Mark Twain's Jurassic Park

Rachel Carson’s Man and the Stream of time possesses enlightening perspectives of nature that have been marinating in her mind for ten years. Her writing reflects upon the effects that man has on nature and the role he plays in the ever changing environment. Her sole observation is that it is man’s nature to want to conquer the world, but nature is not one to be conquered. The writer affirms that nature is an entity that must be dignified, Like English poet Francis Thompson said, “Thou canst not stir a flower without troubling of a star.” Most environmentalist would agree that nature is not stationary, we cut the trees now today, its not just the trees that disappear ten years from now. As humanity advances, we create a multitude of

The statement that can best be made about the purpose of The Lowest Animal by Mark Twain is that he believes that mankind is immoral, vulgar, wasteful, vengeful, discriminatory; cruel, greed, and obscene. This is because he has a moral sense and conscience despite this, doesn’t make our decisions right and properly. However, contrast with Mark Twain’s thesis; I think human beings are not that all bad and not the lowest animal, but perhaps not the highest animal either.

“The Lowest Animal” is Mark Twain’s way of criticizing Darwinism, saying humans did not adapt and become better versions of other animals, the animals are the better versions of us. Twain’s words have rotated my perspective 360 degrees, because he is absolutely right, I just never thought about things as deep as he does until I read “The Lowest Animal”. Human beings are cavalier, ungrateful, and narcissistic beings only thinking for themselves. If they are fortunate to have money, they waste it on things they won’t need or will never use, instead of using it to help others in need.

In his essay, “The Lowest Animal”, Mark Twain attempts to prove a pessimistic opinion of his. He compares humans to animals, and explains how contrary to widespread belief, humans are a lower animal to other species. While he makes some valid points about greed, selfishness, and violence, he misses the overall picture of human nature. I firmly believe that the human race is made of not only civilized, but caring human beings. If humans were as abominable as Twain attempts to make us out to be, we would not have countries, communities, or any other caring and loving, individual connections. We would also have countless amounts of prisons, prisoners, high mortality rates due to violence, and lower life-spans. Twain writes from a subjective point of view, allowing his opinions of

Throughout “Catalog of Unabashed Gratitude” by Ross Gay, Gay shows how nature controls emotional responses, forces and other higher or more powerful things. Furthermore, nature brings about unnatural aspects causing greater control of forces in nature, and outside of the natural realm. Many cycles revolve around nature, producing a circle, or cycle, of life that changes depending on different things. Even more, nature can interact with man-made things in ways that disrupt it. Gay portrays nature as a commanding force, something that’s located everywhere. Also, it shows how the nature forces have consequential reactions, resulting in everything being controlled by nature. Ultimately, this shows how Gay portrays nature as a controlling

Human perception is a subject so diverse and impossible to delineate that we cannot even hope to understand it fully. It is perhaps due to this incompleteness in our grasp of the subject that literary and scholarly works aiming to interpret it abound. Among the list of venturing authors who sought to address this elusive subject is Mark Twain, whose excerpt from Life on the Mississippi presents a unique idea about experiential learning. More specifically, Twain contends that intimate familiarity can diminish appreciation through use of an extended metaphor, elaborate description, and analogy.

In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, man tries to tamper with nature. This is an enormous mistake, because his experiences prove that man should respect the omnipotent power of nature so man can be happy. Man should respect nature because if man goes beyond his limits, then nature lets man creates all types of consequences for himself which proves Shelley’s point to respect nature’s powers.When people look at nature, they are automatically healed just by its looks. This is a much more powerful force than anything man is capable of doing, thus nature is all powerful. Nature is constant, unlike man who is constantly changing, which shows that nature is always in control.

Throughout “Catalog of Unabashed Gratitude” by Ross Gay, Gay shows how nature controls emotional responses, forces and other higher or more powerful things. Furthermore, nature brings about unnatural aspects causing greater control of forces in nature, and outside of the natural realm. Many cycles revolve around nature producing a circle, or cycle, of life that changes depending on different things. Even more, nature can interact with man-made things in ways that disrupt it. Gay portrays nature as a commanding force, something that’s located everywhere. Also, it shows how the nature forces have consequential reactions, resulting in everything being controlled by nature. Ultimately, this shows how Gay portrays nature as a controlling

    "The world was made for man to conquer and rule, and under human rule it was meant to become a paradise" (Ishmael 82). Much like this evolutionary mythological theory, the movie Jurassic Park tells a tale of man's attempt to rule over nature. Through the movie's description and imagery, the viewer perceives the arrogance of humans to control nature, and the consequences and failures of this flawed intention. John Hammond, park creator, uses state of the art technology and ideas to recover dinosaur DNA, fill in missing gene caps, and breed the previously extinct animals to exploit his accomplishment. This process is set into motion without regard to the ethics behind the research, and

Although man can easily report their findings, it is not possible for humans to control nature without

Overall I found Freakonomics interesting and very cool because some of the topics they touched on and how they linked them back together. I also liked the depth the authors went into like the baby names breaking down all the life choices a child could make just because his or her name is a little different then the kid sitting next to them in class. The authors also covered bunch of different scenarios throughout the book and the different incentives that might have lead them to breaking a law of or working harder in school. When I think of the book as a whole I feel like I just had a lesson at school but one with more interesting topics and ideas on how to fix the crazy problem or topic. The authors also make you feel more involved putting

The idea that even nature is being controlled shows that the governments are abusing their power and are being so controlling that even nature cannot overcome the pure strength and brutality that their

In the movie “Avatar” there are a lot of references about nature and how some human beings are willing to protect it but also destroy it. Avatar takes location in another planet close to earth where wildlife is rich, the “sky people” as interpreted by the na’vi is an organization of men and women that are willing to destroy everything on it's path just to obtain a certain rock. And sometimes we destroy our planet like them not big things but by everyday use, like pollution, accumulation of garbage, and forest destruction Ecosystems are kept alive by the flow of energy that is obtained by cycling energy from external sources. Like in pandora every living thing like animal, trees, plants, and moving organisms all have a “link” that connects them to the planet. We call it “just” a forest but to them is more than that, is a place to live, learn, and to enjoy.

     As I mentioned before our environment has a great effect on our nature. For example a theory claimed that, the first humans

Nature is merely our instrument of conquering one another. By manipulating what already exists, we create everything from nuclear warheads to high speed internet. The continuous competition between men feeds off of our technological advancement—none of which would be possible without the resources Nature provides for us. And rather than being grateful for the unequivicable power so generously offered us by our environment, we instead mock its existence. We distract from the cunningness and cruelty of our efforts toward mankind by relabeling our target ‘Nature’ rather than ‘each other’. By convincing ourselves we are somehow beginning to have Nature within our control and understanding, we forget that Nature is really only the means, not the end of our conquest. We will not be satisfied until we have defeated ourselves. As Lewis puts it, “Human nature will be the last part of Nature to surrender to Man. The battle will then be won… But who, precisely, will have won it?” (The Abolition of Man, 421)