Possibility Impaired: Article Analysis

Everyday tools like computers, telephones and other aids can all present barriers”(“About the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act”, 2005). Technology is rapidly growing, and is changing. Making the lives of people better and changing how people communicate, and function day-to-day . However, there is a minority of people who cannot access this technology, or utilize it due to disability. The AODA sets out to ensure that accommodation is met across the board, for disabled people to be able access and utilize services, access facilities, and be embraced as functioning members of

The researched proposal by Manasi Deshpande entitled “A Call to Improve Campus Accessibility for the Mobility Impaired,” is a reasonable argument, by this student, to improve campus accessibility at the University of Texas. I believe this student supports her argument very well by using interviews and campus observations. The proposal emphasizes the challenges students with mobility impairments encounter while attending classes on campus. Ms. Deshpande includes her personal experiences, as well as the experiences of fellow students as supporting evidence. Frankly, it was a bit shocking to learn this student changed her major due to accessibility issues. This fact alone should be a strong argument for change. The proposal details the benefits for improving campus accessibility not only for students, but also faculty. Moreover, Ms. Deshpande adds to her argument by including statistics regarding the

These changes can and will affect everyone on campus. A more accessible campus would mostly just affect those with disabilities. We also have the power of words which can make everyone more aware of this disability. Once someone is more aware of something that they do not understand, they understand how to handle being in a situation where they must deal with this. In conclusion, if everyone was more aware of quadriplegics, and they understood that we are no different, we would feel less alone. People wouldn’t be afraid to talk to us and they wouldn’t treat us different than everybody

The right of entry to education resources is more than uncomplicated admission to a college. The right to use means to provide students with the devices they will need to be victorious in higher learning. Students with a recognized disability ought to be no omission. In reality, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, “ensure that all qualified persons have equal access to education regardless of the presence of any disability.” Objective replacement, class waivers, and revision of classroom management, testing and course necessities are all illustrations of behavior to supply access for the learner with a disability. A break down to the creation of such practical adjustments can place schools in breach of federal and state statutes, ensuing expensive fines.

This article focuses on the many forms of technology in relation to special education. The article discusses the “high” and “low” forms of technology that is available for students with special needs to help “bypass” or “compensate” for their disabilities. The article goes on to survey the current status of assistive technology for the special education population. In the end, the article uncovers that the use of assistive technology for the special education population is promising though uncertain. Assistive technology has proven to be beneficial for students with learning disabilities, as it would empower them to work beyond their normal capabilities (Lewis, 1998).

Sanson (2005, p. 3) believes that when it comes to accommodating students with disabilities, scientists, practitioners, and politicians are necessary to the process as a whole and communication between these individuals is essentia.

The former US President Bill Clinton said, “New information and communications technologies can improve the quality of life for people with disabilities, but only if such technologies are designed from the beginning, so that everyone can use them.” Discussing disabilities in general will take longer than one day. I am going to talk about physical disabilities .As the Longman dictionary defines physical disability is a limitation of a person 's physical functioning, mobility, dexterity and stamina. The issue of disability is not just a matter that concerns disabled people. It has been the problem for ages in the American history and if it is not controlled it can cause big fight. When someone is disabled, it does not mean that he or she cannot be educated. According to the Washington Post, education is the breath of life, without it man cannot survive. Education is free in America, which means everyone can obtain an equal education. One would ask if colleges have gone too far to accommodate students with disabilities. Colleges have not gone far enough to support the disabled.

In today's world, one would assume that America is hitting all the marks, when in reality we are falling short in what may count the most. We are not meeting the basic needs of our largest minority group, mentally and physically disabled people. Lack of accessibility is a difficult hurdle for both physically and cognitively disabled people. Lawmakers have a duty to everyone in America, not just the able, and encouraging accessibility in the public is the first step in the right direction.

Accessibility – A pupil in a wheelchair needs to have as much access to classroom facilities as others. Furniture and resources may need to be moved to allow for this.

Things such as parking spaces, wide enough doorways and just natural traveling within the facilities are deterrents to these people for seeking care. Including the lack of height-adjustable examination tables, weight scales accessible for those with mobility or activity limitations, lack of broad doorways for wheelchairs, and sign language interpreters for the deaf (Schwartz,2012). The failure to enter a building is not the main reason individuals can’t be accommodated. Inaccessible equipment is a far more common barrier (Lagu, Lezzoni, & Lindenauer, 2014).

Mayo Moran’s Independent Review of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act received widespread positive critique from individuals across the country that highly valued her in-depth insight into this topic of necessity. Although Moran’s Review reinforces the AODA, her own recommendations and critiques are what essentially bring the topic of accessibility into focus. Through her review, it becomes clear that a cultural shift is necessary within Ontario that can guarantee “full accessibility”. By exploring my personal perspective of Moran’s report, along with some key features of the AODA, this review aims to shed light upon the necessities required to push forward the positive movement of accessibility functions within Ontario.

This was an eye-opener for us to advocate for public transportation especially the bus to be modified to accommodate persons with physical disability using a wheelchair. A lift or a ramp could be provided for easy boarding of the bus. Additional space

The first thing that stood out in the article, Where We Are Going, is the approach King takes to reflect the United States poverty dilemma. By referring to all races as a whole, instead of pieces of a problem, anyone who reads this is able to relate. Growing up, I myself was part of the lower middle class; I never understood why I never had as much as the other kids did. This caused having a mindset I could not follow in my family’s path because that is what I grew to blame. However, it has not been easy. A constant cycle of school, work, and life demands; I know by doing one small thing wrong could cause all I’ve worked hard for to slip through my fingers. I would not know where to go from there, so I believe those

First, an article from 1995 proves how much technology has changed when it comes to accessibility. In his Nation article “Virtual Students, Digital Classroom,” Neil Postman points out, “It would be quite astonishing if computer technology equalized all learning opportunities, irrespective of economic differences.” (381). Modern technology is a part of every classroom unlike it was back years ago. Equipment has become accessible to everyone attending classes, not just the wealthy. Fat pencils have been replaced

Many of the limitations to our assessment can be attributed to our own circumstances as individuals without impairments, as we cannot accurately represent the needs or personal requirements that every unique individual. Reviewing the physical measurements of doorways, benches and walkways was an eye-opening experience, allowing us to comprehend the environmental barriers that individuals with impairments are forced to maneuver around in order to participate in physical activity and exercise. Our understanding of what was accessible was altered through this project, and we have found a greater appreciation for facilities that endeavor to fulfill the accessibility needs of their clients. It was interesting to note that many of the questions in the AIMFREE questionnaire are subjective to the individuals conducting the assessment. The Jamie Platz YMCA did provide many of the facilitators recommended; for example there is a new wheelchair accessible ergometer machine in the fitness centre, and attempts to resolve any issues or requests their members may have. Chin explained to us that the facility has made structural changes in the past to meet the needs of clients; however these renovations are not always fiscally possible. A similar study to our own documented the barriers and added costs that facilities encounter when trying to improve their accessibility