ANALYSIS REPORT FOR A PROSPECTIVE SHAREHOLDER
Terms of Reference 1. To determine whether Ted Baker is worth investing into 2. To compare financial ratios over the last five years 3. To identify problem areas and good signs for investment
I will then come to a clear conclusion about Ted Baker’s financial performance and make an informed recommendation to a potential shareholder.
INTRODUCTION
The report was requested by a potential shareholder,
Will be analyzing the liquidity and efficiency ratio (short term solvency), because it is important for the potential shareholder to know the ability of Ted Baker to meet its short term financial commitments and how it utilizes its recourses.
My ratio comparisons will be
…show more content…
Ideally it should be between 1 and 2. A figure less than 1 indicates that the company did not have enough cash, for example in 2009 with a ratio of 0.82. according to Ted Baker’s web site (http://www.tedbakerplc.com) They had a major business expansion, they spent £11.8 million in 2009 to open up thirty two (32) new stores compared to£1.5 million in 2008 when they opened twenty three (23) , such expansion does not come cheap. There was unpaid royalty income by Hartmax Corporation which was one of the licensed outlets in America which filled for bankruptcy on 23rd January 2009 before the group income statement came out at the end of January. (Ted Baker Report 2009-2010 page 8). On the whole the ratios have been consistent in the last five years. After the 2009 down turn in the figures, management took action by controlling costs and commitments.
Uncertain economic climate also contributed to the 2009 down turn, however Ted baker managed to overcome the difficult environment.
Hence the increase of their profit 2010 (see appendix Group Income Statement for the 52 weeks ended 29 January 2010)
In comparison to the current ratio, which was a round 2.25 and the quick ration at 1, the difference is very small. They have both been static. This shows that the company’s current assets are not dependant on the inventory. Management is in control of the finances.
3 FIXED ASSET TURNOVER RATIO
This gives a rough measure of the
The liquidity of firm can be measured by computing certain ratio’s such as current ratio and acid ratio. For measuring Target Corporation’s 2014 liquidity; the firm’s current ratio and the acid ratio is computed. The company’s current ratio is 0.91 times which is computed by comparing current asset ($11, 573,000) with current liabilities ($12,777, 000) of the year 2014 (TGT Company Financial, n.d). The firm’s acid ratio is 0.26 times which is computed by deducting inventory ($8,278,000) from current assets. The inventory is deducted from current assets because the company has not received any money for the unfinished good or from unsold inventory worth ($8,278,000). To analyze the Target Corporation’s liquidity trend in 2014; the current ratio and acid ratio of 2014 is compared with the 2015’s ratios. In 2015, the firm’s current ratio was 1.20 times and the acid ratio was 0.45 times. These liquidity ratios reflect that the firm’s liquidity was better in 2015 than 2014. (See Table 1).
Total profit show a positive increase from 18% in 2013 to 31% in 2015, far reaching the brothers’ preference of $1.1 M in 2015, Appendix 3 showed $1.4 M net profit
The following report is a brief comparative analysis of two of Australia’s largest deposit-taking financial institutions (FI), Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. (ANZ) and Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac). This report seeks to identify which of the FIs has a greater aggregate return per dollar of equity and thus establish the highest performer, or most profitable, of the two. The Return on Equity Model (ROE) (Koch & MacDonald,
The return on shareholders’ fund, capital employed, total assets all have gone down during this period. The ability of the company to pay its short term debt hasn’t varied much, but the administrative expenses have gone up by a very large amount.
This ratio is similar to current ratio, except that it excludes inventory from current assets. Inventory is subtracted because it is considered to be less liquid than other current assets, that is, it cannot be easily used to pay for the company’s current liabilities. A company having a quick ratio of at least 1.0, is considered to be financially stable. It has sufficient liquid assets and hence, it will be able to pay back its debts easily (Qasim Saleem et al., 2011).
Review of Financial Research Report: This assignment is an analysis of a US publicly-traded company; its common stock could be a prospective investment. The report is due in Week 10, in needs to be at least 5 pages, and it needs to cover the following topics:
Liquidity ratio. The firm’s liquidity shows a downward trend through time. The current ratio is decreasing because the growth in current liabilities outpaces the growth of current assets. The quick ratio is also declining but not as fast as the current ratio. From 1991 to 1992, it only decreased 0.35 units while the current ratio decreased 0.93 units. Looking at the common size balance sheet, we also see that the percentage of inventory is growing from 33% to 48% indicating Mark X could not convert its inventory to cash.
From your analysis of research materials, examine the company and provide a report on the short and long range financial problems that are evident from the review. If you find no short or long range financial problems, provide the evidence to justify this conclusion.
This report is going to analyse and evaluate the Ted Baker plc. by providing the most important ratios of the company and interpretations to them. Furthermore, it is going to recommend to hold shares of this company to existing shareholders and also recommend potential investors to purchase the shares of Ted Baker plc. since the return of the company is expected to be high in the nearest future.
This paper will seek to analyze the financial statements of the O.M Scott & Sons Company during the years 1957-1961, in order to provide readers with a thorough understanding of the various factors that may influence the future success of this business. Additionally, recommendations based on an analysis of their financial
In comparing the companies to each other it is important to take into account the liquidity or ability of a firm to meet its current obligations, and solvency
Before beginning an analysis of a company it is necessary to have a complete set of financial statements, preferably for the pas few years so that historical trends can be obtained. Ratios are a way for anyone to get an idea of the financial performance of a company by using the information contained in the financial statements. Ratios are grouped into four basic categories, liquidity, activity, profitability, and financial leverage. This document will use a variety of these ratios to analyze the firm, Sample Company, as of December 31,2000.
In year 2007 quick ratio reached dangerous point – 1,02, company’s ability to pay its short-term obligations was badly influenced by the increase in short-term liabilities In 2008 meaning of the ratio grew up, because of the factors listed above. In year 2009 both ratios fell, since company took more liabilities than in 2008: its short-term borrowings, current tax and short-term provisions increased Average showings on AstraZeneca Quick ratio during the period was 1,13, while GSK – 1,22 which again proves that GSK was more liquid during the analysed period.
Financial results and conditions vary among companies for a number of reasons. One reason for the variation can be traced to the characteristics of the industries in which companies operate. For example, some industries require large investments in property, plant, and equipment (PP&E), while others require very little. In some industries, the competitive productpricing structure permits companies to earn significant profits per sales dollar, while in other industries the product-pricing structure imposes a much lower profit margin. In most low-margin industries, however, companies often experience a relatively high rate of product throughput. A second reason for some of the
The long-term liquidity risk ratio such as LT debt/Equity, D/E, and Total Liabilities to Total Assets all show a decline from year 2005 due to the repayment of debts. The interest coverage ratio also shows a healthy number of 29.45 in comparison to the industrial average of 15.04 indicating a high ability to pay out its interest expense. Such a low relative risk is not surprising due to the nature of its business depending heavily in R&D development and large intangible assets.