Plaintiff V. Court Case Summary

Section 1 of Chapter 9(c) stated that 1) one parent, or 2) an agency, can file a complaint for child support, but failed to indicate proof of paternity of the child, neither through blood nor DNA tests to assure 100% that the alleged or accused parent was in deed the child’s biological parent.

A court awards a judgment to Loan Collection Agency, who is the creditor, against Margret, who is the debtor. After the judgment, the creditor requests a court order to seize Margret’s property to ensure that the judgment will be collectible. This is

I am asking The COURT to order my former husband, James Michael Newman, known herein as Mike, to comply with "Article III 3.1g"and "Statement of Liabilities,Other Short Term Debt "and pay my dental fees. Easily affording the full cost ($32,085.00), Mike insists he pay my dentists directly, but repeatedly withholds the funds. I am asking The COURT to stop deliberate abuse and order one final and direct payment to me.

THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard before the Court upon the Wife’s Complaint for Divorce, and the Husband’s Counter Complaint for Divorce, and the Court having scheduled a Final Hearing for June 17, 2012, and the parties and their respective counsel having appeared before the Court on said date, and the parties having established residency during the Final Hearing,

WHEREFORE, the Defendant prays that the Court will set this matter down for a hearing, and upon hearing order that:

“Concise and clear pleadings are vital to the administration of justice. No party should be called upon to answer or defend the redundant, jumbled and cryptic pleadings filed by plaintiff’s counsel, and no court should be forced to expend so much time and energy attempting to decipher them.” Id. at 949.

Moreover, the claimant believes that he has presented all the necessary evidence that could have supported his claim. For instance, the defendant have intentionally interfered the claimant’s contractual agreement with the hospital by using improper means and finally resulted his termination. On other hand, the defendant prevented chances that could have allowed the claimant to return his work in later days by enticing the hospital to introduce a rule that disallows to perform any service from the hospital. Due to that, the plaintiff demanded for the appeal court to grant him the summary of judgement and reverse the circuit court decision. On the other hand, the defendant beliefs that the circuit court reach a fair decision and demands the appeal court to affirm the decision that has already been

The Plaintiff initiated this suit on a § 1983 complaint form provided by the Clerk of Court. Section 1983 provides, in pertinent part:

In this instant appeal, Mr. Shoemaker asserts that the circuit court erred by imposing an improper purge provision after finding him to be in contempt, and that the circuit court erred in finding that Mr. Shoemaker would be liable for alimony payments in accordance with the parties’ original separation agreement. We shall address both of these arguments in turn.

Per the order received, the court suspended this case effective 1/11/17, with the NCP order to pay $350.00 per month on arrearage owed as of the suspension date.Fiscal reviewed case accounts; case overcharged by six months at the rate of $449.00 per month. . Therefore, the WC account balance was adjusted to $0.00 and the WA account balance was adjusted to $17,215.13. Caseworker A. Brant submitted the fiscal request.

h. Judgment: plaintiff receives a judgment which gives him/her the right to obtain the money from the defendant

An auto dealer filed an erroneous criminal complaint against the taxpayer, Marlene. As a result she was falsely imprisoned for approximately 8 hours. Although the criminal charges against Marlene were expunged, and she did not suffer any physical injury, she endured mental distress during the ordeal that required the intervention of a psychologist. Marlene paid $5,000.00 for the counseling services rendered by the psychologist.

Upon receipt, we will forward the checks to opposing counsel. We have not received drafting instructions for Steven Staten. He has child support lien that opposing counsel alleges is lifted. Opposing counsel stated he will send the drafting instructions

If the court shall determine that a part of the award is invalid on some ground or grounds designated in this section as a ground of invalidity, but shall determine that a part of the award is valid, the court shall set aside the entire award: Provided, however, That, if the parties shall agree thereto, and if such valid and invalid parts are separable, the court shall set aside the invalid part, and order judgment to stand as to the valid part. At the expiration of 10 days from the decision of the district court upon the petition filed, as aforesaid, final judgment shall be entered in accordance with said decision, unless during said ten days either party shall appeal therefrom to the court of appeals. In such case only such portion of the record shall be transmitted to the appellate court as does necessary to the proper

Per order received from the court the support obligation amount increased in this case to $647.45 per month effective on 7/17/17. Fiscal modified the SOA amount in the CC account to begin charging $645.45 per month effective 7/17/17. In addition, fiscal modified the amount on the CA account to $19.55 per month. Therefore, after modifying the account SOA charges, fiscal adjusted the balance on account to $228.65 balance.