Lewis And Clark Dbq Analysis

Lewis and Clark were not respectful to the Native Americans they encountered on their journey. They killed a Native American unnecessarily, stole horses, and made unreasonable demands and threats.

The Lewis and Clark expedition was a truth that was to become the crowning accomplishment in the lifetime of the brilliant thinker, inventor, and founding father, Thomas Jefferson . It has become a profounding turning point throughout America’s history. Investigating the recently obtained Louisiana Territory, which nearly doubled the size of the country, arranged Jefferson the opportunity to widen the boundaries of the United States to include both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The threat of the unknown lay ahead for Lewis and Clark’s team. The explorers had no idea what they would e be confronted with on their journey, but still they advanced into the unknown area that could officially be called part of America. Thanks to the addition of Lewis, Clark, their essential guide Sacajawea, and the many men that traveled with them America was able to expose land as well as providing important information about the topography, the biological studies, the ecology, and the studies of the American Indian as they discovered the mysteries of the Louisiana Purchase. Although it was a treacherous and costly journey, the Lewis and Clark expedition was the most important exploration in American history.

The American travelers Lewis, and Clark embarked on a journey, discovering new lands and space bought from the French. Along the way they encountered numerous tribes, and numerous Natives who have aided them in many ways, but new evidence states that the legendary cartographers were in fact very impolite people. Many people debate about it, but were Lewis and Clark respectful to the Natives they met on their journey? They weren’t in fact respectful at all. They left a medal on a dead Native to sprout fear between the people, and rid the Natives of their land to poor soil, as well as used their own belief and religion against them.

Lewis and Clark were not respectful to the American Indians who inhabited Louisiana. To illustrate, in document B it expresses that an Indian had taken a gun and ran off with it. Then J. Fields saw the Indian running with the gun and called for his brother R. Fields. R.Field stabbed the Indian to the heart with his knife (Document B: Diary Entry of Meriwether Lewis). This piece of evidence establish that they are not respecting the American Indians because the brothers had killed an Indian for just taking a gun. The Indian was probably curious about the technology that they had and were misunderstood.

Nelson. Lewis and Clark and the Indian Country: the Native American Perspective. Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press, 2008.

In the 17th and 18th century, each colony approached the idea of unity; however, they each had different proposals. Due to the colonies being separated from Great Britain, they developed different political conceptions from each other. However, when it came to the point that the colonies believed they should unite, each colony wrote a document stating their ideal, united government. Thus, some documents included God as a factor, proposing ideas that would be what God desires. Meanwhile, other documents provided militaristic notions, while others claimed that they should keep their connection with Britain. Comparing the documents from each other, it is perspicuously shown that there is a distinction between their intentions for a united government.

Not unlike George Washington and the Founding Fathers, who were also handpicked by God, now-President Andrew Jackson selected, tailored, and targeted by Deity as the man who must save the American union to fulfill the Divine Will of a set-apart, free nation. But at first the Indian War took many twists and turns. Prior to the War of 1812 as far back as August 31st, 1803 Thomas Jefferson, now President, sent Lewis and Clark Westward to explore the land beyond the Mississippi River. In preparation, this voyage proceeded from Pittsburgh PA to Louisville KY to St. Louis, MO. At the same time, President Jefferson sent James Monroe to Paris to meet with Napoleon to purchase the French territory for 80,000 francs. This vast landscape, later known as the Louisiana Purchase, geo/politically doubled the size of the American territory. Enroute, the Indians encountered by Lewis and Clark played a mixed role, some, the Sioux and Blackfoot, were unfriendly, some, the Shoshone, were helpful. The Indian teenage wife of one of the explorers, a Shoshone squaw, played a key role in the success of this mission. She acted as a translator. On November 7th 1805, after a death-defying journey of a year and a half and over 4000 miles, the Lewis and Clark expedition reached the Pacific Ocean and opened up all kinds of economic and political possibilities for the soon-to-be manifest destiny of a bulging

