Literary Explication Of Shakespeare's Sonnet 130

William Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 116” and Edna St. Vincent Millay’s “Love Is Not All” both attempt to define love, by telling what love is and what it is not. Shakespeare’s sonnet praises love and speaks of love in its most ideal form, while Millay’s poem begins by giving the impression that the speaker feels that love is not all, but during the unfolding of the poem we find the ironic truth that love is all. Shakespeare, on the other hand, depicts love as perfect and necessary from the beginning to the end of his poem. Although these two authors have taken two completely different approaches, both have worked to show the importance of love and to define it. However, Shakespeare is most confident of his definition of love, while Millay seems

“Sonnet 116” written by William Shakespeare is focusing on the strength and true power of love. Love is a feeling that sustainable to alterations, that take place at certain points in life, and love is even stronger than a breakup because separation cannot eliminate feelings. The writer makes use of metaphors expressing love as a feeling of mind not just heart as young readers may see it. To Shakespeare love is an immortal felling that is similar to a mark on a person’s life.

Sonnets are known for having a rigid format and being the hoard of poets’ flowery love confessions and tormenting heartache. While most poets generally stick to that cliche topic of love and the traditional English or Petrarchan structures, sonnets are not defined by these common features. Both Shakespeare’s “My mistress’ eyes are…” and Collins’s “Sonnet” satirically poke at typical sonnets, however, Shakespeare follows the standard English sonnet style while parodying the classic subject of love to show how ridiculous and idealistic love sonnets can be. On the other hand, Collins breaks free from those stern sonnet rules to joke about the strictness of sonnet structures while defining typical sonnet rules.

If I was the recipient of the two sonnets, I would feel both honored and loved, while simultaneously offended and hurt. Shakespeare spends the majority of both sonnets borderline bullying his subjects. Offering only a slight rebuttal in the closing couplets of both sonnets. In Sonnet 130, Shakespeare details the mundaneness of his love, speaking of how she is not special, and he recognizes that there are many things better than her. These descriptions are countered by the final couplet of the sonnet, in which Shakespeare says how rare his love for her is, and how he unfairly compared her, thus changing the entire tone of the sonnet within the last couplet. Shakespeare employs this same tactic in Sonnet 138. In this sonnet, Shakespeare details

Known as the leader in classical poetry and drama, English writer William Shakespeare, captures the passion and emotions that the romance and depths of the human heart experiences in life. This is especially shown in his vast collection of sonnets which exemplified the “carpe diem” ideology of the period, and the love that one can have for another. Two of the most famous of Shakespeare’s works, Sonnet 55 [Not Marble, nor the gilded monuments] and sonnet 116 [Let me not to the marriage of true minds], are no exception to this theme in poetry. Both of these sonnets exemplify the love that the narrator has for a mistress in his life, and how he defines his love for them. Throughout both poems, Shakespeare conveys his purpose through the

The Sonnet 138 is a poem by William Shakespeare. In the poem, Shakespeare uses imagery and diction to describe the speakers mistress to the reader. With the utilization of such techniques, Shakespeare is able to incorporate the speakers personal qualities as rude, honest, and genuine.

Sonnet 130 is a famous poem written by Shakespeare. Shakespeare is a famous writer and wrote a lot of sonnets and poems. Sonnet 130 is a good poem to analyze with the TP-CASTT.

Through his countless sonnets and plays, William Shakespeare rarely, if ever, runs with a preconceived notion of something. His work is unique, calling upon a vast array of subjects while inventing newfound ways of approaching them. One topic in which Shakespeare is all too familiar with is love. His sonnets especially deal with this subject, with sonnet 130 standing out as probably the largest betrayal of our normal expectations of love as any. Within 14 lines, Shakespeare manages to describe his love in a less than positive fashion for most of the poem, quite contrary to the dreamy-eyed poems about love to which many are familiar. Through the use of figurative language, Shakespeare manages to create his own social expectation for love while

The title of the poem “My mistress eyes are nothing like the sun” suggests that the speaker is not in love with his ‘mistress’. However, this is not the case. Shakespeare uses figurative language by using criticizing hyperboles to mock the traditional love sonnet. Thus, showing not only that the ideal woman is not always a ‘goddess’, but mocking the way others write about love. Shakespeare proves that love can be written about and accomplished without the artificial and exuberant. The speaker’s tone is ironic, sarcastic, and comical turning the traditional conceit around using satire. The traditional iambic pentameter rhyming scheme of the sonnet makes the diction fall into place as relaxed, truthful, and with elegance in the easy flowing verse. In turn, making this sonnet one of parody and real love.

