Observe: What are some of the significant differences Carr identifies between reading books and reading online? Carr identifies how reading a book is different from reading online because when you read online, you don’t think deeply about what it is you’re reading, and you don’t have to concentrate nearly as much. Carr also mentions that the Internet is something people find themselves going to more often than books because it is more time efficient. Identifying patterns: Make a list of the benefits and negative effects of the Internet that Carr identifies. On which side does Carr seem to provide more examples and supporting evidence? A huge beneficial effect of the Internet is time-efficiency because it no longer takes days to find research. Fortunately, it only takes a couple of minutes to do a few Google searches. Another benefit to the Internet, in comparison to the last example, is that it is a channel for most of the world’s information. For Carr, as for others, the Internet is becoming a universal medium. Lastly, it is probable that we may be doing more reading today than we did in the 1970s or 1980s, when television was a choice of interest. It is assumed that we may do more reading today because not only do we have access to a variety of texts, but also a numerous amount of ways of communicating. For example, social media accounts and text-messaging. A negative effect of the Internet is that it is chipping away capacity for contemplation. The Internet is
With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer
The author then noted the positive ways the Internet has influenced his life. yet, when he states, “But that boon comes at a price,” his tone immediately changes from appreciative to concerned. This change in tone shows that Carr is beginning to dive deeper into his topic. Additionally, his positive section acts as a counterargument.
Carr mentions his personal experience with technology and how it has affected him. He points out his “concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages” (961). Carr isn’t the only one who has been affected by technology; he tells us that even his “acquaintances” have had similar experiences. His acquaintances say, “The more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing” (962). What once used to come natural to us has become difficult. People used to rely on books for multiple reasons when it came to research but now that technology has been used more frequently books are not that common. Carr says “Research that once required days . . . can be done in minutes” (962). Carr is mentioning the benefits of the Internet, for his argument he is using both sides so that the reader can relate to his article and understand where he is coming from. Carr quotes Marshall McLuhan when he points out that “the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation” (962). Although fast research is great and easy to access it has its flaws. Carr mentions that
He says in paragraph five, “Whether I’m online or not, my mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it.” This shows that Carr knows what the internet has done to make a difference when reading a book.
Finally, Carr uses logical arguments to support his idea that the internet is too distracting for people to be productive. Although some parts of his article Carr references experiments and opinions of scientists, not all of his arguments need such references because they are just logical arguments. For example, he talks about how people who go online while at work are less productive is a logical argument that makes sense and therefore doesn’t need a source for that argument. Or that the sounds of messages and emails popping up on someone’s computer can get someone unfocused. Carr has uses phrases like “It’s hardly surprising” in his paper to indicate that something is
“Literacy debate, Online, R U Really Reading? ”by Motoko Rich argues that the online reading skill will change the brain’s circuity, give you the main point you need to read, and help the student learning in better way. Rich using comparing and contrasting between reading online and reading of books. Rich tells us that more people would reading online instead reading in book because “you have to go through a lot of details that aren’t need in the book, but online reading give you what you need, nothing more or less.” He also describes that “online reading help children fare better when they begin looking for digital-age jobs.” Which it helps them to success in the future. Rich also argued that some student using computer at home, they would
She structures her statement on reading online by belittling it, proclaiming that websites provide more distractions for the reader. On the other hand; a book or novel provides full immersion for the reader, cutting out all distractions that may arise. Paul supports
Carr’s premise is that the Web is interfering with our ability to focus on lengthy material. On the contrary, the internet is actually aiding our ability to focus on reading. This holds true for younger children, who are known as the digital natives in our generation. In a research conducted by The National Center for Education shows that “by altering the mode of reading material from traditional paper-based reading to online reading,” the interest of elementary school children increased (Wright 367). Because children of the 21st century are surrounded by technology, they are more likely to gear towards digital media for their mode of learning. Contrary to Carr’s view that the internet “is chipping away [the] capacity for concentration and contemplation,” these children are more likely to read and focus as a result of
While both includes reading one deals the web and the other with an actual book. The author fears that if "generations [continues] growing up online" they will lack the ability to understand "novels,poems,and other kinds of literature". The ones brain that was "trained to apprehend them" will be the only ones to
Another one of Carrs resources is one of his literature friends. Although this person is very well educated and highly praised in his field of study, he does not know much about the Internet and the effects it has on our minds. His statements, like the bloggers are very much opinionated. The literary scholar that says he has a tough time reading lengthy articles now is his own personal experience, not that of study and analysis.
The two opposing opinions Rich presents in her essay are the differences between reading in print and reading on the internet. she explains, that kids from this generation who have access to the Internet have more tendency to read more for fun, spend more time reading articles and commenting about what they read, but she also explain that a lot of critics show that reading online does not improve reading and many adolescence fail tests.
Additionally, the Internet has benefited the world by connecting users to billions of pieces of information from universities, libraries and databases around the world. No matter where you are in the world as long as you have internet access you can learn anything you need to know about a topic in a matter of minutes. My work on this argument is an example of how the internet is beneficial to all who use it. Without access to the internet, this would have been much more labor intensive. It would have required many evenings away from home spent in a library doing research. Instead, I was able to do all of my research from work and home, which allowed for less time away from my son.
Nowadays, there are thousands of books available free on the Internet, and people find them easy to read the book online instead of getting the hard copy of the book. In his book The Shallows, Nicholas Carr explains that the online readings make it becomes difficult for us to pay full attention to the reading “The more they use the Web, the more they have to fight to stay focused on long pieces of writing”(7). For example, when I have to read the articles from the Internet for my research papers or class assignments, I always have hard time focus on the reading because I easily get distracted by the ads shown on the pages. I start paying attention to the ads instead of understanding and absorb the information. Carr also states that “For some people, the very idea of reading a book has come to seem old-fashioned, maybe even little silly- like sewing your own shirts or butchering your own meat”(8). In these days, people find it boring to read books, especially young adults, they think it is a waste of time to read books when they can get the short versions of reading from the Internet instead of reading a page to
In my life, I have gone from reading “learn to read” books, to picture books, to children’s novels, to young adult novels, to scholarly reading and research, to adult novels, and finally to the wild wild west of the internet. When I was in those first few stages nobody was reading everything on the internet, but before I knew it, the internet and social media along with it had exploded faster than I could have ever imagined. By the time I
Internet is tools that combined everything and provided everything in a small screen.It almost has everything we need in there.Just like carr wrote in his book at page 6,“The net has become my all-purpose medium,the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind”.He also said the information of the internet is such incredibly rich and easily searched,widely described and duly applauded.Carr is telling us the internet are playing a very important character in our daily life.It’s strong enough to provide everything just by one click.And it’s incredible because it only costed 7 to 10 years. At page 8,Carr said:“Karp,Friedman,and Davis---all well-educated men with a keenness for writing---seem fairly sanguine about the decay of their faculties for reading and concentrating.”Because they said,the benefit they get from using the