1.) Teachers are required to uphold a certain code of ethics, created by the:
a. American Federation of Teachers
*b. National Education Association
c. International Society for Teaching in Education
d. National Teachers Association
Pg: 42 Reasoning: The teacher’s code of ethics were created by the National Education Association. This code of ethics covers three major areas; including relationships with students, professional responsibilities, and relationships with other teachers or parents.
Knowledge: This is the basic recall of a fact.
2.) One concern of those that do not support an increased federal influence on education is that politicians would use schools as a a means to further their own political agenda.
*a. True
b. False
Pg: 57
…show more content…
However, the fact that she is only in her second year of teaching and has a teacher mentor tells us that she is in the induction years.
Application: Applying the concept of professional development phases to a real life situation.
5.) You are asked to participate in a session where teachers in your district are brought together to discuss their opinions and ideas on effectively incorporating technology in the classroom. You and other teachers provide examples of how they were able to engage students using everything from computer games, to youtube. This effort would be referred to as what?
a. a department meeting
b. part of the pretraining phase
c. part of the formal preparation phase
*d. In-service education
Pg: 38-39 Reasoning: In-service education is a form of continuing education, often funded by the school district. These programs consist of workshops, guest speakers, and “share” sessions. A share session, as described in the question, consists of teachers coming together to share ideas, techniques, and materials.
Comprehension: Understanding the meaning of in-service education, and being able to recognize it in a different
Within all this, it is essential that the teacher establishes and maintains professional boundaries. These can be varied and quite different, depending on the context, the environment and the group or individual being taught, for example, a teacher teaching young children would have a different set of boundaries than a football coach coaching an adult football team. However, the teacher should always consider relevant legislation. This includes health and safety legislation such as the Health and Safety at Work Act, 1974; the Equality Act, 2010 and most relevant to the above example, child protection
Some things change, some things stay the same. The National Education Association (NEA) adopted a code of ethics in 1975 (Strike & Soltis 2009, p. viii). While this code still upholds many concerns that educators face today, it is important to make sure that a code of ethics is a breathing document. It must adapt and change with the changing of time. Strike and Soltis (2009) reference the code of ethics quite regularly throughout the entire book. It is first introduced in full at the beginning of the book. Looking over the code, it is important to remember that much has changed since it was first adopted. While all of the code still applies, it is necessary to add to the code to make it acceptable for the twenty-first century.
The Alabama Code of Ethics explicitly describes the behavior of professional teachers. The content supplies a set of guidelines for moral conduct. The Code of Ethics are in place to protect students and teachers. Some modes of unethical conduct are highlighted throughout that warrant disciplinary action.
The NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct was developed to uphold the application of core values, ideals, and principles to assist teachers’ decision-making about ethical issues. The Core Values of the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct is based on the foundation of the field's commitment to young children. It is noteworthy that all seven of the Code's Core Values directly address our commitment to children:
Professional Development measures the degree to which teachers value continuous personal development and school-wide improvement.
The North Carolina Code of Ethics can be described as a constitution for fellow educators. The purpose of the North Carolina Code of Ethics is to guarantee a secure, honest, and professional environment for both students and teachers. As the Code of Ethics states, “The educator strives to maintain the respect and confidence of colleagues, students, parents and legal guardians, and the community, and to serve as an appropriate role model”.
The Florida code of ethics are designed to set boundaries for teachers to follow, most are common knowledge such as not judging students because of sex, age, or race. The point of these rules are to ensure a safe, effective, and welcoming experience at school. The fact of the matter is that public school is a place already a lot of student do not really want to be in for their own personal reasons; not everyone enjoys learning. These rules are to help make the experience for students better as they move through their education career. Teaching is not an easy job, nor is it something anyone can do, but it is rewarding and beneficial to all those in society. There is no greater wealth than the wealth of knowledge, an educator, one
As school leaders, we have to hold the public trust and so ethics are such an important part what we do in our school. I think there are a few simple rules and one of them is always to think about what is the best benefit for our students. Our ultimate goal is to provide a safe learning environment where students are willing to learn and improve. If we keep this in our mind, we can hardly go wrong with an ethical question that we face. Ethical challenges need to be confronted with courage and compassion for those who would be impacted by difficult decisions. School leaders are responsible for setting the examples that others would wish to follow.
