The Mongols were not and possibly have never been barbaric. Cruel, yes but never savages. They were a community who was disciplined, who had laws, and who had control of a great army. The Mongols showed discipline by listening to their king’s every word and following his every instruction. In Document 2, we were able to read about how the Mongols were organized a certain way by their king and had to face punishment if they were to go against it. The Mongols in every battle had stayed put instead of running away or else they’d be executed. Document 5 shows us an image of some Mongols being faced upside down and are about to have an arrow shot through them. The reason being for this is that they had apparently went against the laws set for them. Setting laws and getting punished for breaking them shows how the Mongols were forced to stay in line or stay disciplined. Genghis Khan had created laws to keep his people in check. Document 10 shows us some examples of the laws Mongols had to follow and some even told us of the consequences they might faced if the law is to be broken. The Mongols had a law stating that they were allowed to get drunk only three times a month, any more than that and they’d be guilty of …show more content…
(Document 1) The Mongols had great battle tactics and the were and overall great army. Document 4 had explained in just how long it took for the Mongols to conquer a Persian city, Nishapur. This shows us how great the army was exactly and just how fast it took for them to conquer a city with three thousand crossbows waiting in action. Document 3 is written about the battle tactics of the Mongols. It gave us a very detailed explanation on what it looks like before they start the battle and what it looks like after, and the ending just so happens to be the Mongols taking control. The Mongols were a ruthless army who basically won every war and
There have been many historians and just regular people that take one look at the Mongols and just assume right away that they were ruthless barbarians that killed anyone in their way or without the same beliefs. But if you take a closer look is that still true? No. The mongols were in fact not barbaric but in turn were civilized. Although some people will still make the argument even after that closer look that Mongols were uncivilized monsters. I see where that is a valid point, but with their understanding ways and their clever techniques, we should admire them, not put shame on them for being barbaric when they weren’t.
Throughout the 13th century world, the Mongols constantly showed displays of continuous violence, drinking, brutality and unfair treatment. They were considered to be savages, and people who lived far beyond what we would know as a “civilized world.” They single handedly became one of, if not the most powerful empires to have existed, building their empire through violent and barbaric manors. The Mongols were very barbaric people, for they portrayed many inhumane and mannerless actions while their empire lasted, causing death destruction and the downfall of all of the land they took over.
In the 13 century, a small tribe from the steppes of central Asia conquered much of the Middle East and Eastern Europe. The tribe was known as the Mongol warriors. The Mongols were ruthless and very barbaric. While the Mongols conquered many countries they didn’t care who they hurt.Even though they did benefit some of the areas that they conquered, they did too many bad things that overpowered the good things. Their law was very confusing and in some parts it was unreasonable. They would torture survivors and they conquered more land than any of the greatest world conquest. As ruthless as the Mongols could be, to my surprise they were quite organized as a union. In documents 2 and 3 it talks about how the army should be organized and how they
Although the Mongols were sometimes very brutal they were not barbarians. The Mongols were able to come up with very complex battle tactics like no other military in their era. In document three “ History of the Mongols” recorded by John of Plano Carpini he, states “they make figures of men and set them on horses. They do this
They were ruthless and gory. The people of Nishapur, a city in Persia felt the raft of the Mongols. History shows that, “The Mongols now descended from the walls and began to slay and plunder… They then drove all the survivors, men and women, out onto the plain; and … it was commanded that the town should be laid waste … not even cats and dogs should be left alive”(Doc 4). This is where their barbaric qualities really begin to show. They killed all of the people in Nishapur. They did not want one single living, breathing thing to be alive. The Mongols had very strict army rules. History shows that, “... Two or three or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of a hundred are all put to death, if they do not flee too”(Doc 2). In the Mongols’ eyes, the army was supposed to be one. They wanted everyone in a group to fight at the same time. If they did not get their way the group was executed. Even if one whole group of ten flees, ninety others are killed for no reason. They did not have any associations with the fleeing otherwise they would have left too. Many innocent lives were taken by the Mongols. Now one could say they were just trying to survive, however they took innocent people’s lives. Innocent people do not stand in the way of survival. They were gory and cold people. They were very barbaric with their rules and
