preview

Economics Of Prohibition

Decent Essays

Overall, prohibition did reduce alcohol consumption, but only to those who actually drank responsibly in the U.S.. Yet, thanks to the economics of prohibitions, the harm done from alcohol abuse was made worse. Hospitalizations and violent crimes related to alcohol soared, corruption was created in politics and law enforcement, caused a greatness of immorality, along with disrespect of religion and the law. Over burdened the penal system, harmed people financially and physically, and prevented the treatment of problems. A great social critic named H.L.
Mencken wrote in 1924, “Five years of Prohibition have had, at least, this one benign effect: they have completely disposed of all the favourite arguments of the Prohibitionists. None of the great boons and usufructs that were to follow the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment has come to pass. There is not less drunkenness in the Republic, but more. There is not less crime, but more. There is not less insanity, but more. The cost of government is not smaller, but vastly greater. Respect for law has not increased, but diminished.” (quote …show more content…

With all else, prohibition failed. Its purpose to limit corruption and to clean up social problems backfired and suddenly made life a lot harder. In the present, alcohol is legal and over 18 million people in the United States of America abuse alcohol. This includes people under the age of 21. Research from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism states that by age 15, 33 percent of teens have had at least one drink and by age 18, 60 percent of teens have had one drink. Adolescents who ages range from 12-20 often binge drink and although teens drink less than adults, whenever teens do drink, they drink

Get Access