Perhaps one of the most difficult realities a Christian must face when reading the Old Testament is the God of Justice—who ordered the death of women and children, and even killed the firstborns of Egypt by His own hand—and then reconcile Him with the God of great Mercy who gave us Salvation by dying for us on the cross. One such passage is found in the Book of Exodus 11:1-10 and 12:29-32 in which, “The Lord struck all the first-born in the land of Egypt, from the first-born of Pharaoh who sat on his throne, to the cattle.” The Church’s many theologians in the Early Church, Medieval Church, and Modern Church addressed this particular passage. Between these centuries there was a tendency between two extremes, one being a figurative interpretation …show more content…
Amongst the great thinkers of this time, most only referenced the death of the firstborn by God in regards to the correlation between the blood of the lamb sparing the Israelite children and Christ’s blood sparing us from death by sin. However, it can be logically concluded based on direct statements and arguments made by these theologians, that the passage was considered literal. One theologian in particular who directly addressed the passage was St. …show more content…
Thomas Aquinus would agree that it really was God who killed the firstborn of Egypt based on an argument made in his Summa Theologica. While not directly referencing to the passage, he argues that although it may seem in certain Scripture passages God acts or orders others to act in a way contrary to virtue, He does not because that would be against His nature. In fact Thomas establishes the justness of God taking a life because “He is the author of life and death.” Therefore, to take the passage literally would not be regarded as unjust or contrary to God’s nature, because life was a gift given to man in the first place, not a right that we
St. Jean Baptiste Roman Catholic Church and its place of worship in New York City is considered for reviewing under the topic for this week's discussion. This congregation is awarded under the Roman Catholic Church outlined and was additionally worked to serve the necessities of the French Canadians communities. The congregation is connected with the Roman Catholic confidence and with understanding to withstand and keep up administrations with the Roman Catholic Confidence worldwide, yet as opposed to their noticeable quality in the New Britain factory towns. Despite the fact that the St Jean Baptiste Catholic Church likewise harbors a couple of Catholic minorities in New York City, yet the ward additionally suits different
When driving past the modest copper bricked building topped with a bulky black roof, one might only see it as just a school for children; however, there is so much more to it than what meets the eye. The large black cross that clings to the front entrance wall suggests to its visitants the school’s religious affiliation which is further evidenced by the name “St. Louis” in slate black lettering on the wall parallel to it. St. Louis Catholic School was established in 1964 in Princeton, Illinois as a pre-school through eighth grade elementary school and is still today. It remains the only Catholic elementary school in Bureau Country, making it unique to the area. Although the class sizes tend to be small with regards to the quantity of students, the many experiences that the school provides including the encouragement of creativity, providing a friendly and comfortable classroom environment and the stress on the formation of a loving community live with the students for the majority of their lives.
According to the reading of Job, ancient Hebrews believed that God only punished those who have acted unjustly. In the year 2000 B.C. , the stories in the Bible were told and passed on orally through generations before finally being written down around 1000 years later in 1000 B.C. This time period was crucial because this was the time where ancient Hebrews started evolving and becoming a greater community in which only one God was present rather than multiple gods, as believed by the Mesopotamians and Egyptians. Having one God rather than many who specified in a particular area meant that this one God guides everything and everyone. There is no such thing as an unjust God, hence God is just and therefore only punishes those who are unjust.
On Sunday September 27, 2015, I attended St. Jerome Catholic Church. The address for this Catholic Church is 116 Denbigh Blvd, Newport News, VA 23608. The service started at 12pm that Sunday afternoon and Father Jong Bayta gave the reading as well as held the communion for the church. There were two other fathers there as well; Father Thomas Pasiden and Father Luke Sanchez. They didn’t say anything throughout the service but helped Father Jong when needed. I soon found out that they were in training to open up their own church soon.
The St. Anthony Catholic church is located in Camdenton, Missouri. The church is not very large, but there are still many people that attend this church every Sunday. The word catholic comes from a term of “all-embracing.” Catholicism is also are another form of Christianity. However, Catholic worship services are set up differently. The St. Anthony Catholic church, be that as it may, still has its own interesting beliefs about God.
In Exodus 21, a set of laws is laid out before the Hebrew people declaring what is punishable by death. For example, anyone who attacked their father and mother was to be put to death. They were set by God to instate a sense of civility amongst people and create a society that was free of heinous crimes. "Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,... (Exodus 21:24). This particular verse in the bible justifies retribution for crimes committed to you as long as they were committed purposefully. In other cases it was up to God to pass due judgement. Throughout the bible there are many examples of God's wrath and fear of being struck down for committing crimes that plagued societies and the general
From the biblical text, Exodus 12:29, in which all the firstborn children are struck down, is in support of Moore’s claim that the entirety of the writing of Exodus was a historical fiction writing.
