0.0 Executive Summary The main purpose of this report is to analyze the corporate strategies that are essential for corporate sustainability focus of Gorilla Health Bars Pty Ltd. Additionally, it will make recommendations for future actions based on the analysis. The information is propounded on the basis of information from a range of data and information sources namely; academic journals, digital sources, books and company reports. The findings reveal that, Gorilla Health Bars has effectively taken a step towards adopting corporate strategies for sustainability focus in the competitive market of snack bars. However, as much as they have already established some initiatives to improve corporate sustainability, it has not effectively put …show more content…
Furthermore, Gorilla Health Bars (GHB) has been in operation for four years and begun making some net revenues quite recently as a result of improved public focus on healthy diet. The GHB CEO Janet Jones aims to develop the Corporate Sustainability focus of GHB Company. Moreover, she believes that a key to enhancing the reputation of GHB Company lies with better Corporate Sustainability. Furthermore, Janet hopes that, in the long run, it will help solve the problems associated with Company finances. Another problem facing GHB is that, Health bars production consumes water beyond the expected amount making water rates to shoot up in the last two years. Owing to this, Janet is keen to attempt to reduce consumption of water where possible. Finally, the CEO aims to establish some positive changes in the arrangements of the supply chain for the food products that are raw. Currently, GHB’s primary source of supply of dried tropical fruit is South Australia and Darwin. As a result, the cost of transport becomes another critical drain on the finances of the company. However, Janet argues that, despite the limited financial resources, she is willing to spend in order to provide the business with the proper operating system and appropriate Corporate Sustainability profile (Marino, 2015). The information and data sources were primarily from books, journals, records, digital sources and office records.
These expectations relate with Hungry Jack’s main stakeholders. Theory indicates that businesses affect stakeholder groups that also influence business performance in return. As such, it is essential for Hungry Jack’s to maintain and improve its corporate social responsibility strategies for the purpose of optimizing its relations with major stakeholders. By integrating the interests of these stakeholder groups in strategic formulation, Hungry Jacks can expect optimised business opportunities for long-term growth and
The company has been pioneer in field of business and also been responsible. The company has kept its objective very close to its heart and its initiative to reduce Carbon Footprint and water wastage to Zero by 2040 and Sustained source of supply for its food business by 2020 shows its commitment towards external stakeholders as well. They have been pioneer in field of business and have worked to improve its business
Sources of business information can come in a variety of different forms which include: Newspapers, Websites, Books, Posters, Directories,
Clif Bar has a few sustainable aspects in which their supply chain operates. First is that Clif Bar want to start at a low price, in order for the company to make a profits while maintain its low price, they have to find the right suppliers, co-packer and distribution center that have a relatively low cost. Moreover, Clif Bar needed the partners who have the same view as them in sustainability. They want to create a long-term business relation with those who support sustainability. Therefore, they created their brand with integrity and quality from the supplies source to the final product. Clif Bar uses organic ingredients from sustainable farmers. Their manufacture uses clean and renewable energy, while packed in an environmentally friendly
GoMacro is a family-owned company that is inspired by a whole-food based macrobiotic lifestyle. Our mission is to create and manufacture healthy organic snacks, as we believe healthy food comes hand in hand with happiness and the well-being of one another. For this reason GoMacro aims to provide our products to targeted business environments in Australia. This plan seeks to generate a significant increase in company sales and profits along with enhancing the healthy lifestyles of those all over the world. The highlights of this plan are the targeted gross margin and sales-revenue. Transitioning globally will be attainable though a proactive approach to the candidacy of customers, local growers and distributers.
The purpose of this report is to assist Gorilla Health Bars (GHB) on how it can improve the sustainability of the company to boost the company’s reputation and to make it financially sound in future. However, the corporation has inadequate finances but it is ready to spend what it has got to develop its CSR profile and working conditions. Therefore, the objective of this report is to examine the current situation of GHB and to recommend it how it can be on the path of sustainability by incorporating corporate social responsibility (CSR) into its decision making in a cost effective manner. This report contains information that has been gathered from ample data sources including company reports, academic books, published general articles
Gorilla health Bars is a food producing company situated in Victoria, Australia. It commonly produce health based snakes bars by fruit, oats, and nuts. It started its business in 2011, with old two stored building.in recent times they started to make a bit of profit and expend there business by focusing on corporate social responsibility.