There are five propositions that the National Board for Professional Teacher Standards has listed, which are Proposition 1: Teachers are Committed to Students and Their Learning, Proposition 2: Teachers Know the Subjects They Teach and How to Teach Those Subjects to Students, Proposition 3: Teachers are Responsible for Managing and Monitoring Student Learning, Proposition 4: Teachers Think Systematically about Their Practice and Learn from Experience, and Proposition 5: Teachers are Members of Learning Communities. The five propositions are similar to the code of ethics that are set up for teachers. The first proposition discusses the commitment that teachers are to have for their students learning. It’s main focus is that the student are treated equally and they are given the chance to learn. The National Board for Professional Teacher Standards (1987) stated “They believe all students can learn”. This statement is very crucial for teachers to understand, because if we give up on our students they will eventually give up on themselves. Proposition two discusses how teachers must know their content and how to deliver their content. Knowing your content is a must when you are a teacher, but if you don’t know how to deliver the information to your students you are back at square one. This proposition wants the teachers to be a master of the concepts being taught, and understand the information on a real-world basis. Also the teacher must be able to fill the gap of
Yes I agreed with the authors that a code of ethics should do more than establish minimum acceptable standards. As noted that, ethical behavior in any profession is about making correct judgment or decision that are based on established code of ethics. Businesses always drive the behavior that is expected in an organization. Successful businesses try to build high ethical culture from the top management level to the lowest and setting the standards for acceptable and unacceptable conduct in an organization.
I participated in service learning at Fraser school in Richfield. Starting in September I helped out in a toddler age classroom every Thursday. Fraser school is a preschool setting for infants and toddlers. Besides getting the children kindergarten ready and offering a somewhat typical day of daycare/school, Fraser offers occupational, physical, and speech therapy. Some of the children have disabilities and some do not, Fraser is not discriminatory and they provide care for anyone. Some of the things I did in the classroom were prepare snack and lunch for the children, play games, participate in art projects, music, and reading, and play games with the children. The two teachers really appreciated my help, as I was provided an extra hand for them while they prepared daily activities. Playtime was usually hectic for the group and it needed to be closely monitored. I was also able to keep the children safe and keep a close eye on the total of twelve toddlers during playtime. My experiences at Fraser helped me understand many topics we talked about in our Intro to Sociology class. A few topics that stood out to me the most were the idea of social integration and many of the functions of the education system, the three stages in the development of self, institutional discrimination with minority and group divisions.
The Alaska Code of Ethics for teachers contain many points that deal with normative and applied ethics. I drew this conclusion because many of the topics within the code lead to things that explain how things should be done or if situations arise, it explains how they should be handled. These more general ideas provide a framework, which grounds these ethics (Moral Philosophy, 2009). From there the Alaska Code of Ethics spirals down to more specific terms and situations. This is when the code gets into more applied ethics (Moral Philosophy, 2009). The Alaska Code of Ethics seems to speak to the personal values and morals of those for whom they are intended. This can be seen in many of the codes such as, ?The educator may not engage in physical abuse of a student or sexual conduct with a student and shall report to the commission knowledge of such an act by an educator? (Alaska Department of Education & Early Learning, 2000). This is just one example of how Alaska?s code asks educators to abide not only by the professional code of ethics, but to also base their actions and judgments on their personal values and ethics. Teachers, in their responsibility to society, must work in order to not betray that trust (Nelson, Palonsky, & McCarthy, 2010). The knowledge of this responsibility is obvious throughout the Alaska Code of Ethics.
A code of ethics is a document that every profession agrees to abide by, it lets the public know that a profession is serving the public in a good way, and the services is going to be acceptable moral conduct. A code of ethics permits a profession to speak with a knowledgeable voice. It provides support for behaving in a justify way when there is pressure or temptation to do what is quickest or what will make people admire us. The reason early childhood educators should follow a code of ethics because they have a daily influence on the lives of children, teachers are held to high expectations. As an early childhood educator every child should to be treated fairly and receive the same services as any other child. A lot of things can happen
After reviewing this week’s WebQuest, I have learned that teachers have a Code of Ethics to follow. I knew that they had some sort of system in place to follow, but I did not know what all it entailed. I am a substitute teacher. I have been to several schools within the school district that I sub for and have not once seen the Teacher’s Code of Ethics posted. I think that it is just as important to post the teacher’s code of ethics, as it is rules for students to follow. The Teacher’s Code of Ethics can be posted in the Teacher’s Lounge, restrooms, and/or conference room(s). It needs to be posted for teachers and subs to see as a friendly reminder of what is expected. I know that most districts include Teacher’s Code of Ethics in their
As a group we did not meet outside the class, but we are planning to do so in order to work on our group presentation.