preview

Graffiti Is Bad

Decent Essays

Graffiti: A force for evil
Graffiti refers to pictures or words inscribed on public property. It has been around for thousands of years found in caves to modern buildings. However, several people argue whether modern graffiti is a force representing good or evil. Graffiti is a negative method of portraying “art” due to the fact that it negatively affects people within a community and the community itself, it consumes a lot of a cities’ economy, and it is not necessary for it to be produced on public property.
Teenagers and young adults abuse graffiti which negatively impacts a community and the people living within it, and here is how. According to the Los Angeles Police Department, “young adults...damage property for reasons of boredom, anger or revenge. Others vandalize to show defiance toward rules, laws and authority or to draw attention to a ‘cause’.”(6) In other words, teenagers are wrongly influenced by graffiti and become rebellious towards the law and high authorities. In addition, graffiti …show more content…

However, it is not necessary for people to deface public property. There are alternative resources such as canvases in which people may produce their art. According to Noel Sanchez, “Artists tag both public and private property, which becomes costly for taxpayers and business and property owners” (Graffiti as Vandalism). As seen here, paint is being sprayed on public and private property which negatively affects the taxpayers. In addition, not even art institutions such as the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles or the Museum of the City of New York find graffiti attractive on their property and prohibit their premises to be vandalized (Graffiti is Always Vandalism). This proves that even art museums would not consider graffiti attractive if their own property was covered in it, therefore suggesting that graffiti ruins

Get Access