Policy Proposal: Restriction to Freedom of Speech Clause

Freedom of speech is defined by the first amendment as “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of

The Amendment I of the Bill of Rights is often called “the freedom of speech.”

The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion. This is a part that is often taken away from individuals. A frightening but clear example of this was the Holocaust. Million of Jews were forced to hide their religion and to be ashamed because of one man that though it wasn't the right way to live. The U.S. Constitutions makes it so that this will never occur in The United States. Another example that shows breaching and use of two different sections of the constitution is the KKK. This organization commits crimes and puts down certain people just because of their religion. These people are making it so that some would not want to show their heritage and what they believe because they are scared of ridicule. The KKK although violent and seemingly evil actually uses The First Amendment every time they meet. Some hate the KKK but it is their right to organize and say what they feel. No one can stop them from saying what they think of a certain religion. Some feel that there should be limitation on freedom of speech but then would our country truly be free? Often, children need to have the material they watch censored, because they themselves cannot distinguish how raw the material they are watching is. Youth should be protected, as well as people of all other ages from that kind of raw material. An interesting quote on censorship reads, "Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence

A very popular constitutional issue in America is the First Amendment. The First Amendment is meant to protect, but in today’s society it is being questioned that the argument is being overly used. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference (Esmaili). Freedom of religion created the separation of church and state. It prohibits the government from interfering with a person's practice of their religion. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. The right of freedom of expression gives the right to assemble and gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. It was adopted into the Bill of Rights in 1791. The Court later interpreted the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. Putting this is layman’s term, you can pretty much say what you want without being penalized.

Being expression one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy.

General limitations on free speech are libel, slander, obscenity, child pornography, incitement, offensive words, fighting words, classified information, copyright violation, sedition, and various other limitations. The offense principle is used to prohibit forms of expression that some consider offensive to society, groups, or individuals. For example, free speech is limited in many jurisdictions to broad varying standards by legal systems, religious offense, and incitement to ethnic or racial hatred laws. Legal systems and society have limits on the free speech, especially when it clashes with other values or rights. Limitations of speech may abide by the "harm principle" or the "offense principle", for example in the case of child pornography or racial

Topic: Do you believe that free speech as proscribed under the first amendment of the constitution should be limited?

“The First Amendment in Five Minutes - Video.” Big Think, 12 Aug. 2010, bigthink.com/videos/the-first-amendment-in-five-minutes) the true definition of the first amendment is as such, “The first amendment contains many rights. Which include freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech.” Since the integration of this Amendment there have been many changes. New circumstances involving freedom of speech are constantly being reevaluated by the courts. A circumstance involving Floyd Abrams, one of the many advocates who appeared to the supreme court defending this constitutional

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly, the right to make a

The first amendment states that no law should be made when it comes to religion, or free exercise. Although, some people take granted of freedom of speech. There should be a limit imposed when it comes to free speech. Without limits, the world would be a chaos. Also, freedom and speech could easily turn into hate speech at anytime.

Freedom of expression has always been a heated and heavily debated topic throughout our society, more so in recent times due to the increasing amount of freedoms that we gain. However, it is only natural that free speech be something of extreme amounts of conflict since this right is expressed in the very first amendment of the Constitution. But, how loosely should such an important document within our history be interpreted? This has been a question for years, and it is obvious that this particular amendment presents itself through our day-to-day activities. The real issue with freedom of speech is that, even though it is presented to us, there are obviously people who would abuse it to invoke emotional distress, or even to invoke acts of

Under the First Amendment many types of speech receive the most stringent levels of protection while others receive little to no protection at all. Political or religious speech are two of the biggest and most important areas of speech that receive the most protection and seem to be at the core of the First Amendment rights. These two types of speech receive a

The First Amendment states Congress will have no right to prohibit or create laws against free speech, press, or religion. This documents in written word that all forms of speech and press are legal in the United States. Therefore,

In fact, Americans have a limited form of free speech. Several types of speech are not protected including fighting words, commercial speech, libel and slander, and obscenity. The Supreme Court has three tests for determining what is obscene: "(1) whether the average person, applying local community standards, would find that a work, taken as a whole, appeals to a prurient interest; (2) whether the work depicts in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined as 'obscene' in law; and (3) whether the work,

Free speech should not be restricted.  The first amendment gives the right for anyone to say whatever he or she wants, whenever they want and guarantees us the privilege to speak our minds without limitations.   Our right to free speech is one thing that sets the United States apart from any other country.  Since September 11, 2001 all