preview

Headgear Inc Case Study

Decent Essays

Evaluation of HeadGear, Inc. Learning Team 8: Sebastiano Mangiafico, Fredy Quintero, Zain Shahid, and Patricia Wood University of Central Florida ACG6425 June 28, 2012 Evaluation of HeadGear, Inc. HeadGear, Inc is a small manufacturer of headphones for use in commercial and personal applications. In recent times, the demand for headphones has grown steadily; however, the company’s profits have grown at a slower rate. John Hurley, the chief executive officer (CEO), is concerned about the falling productivity and increasing costs. John is aware that if the profits continue to decline, the result can negatively affect the stock price of the company. A decline in stock prices will hinder the firm's ability to raise new investment …show more content…

Ethical Issues Even though a business has an economic need to make a profit to stay in business, companies also have a social and ethical responsibility to the stakeholders served. Ethical dilemmas can result from an employee choosing between making a decision in the best interest of an organization compared to making a decision based on a personal agenda. Enron is an example of a business that crossed ethical boundaries for stakeholder agendas by using innovative accounting to falsify the financial earnings of the company that eventually destroyed the company. One of the ethical issues demonstrated by the new COO was his adoption of the absorption-costing model. With the increase of manufacturing units from 120,000 units in 2002 to 175,000 units in 2003, the use of absorption costing allowed the per unit fixed manufacturing overhead cost to decrease in 2003 as compared to 2002. The following shows the comparison between using absorption and variable costing models when calculating the total cost of sales and the operating income. | | Because the absorption-costing model only deducts the fixed manufacturing overhead costs for units sold in the current period, the COO was able to show an increase in profits between 2002 and 2003. What the COO failed to report to the stakeholders on the 2003 income statement was the outstanding fixed manufacturing overhead costs for the remaining 35,000 units

Get Access