preview

The Island Of Kora

Better Essays

In the story of The Island of “Kora”, the island had been devastated by a violent earthquake that had been triggered by a volcano eruption four years earlier. The island which had prior to the disaster been about twenty square miles in size and been reduced to less than a fourth that size to about four square miles. The island prior to the earthquakes had previously been able to support comfortably 850 to 900 people. It was a peaceful island where the inhabitants got along well. Because of the disasters the lives of the inhabitants had been changed forever.

The aftermath left by the disaster has left the conditions on the island rather bleak. If something isn’t done quickly conditions will continue to deteriorate and the resulting …show more content…

But the facts by themselves don’t tell us everything; they only tell us what the current conditions are. Having a plan that will resolve the moral issues requires a plan that will appeal to the values of the people.

So given the current situation on the Island of Kora, which ethical theory should we use? Normative, meta-ethical, deontological, teleological, ethical egoism, Kant’s formalism theory, divine command theory, hedonism, or situational ethics, which one would be the most appropriate one to use? Looking at each one we find some that are totally inappropriate for the situation and others had have some merit. Normative ethics would have a practical value in this situation because assesses what behaviors and moral standards ought to be permitted and not allowed. It would provide the guidelines or ground rules for the basis of our decision making. Examples of normative ethical standards would be the Ten Commandments found in Exodus 20 of the Bible which say you should not lie, cheat, steal, or kill. It also talks about respecting not only your family, but also your neighbor, which is everyone on the island (Ussery, 2002, n.p.).

Meta-ethics considers the questions of moral language. Metaethics unlike normative ethics that looks at the act or characteristic of right and wrong, it looks at right and wrong more by implications of what is the nature of good and bad. Metaethics tends to ask the questions of what are the difference

Get Access