Often times when a person is in love with someone, they’ll go to extraordinary lengths for them and even warp reality to make them happy. One example of this is when one describes the looks of their love and what in particular they like about them; the description might get blown out of proportion. In our society, the more that is said and even exaggerated the sweeter sounding it seems, and often times there is a focus on one’s physical attributes. In most works of love, this is the technique that is often used, the use of exaggeration in order to create a more pleasurable reality. In Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 130”, the speaker has his own way of describing his “mistress” and goes against what is expected. As Helen Vendler suggests in her book Poems, Poets, Poetry: An Introduction and Anthology, “Sonnet 130” is a “mocking reply” to similarly structured poems (Vendler 100). Therefore, the poem goes against other love poems by describing the speaker’s love in an almost degrading way instead of an exaggerated glorification of their features. However, if the poem seems to bring down the person the speaker is in love with, can it still be considered a love poem? Although the poem seems to do so, the way it is written and what it focuses on makes “Sonnet 130” still a love poem while also going against other love poems.

The heresy of the paraphrase is the idea that minotaur labyrinth king minos myth story don’t read this part the author’s exact words create a sort of combination of sound, rhythm, style, connotations, and denotations that can only be presented in the exact way the author presents it or it will lose its intended meaning and flow. All this is especially applicable to Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130, since it is written in iambic pentameter, and the rhythm and rhyme of it would be lost in any paraphrase. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Poetry is oftentimes a fascinating bit of literature. In a short amount of time, one is expected to have a topic and cut to the chase of things. This poem is a sonnet by none other than the legendary Shakespeare. Sonnet 150 has all the makings of a sonnet with the standardized form that makes it unidentifiably Shakespeare. The sonnet follows the rhyme scheme of abab cdcd efef gg which shows three quatrains and one couplet. Sonnet 150 is a one of the later poems that changes significantly from Shakespeare’s earlier works about love and crooning about how magical these feelings are. When looking at these later poems, we see Shakespeare acknowledging that love has its faults. These feelings are no longer the perfect centerpiece that can easily blind those in youth. Now that some age has passed, we the reader are in for a more grounded oftentimes colder treat that mirrors reality far more accurately than those of a love struck puppy. This sonnet is actually about beauty, how that beauty is handled, and ends with a truth about two different beings can come to terms with one another with all the flaws that they are riddled with.

Shakespeare's Sonnet 116, denying Time's harvest of love, contains 46 iambic, 15 spondaic, 6 pyrrhic, and 3 trochaic feet. Like the varying magnitudes of stars that distinguish the sky's constellations, infused with myths describing all degrees and types of love, the spondaic, trochaic, and pyrrhic substitutions create a pattern of meaning that can be inferred by the discerning eye and mind. Shakespeare emphasizes his denial of the effects of Time on love by accenting "not" in lines 1, 2, 9, and 11, and "no" in lines 5 and 14. The forceful spondees at the beginning and the regular iambic feet at the end of each quatrain progressively build the poet's passionate rejection of love's transience.

William Shakespeare’s ‘Sonnet 130’ and John Milton’s ‘Methought I saw my Late Espouséd Saint’ are both sonnets that adapt the Petrarchan tradition of the donna angelica. The poems both use the traditional sonnet structure, use imagery to describe a specific kind of beauty and were both written in the Early modern period when the Petrarchan tradition was popular. In spite of this, both ‘Sonnet 130’ and ‘Methought I Saw My Late Espouséd Saint’ avert from the Petrarchan tradition of donna angelica with a more women-friendly approach. ….

In the 21st century, literature is imperative to societal development; and, as such, particular styles of writing appeal to diverse groups of people. Although traditional poetry is debatably obsolete within contemporary backgrounds, current writers and music artists still employ such methods. William Shakespeare, for instance, expertly composed a collection of 154 sonnets; their construction, themes and emotions still effectively pave direction for future literature. Constructed to communicate contrasting ideals of love, the first 126 texts are based upon stereotypical romantic embellishment, while the remaining 28 focus solely on the feeling of an emotional connection, rather than that of the physical. Sonnet 130, in particular, is clearly a parody of the conventional love story, in which Shakespeare creatively pays a pragmatic tribute to the ‘dark lady’. While implying that his love for her is unconditional despite describing her appearance rather viciously, the authentic subtext of Sonnet 130 heavily relies on language rather than generic poetic techniques, and positions readers differently based upon their status within society.