preview

In Light Of Aristotle's Analysis Of Virtue

Good Essays

1. In light of Aristotle’s analysis of virtue and/or Plato’s analysis of virtue, what would be, in your view, four core Canadian moral virtues? Give a short explanation for your choices Aristotle describes moral virtue as being the mean of extreme shortage or extreme abundance. It is not usually taught but appears through a person’s habit. A virtuous person lives by the doctrine of the mean. The mean in this case is the balance all the actions that can be done or feelings that can be felt by a person. The first Canadian moral virtue is kindness. Kindness is something that is seen in almost every Canadian. Whether it be by holding the door open for strangers or being courteous to everyone they meet, this virtue is thoroughly expressed. Secondly, …show more content…

Explain with your own original examples, Aristotle’s doctrine of the four causes.
The four causes that Aristotle mentions are the material cause, the formal cause, the efficient cause, and, lastly, the final cause. Each cause helps to answer the question “Why?” in different forms. The material cause is the raw substance that forms an object or a thing. It is the essence of the product and without it the product would not be available. An example of this can be the material cause for a blanket. Cotton is used to make it and because of this, it is the essence of the product. The formal cause gives reason as to why a certain material is what it is. Without form, a ball of cotton could not be a blanket. Someone cannot compare a blanket with gathered cotton because it is not the same thing even though both materials are cotton. The efficient cause is the answer to what did that. Something that causes change or stability is the efficient cause. The blanket is made by a person interweaving the cotton is the source of change. The final cause is supposed to answer why this material exists or was made. In the example of the blanket, it was constructed with the idea to keep the person wearing it …show more content…

The purpose of this doctrine is to teach people that extremes need to be avoided when it comes to virtue. It can have a negative effect on a person if they are furious or if they are incredibly happy. Both can cloud a person’s judgment and cause something bad to happen. That’s why according to the doctrine being calm is the mean. Finding and achieving the mean is also relative. People experience and see things differently because of a number of reasons. Environmental factors, upbringing, and just a person’s biological wiring affects what the mean is. The doctrine also suggests that a person that is truly virtuous never act within the extremes and always avoids being in that position. However, reaching this place where a person is not inclined to act out takes a lot of instruction and teaching one’s self. If a person who was truly virtuous was to get into a car accident instead of being overcome by anger or happiness that he is alive, he would internalize all the natural emotions brought up and present and calm demeanor. When he is able to conquer his urges or expressing emotions that lie at the extremes, it is possible to say that he is truly

Get Access