Christianity and violence are always topics of discussion because many people have taken the terms and made it too justify their personal reasoning while in actually it might just mean to advertise love. In Genesis beacause Eve ate from the tree of the forbidden tree which caused God to made child birth a harmful pain, which further led to menstrual pain. God did not send us pain to kill us but to teach us a lesson of simply following the directions that we are told. The word violence can be defined as strength of emotion or an unpleasant or destructive natural force. However many forms of any violent will simply means harm because of the mentally block that we are ready have in our mind. In this paper I am going to discuss the teaching of Bible on violence, has the Bible been used to justify violence and how the Bible is not a violent religious text.
3. Sherwood, Yvonne. “Cutting up Life: Sacrifice as a Device for Clarifying – And Tormenting – Fundamental Distinctions between Human, Animal, and Divine.” In The Bible and Posthumanism. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2014. 247-297.
It would appear that there is undeniable likeness to the Koowon examination of Zipporah’s declaration about Moses being a bloody bridegroom (or bloody husband) and the redemptive work accomplished by the shedding of Christ’s blood for His bride – the church (2015, p.16). We may never know or fully comprehend the intent of the author’s brevity on this matter or grasp all the implications of this discourse. However, the most salient issue is, that for whatever the reasoning, God prevailed and His will was accomplished. Hence, although the Bible is fraught with curiosities on matters that confound humanity’s meager abilities to clutch the scope of the eternal God’s omnipotence, one must, if they ascribe to the teachings presented in Biblical dissertations, nonetheless concede to God’s wisdom and
In recent days, more and more people question about if the Bible is a reliable resource of stating history. Different scholars may have different understandings towards the characters, even if the researchers are telling the same event at the same timeline. In the article “ Genesis 1 and Ancient Egyptian Creation Myths”, Gordon H. Johnston focuses on the connection between Genesis 1 and the Egyptian creation myths since he thinks there exists the dispute between Genesis 1 and Babylonian creation because of two basic but vital problems “a matter of debate” and the origin of “God and the primordial waters” (Johnston 179). He uses the literary as the entry point to analyze the relationship between the Genesis 1 and Egyptian creation myths, which
As with the other readings, the fundamental differences in the beliefs and worldviews of Jews and Christians are made evident by the apocalypse narratives. Again, the need to make the story about one’s own group is apparent in the texts of the New Testament strategically anchoring themselves in those of the Hebrew Bible. This, in turn, presents an interesting perspective on how the first Christians came to be, as they were converted Jews.
The bible begins the story “Moses in Egypt” by introducing the upright, sons of God, who traveled to Egypt. These names include Jacob, Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Benjamin, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher. In contrast, the Quran begins the story by introducing Pharaoh. Pharaoh has a negative reputation for his wrongdoings and flaunts his pleasure in the hardship he has presented upon the people of the land. Simply within the introduction of the stories, positive and negative connotations are discharged. The bible begins with a simple introduction of good characters, where as, the Quran begins its tale with a dreadful protagonist. Following the introduction, the Bible continues by explaining that all newborn boys must be killed, while
William Butterfield had little interest in contributing to the development of a distinctly Australian identity. During the design and construction of St. Paul’s Cathedral, Melbourne was experiencing a transitional period whereby many were attempting to develop an authentic Australian architectural identity. The 1880s saw the “feeling about the place of foreign architecture drastically altered” (Hamann 1979, 393) and the earlier calls that Australia’s “imported styles simply be altered to accommodate climate” (Hamann 1979, 393) were beginning to be abandoned. Unfortunately, the societal reality of Melbourne at this time was that much of Australia’s population still consisted of displaced first generation foreigners and, as such, traditional
Furthermore, if you cannot have ethics without God, which one of God’s teachings should be following. Should the teachings in the old testament championing an “eye for an eye” be tossed aside in favour of the new testament teaching of us to “turn the other cheek”. If God’s will is good, then it is both morally right to exact revenge, as well as demonstrate forgiveness to an injustice. I argue that this argument challenges the premise that God is omniscient as in the old testament, God commands and permits one act, and in the new testament contradicts and supports an entirely different act. If we follow the DCT and assume that as God’s will is good then both commands are correct, then it is up to the individual to decide which moral action to take. If such freedom is possible in making moral decisions, then divine command may not always be needed to satisfy our moral duties.