Article 91 covers insubordinate conduct towards warrant officer, NCO, or PO. This is broken down rather heavily throughout the article covering as many bases and loopholes as possible it seems. After reading the article I have realized that not only did I disregard or fall under two of the categories in the article but I fall under two of the first three. The first one that I fell under was “treats with contempt or is disrespectful in language or deportment toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer while that officer is in the execution of his office.” Regardless of what I assumed the situation to be I stepped out of line when I proceeded to call Corporal Delorge a “jackass”. Not only is it being disrespectful in …show more content…
The second way that I fell into violation of article 91 was willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer. To make matters worse for myself I disobeyed a lawful order given out by a noncommissioned officer as a repercussion to my first transgression. I could have more than likely completely avoided the paperwork and documentation of me disrespecting a NCO by merely dropping down and doing pushups when he told me to after verbally disrespecting him by calling him a jackass. So not only did I disrespecting said NCO with obscene language I also did it by disobeying the order following thereafter. But no, being the disrespectful and disobedient private that I am I instead looked away as if there order to get down was not heard. Yes this escalated matters even further. One must learn from his mistakes and take something from every situation whether negative or positive this situation being completely negative leaves more to be interpreted and applied to life than most. What I’ve learned from the buildup and negative development in this situation is that regardless of how you think a situation is going listen and obey all orders given. If you think something is a joke go along with it if it is coming from one of your superiors because it could be more serious than you
Police officers are faced each day with a variety of situation in which they must deal; therefore we should ask ourselves the following questions: Should police officers enforce the law equally in all situations? In what situations should police officers be allowed to not enforce the law? What types of situations would they be required to fully enforce the law? Why does police discretion exist? What are its strengths and weaknesses? And what is the relationship between police discretion and police ethics?
Being late does not make one important. Tardiness is a very unattractive quality when it comes to most aspects of one’s life: family functions, meetings, interviews, and especially a job. While a family may forgive tardiness, a job will not. Being late once or twice in one’s life is unavoidable. Being consistently tardy makes one unreliable and shows a lack of respect for other people’s time and obligations. Being late tells others that one person can be waited on, while everyone else can’t. People do not like when their feelings were not taken into consideration, when they took the time to consider others.
Correctional Officer’s have been around for a very long time and were designed to keep major offenders off the street after they have been arrested by the Police. The offenders are put in a holding cell at a Pre Trial Centre awaiting their court date.
(5) That, under the circumstances, the behavior or language was disrespectful to that commissioned officer.
On 20 May 2016 I Sgt Barth, J was assigned to Core Services as the desk sergeant and as part of my assigned duties was monitoring dinner feeding. I witnessed C/O Patronas directing Inmate Hamilton 1104472 to dump his cup of water. Inmate Hamilton refused three directed orders to dump his cup but also proceeded to drink his water with in arms reach of C/O Patronas to which it seemed to me that he was doing this to antagonize him. C/O Patronas proceeded to take the cup out of his hand and dump it for him. C/O Patronas then told Inmate Hamilton to move out of his personal space and move on with his unit. Inmate Hamilton agained refuse three direct orders. Inmate Hamilton then proceeded to look at C/O Patronas as if he was going to challenge
Within a few days I was flying to COP Speicher, in Tikrit, Iraq to meet with my military appointed attorney. I spoke with this Captain for several hours trying to figure out why I became charged with a crime that I most certainly did not do. I was informed that Corrales had been charged with the same crime, I still could not figure out why this was happening to me. I had done the right thing, I informed my chain of command and told them exactly what I had done. My attorney met with the units Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) and work out a plea deal for me. My attorney told me that the SJA was willing to except my plea of guilty and that I would only have to serve eight years. I immediately told her that was not an option. I did not do what
2. On 26 January 2015, an Army Regulation 15-6 Informal Investigation found that you violated Articles 128 and 133 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The investigation substantiated that you failed to treat your subordinates with respect and fairness, and that you also assault two of your subordinates in your command. As a result of these findings, Major General Richard D. Clark has recommended that your Meritorious Service Medal be revoked.
The applicant further contends that there was undue command influence to initiate punishment and he was given a general officer memorandum of reprimand, months later he received an Article 15, and was administrative
So the next day I discussed the issue with my division officer who totally wanted to wait another day to revisit the issue in a discussion with the principal assistant. I briefed him on that we’re going to see the department head and call a meeting with the, command and us to discuss this. His concerns were the ramifications from the principal assistant I stated “I will deal it.” So I went to the department head’s office and requested a meeting with command to discuss. His first response was can we discuss it before the principal assistant gets in the office my reply, “Sir I would like all parties involved in the meeting first.” The department head called the principal assistant to a meeting who had no clue was about to happen. During the meeting the principal assistance was obviously disappointed he had no clue what I was about to
They went further on to inform us that only a pretrial would be taking place, since a new information being submitted by a correctional officer was to be debated as to whether it was substantial enough to be admitted as evidence.
Officer Owes, who was assigned as Control OIC, came out of the control’s bathroom and answered the phone; however, no one responded. Approximately a minute later LT. Lewars came to the control window in a threaten manner, yelling and stated “You guys are not doing your job; Why didn’t you answer the phone”. I proceeded to explain to LT. Lewars that I was on the phone announcing the compound was close and Officer Owes was on the bathroom. LT. Lewars then stated “Keep it up and I will have you pull out of control”.
One morning as I left the mess hall, I heard yelling. A recruit was running on the road in front of the company mess. A very angry NCO was running next to him pointing out how slow he was going. He was calling him a little ‘Nancy boy,’ as he grabbed the back of the recruit’s head. With a quick motion, this recruit went face first into the gravel lining the road’s edge. This was a clear violation of military code. I did not know what happened to the NCO or the recruit, as I was not contacted, nor I did not report it. Bullies always had better reach than I did, even in the
For the record I’ll read the pertinent parts of the memo. It is alleged you conducted yourself in a disrespectful manner in the workplace, via your work email, violating Department’s Employee Conduct Policy and Procedure (02.01.020), Department’s Use of State Telephones, Fax Machines, Computers Policy and Procedure and the Statewide Personal Use of Office Technology Policy. Specifically, on July 22 20, 2016 you used foul and derogatory language towards a police officer using your State email account.
Staff sergeant Ivana Preach, you have accomplished a great deal over the last few years. You have managed to complete all two hundred and fifty-four core tasks, including the twenty-five seven-level specific tasks. You graduated from Airman Leadership School six months ago and completed your seven-level career development course soon after. Currently you are assigned to quality assurance office which requires your oversight for fifteen offices. Your actions as a noncommissioned officer have not gone unnoticed. Recently you earned Noncommissioned Officer of the Quarter. You were credited for the flawless implementation of the operational readiness training course. Based on our conversations and your actions, I believe your preferred cognitive
In 2012, I received a Non-Judicial Punishment, Article 92, Failure to Obey Lawful Order, Standard Operating Procedure violation while serving as a Drill Instructor (DI) at MCRD San Diego. My offense, I developed a friendship with a recruit in the Recruit Separations Platoon awaiting to be released back into the civilian sector. Although, in a recruit status, this was not the traditional DI/ recruit relationship. I had a lapse in judgment due to personal issues and I borrowed money in the amount of $300. After realizing the mistake made, I immediately returned the funds in full with the same bills I was originally given. Thus, I was awarded 21 days’ restriction and forfeiture of pay of borrowed amount. This experience humbled me. I quickly learned