preview

In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance

Best Essays

Part I:
James Stacey Taylor's article, "In Praise of Big Brother: Why We Should Learn to Stop Worrying and Love Government Surveillance" begins reviewing the concept of "Big Brother" as it was originally presented in George Orwell's 1984. The Big Brother started off as a fictional character in 1984-- a dictator of Oceania within a totalitarian state. Set within a society in which everyone is under complete surveillance by the authorities, mainly by telescreens, the people are constantly reminded of this by the phrase “Big Brother is watching you” (Wikipedia) . Taylor goes on to explain some examples of recent surveillance technology and how it is applied in lives today. An interesting note and comparison between today’s technology and …show more content…

This only reaffirms his thesis that the “State should place all of its citizens under surveillance at all times and in all places, including their offices, classrooms, shops – and even their bedrooms” (227). To support his conclusion and to quell alarms at the notion of constant surveillance, Taylor reiterates the point that, “in certain circumstances, it is morally permissible for the Stat to secure information about past events” (228). He gives a few criminal trial examples to saturate this claim, such as the State being morally permitted to compel witnesses to testify about past events; however, if the State can only use hindsight to decide what information it is morally permitted to have access to, becoming clear only after the fact what is relevant to solve a crime or judging mitigating circumstances. This brings his argument full circle, showing a situation in which the State could use preemptively gathered information through surveillance retroactively, making it morally preferable to one State where it did not have constant surveillance. Taylor also supports his argument by explaining how it is compatible with both a rights-based and a consequentialism approach to ethics (228). I will develop this further in Part II.

Part II:

Taylor outlines and thoroughly discusses four main objections to his argument. The

Get Access