preview

Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

Decent Essays

I believe that the bombing of Hiroshima was not a diplomatic measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post Second-World War era rather than a strictly military measure designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. I don’t believe it is in America’s nature to not only bomb a city, but to completely level it, just to intimidate an entirely different country. America’s goal was the total and utter surrender of Japan. Not to intimidate Soviet Union.

Yes, America had plan many tactical strategies to deal with Japan, things such as, air bombings, H.E.’s, incendiary bombs, raiding, sea blockades, and air blockades. However, most Americans only focus on the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb was not even created to use against Japanese. Before what most countries and their citizens recognize as the beginning of World War II (September 1, 1939), in the earlier part of 1939, the scientific community had found out that Soviet Union had discovered how to split …show more content…

President Truman gave a radio address in August of 1945 saying, “Having found the bomb, we have used it. We have used it against those who attacked Pearl Harbor… We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans. We shall continue to use it until we completely destroy Japan’s power to make war. Only a Japanese surrender will stop us.” This statement says nothing at all about Soviet Union or intimidating Soviet Union. So how could The United States decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima be a diplomatic measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union in the post Second-World War era rather than a strictly military measure designated to force Japan’s unconditional surrender? The dropping of the atomic bomb was a way to ensure Japan’s surrender and a speedy way to end the

Get Access