The Mongols were barbaric they way they treat other it wasn’t fair.John of Plano Carpini explains in Carpini on Battle Tactics telling that they will kill the people who were overweight they will used that fat and melt it to make them into a fair ball they believed the fat of fireball was inextinguishable(Document 3).Also John of Plano Carpini say in the military if few people ran way the people in that group will put to death but if one group decide to ran away the rest of the groups will put to death(Document 2). It's not fair that
Those who did not do their job as a soldier were to be killed and because of this rule, the Mongols were excessively cruel. Stated in Document 2, “In a word, unless they retreat in a body, all who take flight are put to death.” Soldiers who fled in battle were to be put to death. Those who were not brave enough to engage in combat and took flight were to be terminated because they did not have the courage to risk their life. This piece of evidence further proves why the
The Mongols were one of the most treacherous and fearful groups in the 13th century CE, creating an empire that was not to be messed with. They used threats and techniques that no other tribe dare use, making them come off as ferocious. Even today, they have been remembered as a savage and barbaric tribe; although some disagree at this point. Based on documents 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7, it can be concluded that although most other empires were fiercely savage, the Mongolians were the most barbaric out of them all. An additional document that could be used would be evidence of how the Mongols didn’t always use violence to conquer land.
The Mongols were nomadic peoples who conquered a great portion of the world since its first great leader Genghis Khan, with not only unbelievable violence and destruction, but also incredible intelligence and organization. Most civilizations that came into contact with the Mongols considered them to be “barbarians” because of their violently powerful society. The Mongol were not completely civilized as they were mostly illiterate and still had complete nomadic customs, and were very ruthless and violent peoples, thus making them “barbarians”.
Barbarians simply meant foreigners. By the 1200 “barbarian” was a much more negative term referring to people who lived beyond the reach of civilization, people who were savage, evil. The Mongols were barbaric with the amount of land they conquered, laws, and punishments. The barbarians were barbaric in many different ways.
But it's believed that they were not. The definition of barbaric is being brutal or uncivil. But, the Mongols
The end goal of evolving an empire dominated by the Mongol’s was all Genghis Kahn strived for, ever since he was little. Khan believed that since he had a blood clot on his hand when he was born, his destiny was to become a leader (history.com) An army of 20,000 Mongolian warriors were first united by Genghis at the age of 20 (Genghis Kahn Biography). Cavalry attacks were his specialty. Intense training with horses and numerous weapons took place to gain more knowledge (history.com). Eventually skill began to evolve. Mongol’s signature strategy included having both hands free on
To begin with, the Mongols in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries were brilliant warriors who always kept their goals in focus. The Mongol empire should be described as fierce, their advantage
In the early 13th Century an impressive and terrifying force was spreading over half the known world. Atop the backs of horses the Mongols brought down large empires with their military conquest and innovative conquest. The Mongolians started their empire as a collection of nomadic tribes struggling for supremacy. Little did they know but major kingdoms across the world were about to experience a dark age. Over the course of the Mongolian conquest the innovation in war, commerce, and diplomatic circles would change the world forever. China, Western Europe, Russia, and the Middle East were all targets for the Mongolian Empire during their short time as an almost unstoppable force. Following great leaders ranging from Chinggis, Kublai, and Ogedei the story of the Mongolian empire is one of conquest and supremacy. The Mongolian Empire was an important culture that changed the face of the world.
The Mongols were first off very brutal people whose only focuses were to kill people to get what they wanted, land. One reason why the Mongols were so brutal was because their brutal leaders who told them what to do and go for. According to the background essay on the Mongols “Numerous chinese cities fell, including where Mongol slaughter was so great the streets were said to be greasy with flesh.” This was all done under the leadership of Genghis Khan who launched this army. Therefore, Khan led this army