In food service it is important to realize and address hot button issues within the industry to begin to understand what the target market wants, increase revenue and decrease cost centers. In researching the increasingly pressing issue of food sustainability in global food service it was discovered that implementations are initially expensive and require large amounts of dedication but are ultimately huge factors in increasing brand loyalty and recognition and gaining popularity within the “green” market segment. It was the goal of this paper to outline specific concerns posed by the issue of food sustainability as well as methods of the industry’s participation in its solutions and to analyze the progress made to increase awareness of
Nowadays, population growing so fast affected to temperature of the world are rising, the gap between poor and rich increasing, water shortages and insufficient in food supplies. To avoid negative aspects of CSR, company need to use four prevailing justification are moral obligation to make a company reliable to their stakeholder, sustainability to make a long-term objective which can be use forever, license to make a company respect to regulation and reputation to make a profit for company (Porter and Kramer, 2006). Unilever have set corporate mission goals in each decade related to those situations. In 2010-2019,
Chiquita Brands International is a multinational corporation that focuses on the distribution of bananas that are produced in several developing Latin American countries. There is a reoccurring theme of unethical behaviors in the banana industry which in return has made companies such as Chiquita to take on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). CSR has been a crucial factor for Chiquita to take attention to for a global turnaround. Important features Chiquita had to consider were obligations to ethical, social standards, legal, and environmental standards. These factors lay a major role in resolving CSR issues. Chiquita faced other problems besides CSR, for example they faced difficulties accessing trade markets in the EU. Several trade
Large companies like Coca-Cola, have always engaged in corporate social responsibilities. The objective of this paper is to determine whether or not Coca-Cola fulfilled their social responsibilities in India. Coca-Cola had launched their sustainability framework as well as adopting the international Corporate Social Responsibility the Ruggie’s framework in order to conducts its business abroad. However, things made a turn for the worst, they were accused of having pesticides in the beverages as well depletion of water to the community.
“The future depends on what we do in the present ~Mahatma Ghandi”, states Paul Polman, CEO of Unilever. In 2010 Unilever unveiled its very ambitious Unilever Sustainable Living Plan in an effort to “create a blueprint for sustainable growth” (Unilever.com). Looking forward to an achievable long range plan for growth, Unilever is approaching the plan with hopes of doubling sales through the increased efforts in sustainability. Paul Polman has been quoted stating in 2014, that in three years the company will experience a simultaneous increase in sustainability and profit growth. Profiting off of sustainability could be seen as a controversial issue. Unilever has been accused of profiting off of those less fortunate in an effort to improve the bottom line. Can Unilever’s approach to environmental improvements be seen as a strategic plan for increased sales, corporate social responsibility or both?
In recent years, Unilever and Proctor & Gamble have both taken major steps in creating a more sustainable future. They have done so through launching major corporate responsibility initiatives with the hopes of becoming more energy efficient while simultaneously increasing global quality of life. Obviously, this is no easy task and it requires reconstruction of every part of their respective companies, not just exclusive to manufacturing and distribution, but also to consumer use and disposal. The two global marketing companies have approached their corporate social responsibility initiatives in different manners, each with a unique outlook and future objectives that have both similarities and differences. Unilever and Proctor & Gamble differ in the way in which they help those in desperate need across the globe. Unilever adopted a method of “Partner to Win”, which was the idea that strategic partnerships with governments and NGOs would enhance efforts to increase sustainability and quality of life. Some of the most notable NGOs Unilever is partnered with include UNICEF, Save the Children, and Rainforest Alliance (Bartlett). These organizations were instrumental in developing strategies for Unilever’s Sustainable Living Plan. As opposed to strategic partnerships with NGOs, Proctor & Gamble has a rich history in giving back to the communities they work in through their own corporately developed programs. Their main corporate
Although McDonald’s do work very intensively with CSR, with their core value being “Committed to our people”, the company mainly consists of independent franchises. For this reason, even though the company has its’ own CSR, they are not able to “prescribe CSR & sustainability solutions for them”.
Executive summary presents a clear vision of the report with different titles. After we identify an existing company, which is Nestle, Bangladesh. In our report we mainly deal with the new product line and deigned the packaging and leveling of the fruit juice. This report will help us to determine the in-depth information and stand out position in the market.