Peer Review

Peer-Review Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The essay I was assigned is “How To Write With Style” by Kurt Vonnegut. After reading the essay, I found that a theme that would best summarize it is “effective communication. Kurt Vonnegut writes in his essay about how one should write in order to attract the reader and effectively communicate your thoughts. His advice to writing as he calls it “How To Write With Style” provides an insight to some elements that allows the writer to effectively communicate his thoughts and be true to him or herself. Keeping it simple, Have the guts to cut, Sound like yourself, Say what you mean to say, Pity the readers are his advice to writers to become effective writers. After reading the essay, I looked at several stories and poems that shared a similar

Overall, the essay seemed to lack flow as a result of a noticeable absence of transition words. The essay had bad syntax. Each paragraph seemed to be scenario after scenario and each sentence seemed to be idea after idea. For example, in the first paragraph, the list consisted of multiple sentences, instead of just one sentence with commas. “But they are few: Being mistaken for a wheat field by a cloud of locusts. Being buried alive”...“Interviews from film festivals.”, this seemed like an awful way to list ideas. In addition, the fourth paragraph of the essay was made up of only 2 sentences, one

Protection provided when a nurse invokes the safe harbor include that the nurse who fills the forms in the good will should not be suspended, terminated disciplined or even discriminated against. Also, the nurse is protected for 48 hours after being advised of the PRC determination. In addition, there is safe harbor rule that has been established to prevent retaliation of nurses by their managers and shield the license of the nurse from actions by the Texas board of nurses when RN reports practices that can detrimentally affect the manner in which the nurse carries out the duties.

A peer review is a process of subjecting research methods and findings to the study of others who are experts in the same field. The purpose is designed to prevent dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views. It relies on colleagues that review one another’s work and make an informed decision about whether it is legitimate, and adds to the large dialogue or findings in the field.

Personally, from the class of English 1101, I have learned on how to use the writing processes effectively, where the first step is to have a pre-write, which focuses on brainstorming ideas form either the group or from individuals’ brain for the required topic. The second phase of the process is the thesis statement, which is the primary idea of the entire essay. I discovered that the thesis statement should be persuasive and truthful. The third step is on developing drafts, where it showed me on how to focus on content, organization, and style. Again, I noted that I must ask myself who is my audience, and what do they want or need to hear.

Helpful Tip: Review the reading strategies on pages 70-73 in the textbook to aid in reading peer-reviewed journal articles.

Your paper should be organized around a thesis statement that clarifies what you will attempt to accomplish in your paper, and how you will proceed. Additionally, you must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.

My strengths in this essay, I believe, are in not just analyzing the information that Solnit provides, but in also analyzing the effect that this information has on the readers. My final body paragraph details both the logical and the emotional responses that Solnit brings up in her audience. Additionally, I feel that I was successful in tying all of the analysis that I supply back to Solnit’s purpose in writing the essay. It is easy to look at the context and the substance of an essay, but to relate it all back to the author’s goal in writing it is what shows that you have a fuller understanding of the work.

1. Summary of the paper (max. 250 words). 25% of credit. In this section, you need to briefly

Moreover, I found in-class peer review very helpful during the revision process. For example, I was very unclear on my AP solution part, but after one on one in class peer review, I received many helpful comments from my peers on how I can develop my points. Below is a picture of my in-class peer review comment and how I revised. This is a picture of my AP draft 2. In this draft, I was still struggling on how to elaborate more on my solution and I was not sure about if my claim was strong enough. However, after having a face to face conversation with my peer, I was able to discuss any concerns I had.

Peer review is the assessment of nursing services, the quality of patient care provided by nurses, the benefits of a complaint concerning a nurse or a nursing care, and a purpose regarding a complaint. The nursing review committee is a process in which fact finding, analysis and study of events by nurses in a climate of mutual problem solving focused on obtaining all relevant information about an event. Section 303.0015(c) requires that nursing peer review committee that conducts a peer review involves professional nursing must have two thirds of its members as RN and may have only RN’s as voting members.

University studies often require long hours of researching and sourcing articles for information and can be quite difficult. Students may try to time save to make progress go quicker by using Wikipedia however it should never be used or accepted as a referencing source for essay writing The inaccuracy of its content due to the lack of expert peer reviewing process makes it a liability for students to use for referencing though it does have a future potential for becoming a valuable source.

The author discuss the main point of the article around the well being of the children with the same gender parents (LGBT), comparing to the children with straight sexual orientation. In the light of this main point, the author reviewed the literature of the previous researches which studded one or more of the relevant factors for the children who have same gender parents.

IN YOUR OWN WORDS, summarize the Discussion section. (What did the authors find and what was their explanation for their findings? If this was a qualitative study, what were the themes that the authors found? What was interesting and why? What were the limitations of the study? What were some future directions or applications that the authors identified?) 14 points