$10,800,000 = 0.33 = 33% 2011 Dividends = (0.33)(2009 Net income) = (0.33)($14,400,000) = $4,800,000 (Note: If the payout ratio is rounded off to 33%, 2011 dividends are then calculated as $4,752,000.)
Rate of return on Net Sales: This ratio determines a company’s profit margin on sales. Your company wants a higher number as that shows your company is more profitable. To determine this ratio take the net income and divide it by the net sales. In Year 12 Company G has a return has 6.53% and Year 11 the return was 5.43%. The rate increased by 1.1% over the course of the year. The ratio is showing between the upper and median quartile. This is showing no concern at this time.
Return On Common Stockholders ' Equity: measures profitability of owner investment by subtracting preferred dividend from net income and dividing by average common stockholder 's equity.
What is the cash dividend yield on the Common Stock? (provide formula, data inputs and product.)
8-18 Dividend Growth Annual dividends of General Electric (GE) grew from $0.66 in 2001 to $1.03 in 2006. What was the annual growth rate?
When combining the figures for ROE, ROA and the DuPont analysis it appears that the company is using leverage favourably. ROE is greater than ROA and assets are greater than equity. This is a positive sign for shareholders as it suggests a good investment return in a company that is managing its shareholder equity well (Evans & McDowell, 2009).
One of them is CAPM. However, Linda wants to calculate the cost of common equity by growth rate. In order to calculate, we need to know growth rate of dividend, last year dividend amount and stock price. At the very beginning, I calculate the dividend amounts for last 10 years by multiplying Earning per Share by dividend payout ratio (0.3). Then, I find out the average of the growth rate for last 10 years to use that rate as company’s growth rate (Table 1). The reason for finding adjusted dividend is that it is not possible for company to have negative dividend. It is expected the company’s growth rate would be 125 percent of that experienced from 1988 to 1998. So, I found growth rate as 7.799%. So,
In addition, the rate of return since Dec 9 1998, after CC distributed 7.32 million UBID shares to its shareholder, is 5.72% calculated as following:
Return on Equity = Net Income / Shareholder's Equity. Net income in 1960 is $752,000 and shareholder’s equity is the common stock plus the retained earnings (1,800,000 + 3,256,000. Therefore, return on equity = 14.87%. With their Long-Term notes at 5.5%, the rest of their liabilities would
Return on market = (final index value - initial index value) / initial index value
Using the Du Pont System of Analysis, which is net income divided by the stockholders’ equity, the percentage of return on stockholders’ equity for 2000 is 67%, and for 2001 is 33%.
Range of values per share is from $67 to $83 per share. This is in range of Greenhill's own calculations.
The payout ratio is set at .30 from 2006 onwards. Notice that the long-term growth rate, which settles in between 2011 and 2012, is ROE × ( 1 – dividend payout ratio ) = .10 × (1 - .30) = .07.