preview

Residential Segregation

Good Essays

1. Do you think race-based residential segregation, especially black-white, will continue to be a fact of American society in the foreseeable future? Why or why not? What factors contribute to continued residential segregation? What factors may facilitate de-segregation? From my experience within my community, I sadly still see today the occurrence of race-based residential segregation in our society. There was one incident that I remember from my childhood, where an African American family was looking at a home across from my family and the older neighbors were in an uproar about their property value going down. As a child, I really did not understand what the big deal was or what difference it made to have that family move into the neighborhood. …show more content…

29). Donald Noel stated that there was three additional factors that contributed to development of ethnic stratification: ethnocentrism, competition for scarce societal resources, and an unequal distribution of power (Marger, 2012, p. 44). Ethnocentrism is the opinions of different intergroups and how they will judge each other based on their own culture. For an example that is used in the text book, white Anglo-Saxons in the United States favored people from southern and eastern Europeans (Italian and Polish) over African Americans, Mexican Americans, and American Indians (Marger, 2012, p. 44). Competition for scarce societal resources is when groups within the same area are striving for the same rare resources and it usually leads to conflict between the groups. With the Europeans who immigrated to the U.S., the brought a distinct set of skills which determined their jobs and how they furthered themselves. When Africans were force to come to the U.S., they were held back and were placed in submissive situations where they could not flourish (Marger, 2012, p. 45). The unequal distribution of power is the final part for the development of ethnic stratification and is basically when groups overpower others and there is no foundation for a …show more content…

In the early nineteenth century, the pietistic Protestants felt that they were obligated to reform society (Jensen, 2009, p. 46). During the 1920s and throughout the Great Depression, immigration was greatly discouraged by Americans and seemed to increase after the First World War and through the second. In the text book, it describes how Congress legislated quotas that limited the large-scale of European immigration (Marger, 2012, p. 123). Americans generally question how immigrants would fit within our society and how they will contribute economically, culturally, and socially. Today nativism and racism have the same concepts and go hand in hand according to Cameron D. Lippard, but also claims that they are two distinct occurrences. Lippard (2011) describes nativism today as an ideology that is based on separatist attitudes and keeping “natives” separated from foreigners (p.593). Racism, on the other hand, relies on socially constructed racial categories that distributes privileges and resources to within society (Lippard, 2011, p. 595). I believe that there could be a resurgence of nativism in the twenty-first century and in some ways are actually happen in today’s society. With the issue of illegal immigrants and Syrian refugees coming into the United States and Donald Trump’s claim

Get Access