If one thing is to be respected and understood about the American Indians, it would be that their history and culture goes much further back than contemporary American history. Consequently, the relationship developed between American Indians and the United States is as unique as it is complicated. This unique relationship started because the American Indians were the first faces seen by fresh colonials from Europe. Despite this fact, the American Indians have faced cultural appropriation on a level that cannot be compared to any other ethnic group or minority. Any American who has been through kindergarten can associate Indians and Pilgrims with Thanksgiving, but how many of those Americans can tell about the Battle of Little Bighorn or the Alcatraz Proclamation? The unique relationship between the United States and American Indians has grown over time to allow for the level of appropriation that can be observed today. It is this unique relationship that has allowed the American Indian culture to be exploited because

When the British fought in the French and Indian War it put them in great debt. In order to get out of the enormous debt they taxed the colonies. The reactions of the colonists were sometimes harsh. They argued they had no representation in Parliament so they tarred and feathered, burned effigies, raided tax collectors, and boycotted British goods. Some of the acts they passed were the Sugar and Coercive Acts. They both angered the colonists tremendously. The Acts passed by the British caused tensions and many reactions from the colonists.

What we learn from this excerpt about the protestors is that they were everyday blue collar workers that were provoked by the occupation of the British army in their colony and the crippling tax policies imposed on them. Most protestors were hardworking young men who demonstrated their aggression because of the crushing pressure of the British presence at the shipyard and ports. Another thing we learn is that the colonist on the following Friday before March 5 took their anger out and started a confrontation with British soldiers. The main reason for protest was the Stamp Act, which was a tax imposed on all paper documents and the Townshend Act, which imposed duties on glass, lead, paints, paper, and tea. The protestors just wanted their

Since gaining Independence in 1776, the United States has been a nation of compromise. Compromising on issues such as the Great Compromise, determining how many seats each state will receive in Congress; the ⅗ Compromise stating that slaves count as ⅗ of a person, and the Compromise of 1820 which annexed Missouri into the country as a slave state, and Maine entered as a free state. However, the Compromise of 1820 would be one of the last compromises made for decades, as compromising no longer seemed possible. Compromising was no longer an option because new states were constantly being added, leading to violence, the country would be divided, and there were radicals on both sides.

Although there were times where the soldiers would freeze in their huts and starve due to lack of supplies (Document C), if I were a solider in the American Continental Army I would have re-enlisted. Deciding this decision as of right now was hard, so for the soldiers that did choose to quit actually during the revolution, I completely understand because there were hard times (Valley Forge Mini- Q).I would have re-enlisted because as a Patriot quitting and giving up the duty of being a solider would be one of the most terrible mistakes I would have made my whole life. One quote that really helped me to decide my decision to if I would have quit or re-enlisted in the American Continental Army was a quote that Nathan Hale was credited for saying and that quote was “I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my Country” that quote

I concur that the headliner that prompted the War of 1812 could have been ascribed to the Napoleonic Wars in the middle of France and Britain, the America lack of bias, the bar of the high oceans by Royal Navy, US Embargo and exchange bans, and inconvenience inside of the Federalists and the Republicans in the US Congress. The contention built up the validity of the youthful United States among different countries. England's thrashing at the 1781 Battle of Yorktown denoted the finish of the American Revolution and the start of new difficulties for another country. Not by any means three decades after the marking of the Treaty of Paris, which formalized Britain's acknowledgment of the United States of America, the two nations were again in strife.

The Mexican-American War or The United States Invasion as the Mexicans call it, helped add to the dream of Manifest Destiny which was the idea of the United States gaining all land on the American continent.

In this document the author writes about how the Cherokees wrote to the honorable senate and house of representatives of the United States Of America. In the letter it talks about how the people from the Cherokee Nation felt and questioning why would someone take their place were they always lived and had their own culture. The one who wrote this letter to the senate and house of representatives states that when they step to dry land they first met the red man who was first ignorant and savage, but he still received them kindly and let them rest their weary feet. One of the major argument is that the author writes about how the Cherokees or all Indians were once living a traditional life in their land that their fathers have left for them