Differences Between Royal Governors And Colonial Governors

As generations grew up in America, nationalism within the colonies grew towards their new country. These settlers slowly lost their patriotic tie to Great Britain and it’s ruler, King George III. So when the French and Indian War ended in America, and the indebted England needed some compensation from American settlers in the form of taxes, the colonists questioned the authority of England and their ability to rule them. British imperial policies such as the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Townshend Tea Tax caused uproar within the colonies against British rule without

Although American colonists always tried to negotiate the contentious policies which contradicted their principles with the British Parliament, the crown did not leave much room for the discussion fueling the Anglo-American debate with a stubborn constitutional position; with a ridiculous notion as virtual representation; with a large British army that limited the economic development of the country; with the unjust acts that forced to shell out revenues from the colonies;

The period between 1763 and 1776 was a time where many areas of disagreement developed between the colonists and the British policy makers. The major areas of disagreement were caused by the British rules imposed on the colonies that prevented expansion, imposed taxation and limited colonial liberty. The first dispute was right after the Seven Years War (1756-1763) with the Proclamation of 1763. According to ushistory.org, the colonists, after the war, felt entitled and excited to begin settling westward, but the Proclamation prohibited such expansion. The war also put a large debt burden on Britain and in attempts to alleviate the debt they imposed many different taxes upon the colonists. The colonists did not believe they should be required

The American colonists and British policymakers disagreed on many things, but the common thread that seems to run through them all is the sense of exploitation on the part of the colonists and the perceived need to protect overall interests on the part of the British policymakers. The Sugar Act of 1764, The Currency Act of 1764, and the Stamp Acts are but a few examples of the disagreements between the legislators and the colonies.

British officials caused angry colonists. Laws like the Sugar Act, Stamp Act, and Tea Act made colonists stand up and resist. British believed the Parliament makes the decisions, but because of the location, difference rules were hard to inforce. The lust for power to control the colonies was very strong but they were not going to keep letting it happen.

Imagine soldiers staying in your home, and everything being taxed, this was how the colonists lived. Even though they might’ve not liked it, it was for their safety. All the king wanted to do was help the colonists, but they eventually needed to pay the expenses that were do. Despite the colonists living across the sea the king still had authority over them. The king helped them with the French and Indian War.

The colonists had many opposing attitudes towards Great Britain prior to and during the Revolutionary War. Some of these attitudes began to surface as early as the Seven Year War. When Great Britain began to try to recoup the cost of the Seven Year War, as well as support the new territories gained from the war as well as the old ones (5.4). After numerous costly encounters with the Indians in the newly acquired territory, Britain issued a proclamation. Proclamation Line of 1763 restricted the settlement of any territory past the Appalachian Mountains. This act was an effort to end the expensive conflicts that the Crown had to pay for (5.5). The act enraged settlers that had hoped to gain rich farmland after the Seven Year War and to help improve themselves economically (5.5). Many turned to attacking property and not paying taxes to taking over courthouses and harassing local officials (5.6). An uprising was beginning. Instead of having conflict among themselves, the colonists began to unite and turn on the authorities. As the colonists united, they came together on different issues from impressment of colonial men into the Navy to quartering troops (5.7). With the distance between the Colonies and Great Britain and the prosperity from colonial trade, Parliament often turned a blind eye to the colonies. Smuggling was often ignored as long as the Crown was prospering still. Due to the distance, Parliament also allowed local government make decisions for the colonies (5.9).

When the colonies were initially created, English ruled over them. The sole purpose of the colonies from the English perspective was to improve England, which was considered “the motherland”. The English fought in the Seven Years War and defeated the French, but they had to find a way to pay off their war debt. The colonies were becoming more profitable, and the English noticed this. Consequently, the English began to put taxes on the colonies without the colonies having any representation. The colonists opposed this, but they still debated on whether to fight for independence or to continue with British guidance.

There are several reasons why colonists were angered by the actions of Britain. The main idea is that colonists believed Britain could not tax them without their representation in Parliament. Because of this, the colonists slowly started to disconnect from Britain.

1. The disagreement between England and the colonies is the colonies believed that since they were a part of England they should be respected too and should not pay taxes. The colonists opposed the taxes being added. The colonists felt England was not doing good to their colonies.

This angered colonists because they had no representation in Parliament, meaning they were forced to do whatever the King ordered at this point.

During this period of time, Britain was a very influential world power, but all too often they abused this power. The colonists that had been sent from Europe knew first hand what it was like to be taken advantage of by the British Parliament. These colonists had spent years creating an infrastructure for future generations and were enraged when King George III sent out unjust acts over the colonies. Neither George III nor the Parliament had a right to force their hand over the colonies. First of all, the colonies did not have adequate representation in Parliament. Next, the colonists did not all originate Britain. Lastly, the colonists had been extremely isolated from Britain, so they had to learn to fend for themselves. Even though Britain

“In 1770, as it had done in 1765, Parliament retreated from violent confrontation, repealing all of the obnoxious duties except that on tea…” The various taxes enacted by the British Parliament had the effect of slowly disgruntling the colonial populace by infringing on their right to buy whatever luxury goods were on the market. Added to that effect, the way the various colonies were not able to represent themselves or send out any type of grievance to Parliament. With that in mind it is important to note the colonial American consumer need for imported goods provided an overwhelming desire for readily made goods and that consumer element made a transition to the political and public sphere. That resentment and being ignored by the royal government steadily escalated the colonists into action and against Great Britain. This was no more apparent than in newspapers, many colonists used aliases when responding to public discourse in newspapers and see their writings everywhere in the colonies. Therefore, those colonists that could read can also make their own thoughts about what to do in the colonies with their relationship to Great Britain. In time, that resentment boiled over into conflict over ideas of liberty and independence, economic

The thirteen colonies that became the USA were originally colonies of Great Britain. By the time the American Revolution took place, the citizens of these colonies were beginning to get tired of the British rule. Rebellion and discontent were rampant. For those people who see the change in the American government and society a real Revolution, the Revolution is essentially an economic one. The main reason the colonies started rebelling against 'mother England' was the taxation issue. The colonies debated England's legal power to tax them and, furthermore, did not wish to be taxed without representation. This was one of the main causes of the Revolutionary War. The Revenue Act of 1764 made the constitutional issue of whether or not the King had the right to tax the thirteen colonies an issue, and this eventually "became an entering wedge in the great dispute that was finally to wrest the American colonies from England" (Olsen, 6). It was the phrase 'taxation without representation' "that was to draw many to the cause of the American patriots against the mother country" (6).

To begin with, Tensions rose when Britain enforced taxes to the colonies without representation. Parliament first enacted the stamp act in order to raise revenue. The stamp act imposed taxes on numerous goods creating turmoil. The Colonists believed that parliament only had power to charge taxes on trade, not for the sole reason of paying debt, in document 2. This is important because it was the first act of many that imposed taxes on various paper items. In turn, the colonies consolidated together to form the Sons of Liberty resistance group to fight for their rights. Many protest were formed and turmoil arose between Britain and the colonies. Also, The colonies were unfairly taxed and were not given their own “consent.” In document 10, the people believed that given uncircumstantial taxes was a violation to their rights. Also, when the colonies disagreed with their orders, they were brought to court and