How well policy met stated goals
The complete goals of pensions reform in New Jersey focus primarily on three key areas: (1) funding, (2) benefit levels, and (3) collective bargaining rights. The first completely failed and last two were accomplished.
The funding issue remains in New Jersey concerning the Pension plan. Unable to work together to reform an ailing state pension system that faces a $170 billion deficit. The budget committees of the Democratic-controlled Senate and Assembly approved a budget plan this year that would raise taxes on businesses and millionaires to add $1.8 billion to the state’s pension contribution for the fiscal year that begins July 1 (Watchdog.org). The proposal would increase the state’s total payment to $3.1 billion next year, the amount originally required by statute. But the state Supreme Court ruled that law unconstitutional earlier this month, allowing the Governor to legally slash the pension payment to $1.3 billion for next year (Watchdog.org.). In essence, to change the pension reforms agreements when deemed necessary.
The latest reform would specifically, create a “millionaire’s tax” on incomes over $1 million a year. The levy would raise $688 million, according to an estimate by the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services (Watchdog.org). In addition, a one-year, 15 percent surcharge on the state corporate income tax, which would produce another $435 million in revenues to fix the shortfall from failing to adhere to the
The New Economic Policy (NEP) was a measure implemented in order to counter the arguably disastrous effects War Communism. The New Economic is controversial. Some historians argue it allowed the Soviet economy to solidify and begin to recover, and also allowed the Bolsheviks to retain control over Russia. Others, like Orlando Figes, state it was ultimately a failure, arguing that under the NEP the peasants grew away from the Bolshevik regime, inviting a future, and brutal, reassertion of central control.s This essay will discuss the effectiveness of the NEP economically and politically as well as outlining War Communism and why it failed
In the department of Health and Welfare, the new government had developed a national contributory pension plan that was based on the Liberal campaign promises. (English, 284-285)
Patient access to affordable health care is an ongoing issue in the United States. The first portion of the policy process involves three different stages, the formulation stage, legislative stage, and the implementation stage. Three main stages exist in the process to transform a topic into a policy (Morone, J. A., Litman, T. J., & Robins, L.S., 2008). Coupled with the implementation stage is an evaluation of all the stages to determine effectiveness and gather information for use in future public health care policy making. In the formulation stage, the ideas, concepts, and information steam from this process of policy making. The
The Clearview Township is a suburban community of 25,000 individuals. Bill Harper, the newly appointed manager of the Clearview Township. Mr. Harper had made some very fruitful recommendations: The financing of all future capital improvements in cash during the fiscal year in which the work would be done, would be considered a great idea considering the state of the community’s finances. One thing that may hinder this plan would depend on the form in which the community accepts the increase in taxes. This would and could also result negatively with the community during the next upcoming election. Individuals in a community would not vote for an individual that has raised their taxes and not increases services offered in the community.
Well why exactly does New Jersey want something that they didn’t in 1993? The answer is money. With sports betting, New Jersey could regulate this, tapping into the ever growing activity which could nets around 150 billion a year. Injecting such into a
In contrast to this plan would be the New Jersey plan which proposed representation by the state no matter the population.
It proposed more power to the states, and the federal government to hold little power. This was quickly dismissed by those who wanted a strong federal government. The nationalists were able to convince those in favor of the New Jersey plan that any new legislation would be in direct relation to what the people wanted (Bruns, 1986).
In recent years our newspapers, televisions, and radios have been inundated with news stories about sexual offenders and sexual predators. Stories such as the kidnapping and murder of Polly Klass, Carlie Brucia, Amber Hagerman, and Jessica Lunsford have shocked the nation. Sex offenders and predators commit despicable acts; however, their acts seem more despicable when they are committed upon the most venerable members of our society, our children. Even with the new Jessica Lunsford legislation in Florida some citizens feel that it is not enough to keep their communities safe. Many cities are now looking at limiting the areas in which sex offenders and predators can live in hopes of protecting children. Many
Criminal justice policy over the past 50 has evolved. The key issues of criminal justice policies were gangs, drugs, juvenile, root causes of crime, and gun control. Currently, the key issues are terrorism, illegal immigration, and global organized crime. Traditionally, criminal justice policies were issued by state and local governments. However, the federal government plays an important role in implementation of criminal justice policy. The federal government provides grants to local and state governments to support these criminal justice policies. Criminal justice agencies
The solution to this daunting problem was to tax businesses. Payments to current retirees are financed by a payroll on current workers wages’ half directly as a payroll tax and half paid by the employer” (SCHC). “Congress” implemented strategically taking money from financial stable workers and their weather employer to give money to the elderly and physically impaired without hurting the financial stability of those taxed individuals. The government saw an opening for improvement with in their national support and took it for the betterment of the nation. The act also protects the and gives states money to support “unemployment insurance, aid to families with dependent children, maternal and child welfare, public health insurance, and blind services” (SCHC). The act expands on just the elderly receiving government assistance but all groups who can not provide for them selves due to uncontrollable circumstances that where originally caused by the governments neglect and the start of the great depression.
As mentioned by Thompson (2010), in the Associated Press, “Lawmakers bridged a $19 billion shortfall, more than 20 percent of the $87.5 billion general fund spending plan”. This shows that the state was heading towards a financial crisis and more deficit creation. Moreover, Thompson (2010), in the Associated Press also points out that “It includes no tax or fee increases but uses a combination of cuts, funding shifts, delayed corporate tax breaks and assumptions about money the state hopes to receive”. The budget gave rise to other dependent costs such as delayed tax refunds. It was uncertain that the State will receive the required funds from the federal government to ensure that the important programs will function the way it used to be until the funds are received.
All in all, the New Jersey Plan called for equal representation in which each state had the same number of representatives. The New Jersey Plan also called for Separation of Powers consisting of legislative, executive, and judicial branches which means everyone (including small states and large states) was treated equally. The New Jersey plan wants equality among the states, no matter what the
New Jersey like many other states relies on a tax system to provide many different services to its citizens including schools, roads, public health, and safety. Correspondingly, it has to raise the money required to
The article “Good Policy and Good Politics” from the U.S News is supports our argument that economic impact is an important factor in influencing immigrant policy. According to the author, Stan Veuger, president Obama’s decision to offer illegal immigrants reprieve from deportation will result in an increase labor force which in turn will increase U.S GDP and its production output. An estimated .4 percent of GDP will increase after 10 years if the president’s policy goes into effect. Also, according to Stan Veuger the incoming immigrants will take the jobs that are suited for them “without too much of a harmful impact on native workers”. Stan Veuger’s use of the word “good” to describe president Obama’s proposal shows where the author stands
The Government Performance and Results Act was signed into law in 1993. It was made it to improve government performance management. The act is being used to set goals, measure results, and report any progress being shown in agencies. On January 4 of 2011, the president of the United States Barack Obama signed the new Government Performance and Results Act. The new Act fixed some of the weaknesses that were found in the act that was signed in 1993. The act helps agencies focus on the priorities that they should be focusing on. “The new approach is more useful for planning and reporting.” (performance.gov) New goals are set for the agencies at the end of the fiscal years for the next year. When the Results Act first came out, the president knew that it would not be completely effective the first year, so he ran a pilot.