Company A and company B are two completely different companies and now they are merging together. They have been competitors for years and the HR job will be very crucial. When it comes to informing employees about this new decision that has been made, it is important not to overwhelm them with a lot of information. There are some things that they need to know, but they don’t need to know everything. Company A comes from Mobile, Alabama which has a population around 200,000 and company B is from San Francisco, California that has around 900,000 people. This is a big difference and relocating people from these two companies will be quite a challenge. New company are willing to invest money in relocation but it needs to be a way of how to …show more content…
The benefit of older people working with younger would be very important. That is what should be explained to the employees. Older people have experience and younger people have fresh knowledge, innovations, and will bring fresh energy .That is what makes it great whenever two generations work together. Of course, some conflict can happen because of age difference but there are a lot of ways to overcome age difference. It is going to be very important to be tolerant in these situations, especially at the beginning until everybody gets used to it the change. The goals that the company has to relocate the people and to pay for all the expenses for relocation because they do not want to hire people locally they want to bring their own employees. The employees need to understand that the merge of these two company is very beneficial for the future. In order for this new company, that is mixed up from two previous rival companies, in order for this to work they must relocate some of the workers. They will have to find a way to work together. The hardest thing for HR would be to force people to move and relocate and not end up losing them because they are a big part of the organization. First of all, they will have to start explaining people why the move would be beneficial for them. In this case, the company is expecting that someone in his 50s move to San Francisco, California and that someone in his late 20s and early 30s move to
Because of things like low underpasses or weight-restricted roads, you may need to stop and find an entirely different route to your new home. If you have a personal car, you'll also have to figure out how to best transport it to your new home. When you hire a moving company, they'll work all that out for you. Instead of finding someone to drive your car or towing it along, you'll be able to drive it
Finally, make sure your move is organized. Even if it takes some effort throughout the process, it is important that you stay organized and understand what is going on. Keep organized notes and create a filing system that helps you find information and items you need with
In conclusion, it is quite clear that the only way these two companies would be successful in a merger, would be through common goals. Apparently, the main goal of the two corporations was employee happiness and a sense of peace. The leaders of the corporations were the ones responsible for the sharp and considerate decisions to create the positive outcome.
The principle issue between ages is a matter of would they be able to carry out the employment. People from other periods in life might not be particularly over intrigue by finding out about new viewpoints or methods for doing things. Another obstruction is the measure of progress that between generational blending at the workplace carries with it. Numerous individuals oppose change, feeling significantly happier with leaving things the way they are. An assorted quality of any sort frequently brings
When information is shared between the two companies it makes the whole organization better. Utilizing programs to show how effectively the company is operating can help show areas of concern. These can be accessed and addressed in a timely fashion . Because each side would like for the company to thrive, they work together . During this merger roles of the employees / department should be clearly defined . As with anything the lack if knowledge or understanding is what cause failure. As I have started before knowing when employees are aware of their roles and how to do them effectively thing run much more smoothly and are done to standard. (work by rote) .when the employee fails to understand the organization Does as well . While it s the employees job to stay well informed it is also up to management that these things be made clear. During a merger the by learning different ways of comp,eying task employees learn and management s able to vine up with new techniques.
Relocating is an exciting time, developing possibilities to start fresh as well as reinvent your life. But whether you're moving on your own or uprooting your whole family members, relocating provides a variety of stress-causing difficulties. Remaining arranged and preparing ahead will be your finest armor versus the moving blues. Reduce your change with several of these professional company ideas:
Poor Communication: The executive staff of each company needs to communicate to their employees the reason for the merger, what is expected from the merger, and the intentions of the executive staff as it relates to the merger (Siegenthaler, 2010). Employees involved in the merger need to know that they are needed and not expendable because of the merger.
In particular, communicating a strong message of unity to our newly acquired employees is paramount. I propose that we get senior management form the small company to reassure those employees that they will fit in after the merger. These managers are better equipped to deal with these individuals’ feelings and personalities. Furthermore, a company event such as a retreat, or social gathering is advised, so that employees from both companies can meet and perhaps exchange ideas, and get to know one another. Once the merger has taken place it is crucial that all management continue to meet with our employees and display an open, caring organization that is concerned with their well-being.
The opposite can also be true, where an older group of workers have been introduced to one or more new younger workers, and the older team of workers, feel that that the younger workers are inexperienced and fear the new skills introduced into the group could replace them. Thus, the older workers refuse to provide or share their experience. Age diversity can be averted if all members of the age diverse group can be educated in diversity and the negative effects that could influence their actions. The aspects that could be positive for the age diverse group, is mentoring, where the older workers mentor the younger workers and pass on their skills, experience and knowledge, and the younger workers may make the introduction of newer technologies more easily accepted and used by the older workers. This of course would only happen once all members of the group can get past their fears of the negative perceptions of each other.
Two previous competing organizations are in the process of merging. The process ensuring employees are well informed about the merger is not complete. The merging workforce needs to be brought together and communicate as one organization. This serves as the next task for middle management, to unite these employees so they may form together as one workforce in one organization and dedicate themselves to the mission of the organization. To ensure that the combined staff will work together to provide quality care without remaining competitive among each other, it would best serve the interests of the organization to form a working coalition of employees to guide them in this process. Gathering members of each prior company into a coalition for the purpose of unification is in the best interest of the organization as it is a means to alleviate their competitive nature. It is also in the best interest of the employees as it is a means for them to come together and share their experiences. These members should be employees from each company who have exposed themselves as top performers and respected members of their team. An opportunity to clarify similar goals and recognize potential flaws is provided to the coalition representing both prior organizations. This process will bring the
One of the major challenges facing company B is gaining acceptance from the employees from company A due to the fact that the companies were rivals in their respective market.
When my wife and I moved our family from Seattle, Washington to Dallas, Texas we used technology in multiple different ways to plan the move and interact with the various service providers that we employed to help us along the way. I am happy to say that the move went very smoothly and I know that it would not have been as easy for us had technology support services offered by the providers we used not been as easy to use and readily available.
When the merger between the two companies was first made public, the employee had not entertained the idea of leaving his current place of employment. However, when another company shows interest in an individual’s skillset or work habits it is worth the time to evaluate ones employment options. Contemplating a decision can be an instantaneous or a lengthy process; however, the effectiveness of the decision-making depends on the information available to the decision maker. Prior to making a hasty decision, the employee should take a critical thinking approach to assess the situation, to include reviewing the advantages and risks associated with staying with current employer as well as potential outcome if he decides to seek employment elsewhere. The following topics are just a few things that the employee has to consider during the decision-making
In an ideal merger, the newly created entity pools the best features of the two merging organizations. A well planned process built on the foundations of an open, honest and consistent communication strategy can pave the way.
Planning system weaknesses: To begin with, fundamental assumptions, such as new plants, inventory carryovers, packaging trends, etc., which are used for initial sales forecast, are entirely made by corporate headquarters. However, the divisional managers assume full responsibility for the estimates they submitted to the corporate head office. As a result, they have to make efforts to increase the overall accuracy of forecast and avoid making changes in subsequent reviews of the budget. Moreover, each product line uses the same forecasting method. It is ineffective for the company to make accurate budget since factors affecting each product line are different, such as industry trends, customer preferences and so on. Lastly, instead of plant managers, the district sale managers raise the sales budgets. However, the plant managers are held accountable for this budgeted profit number, which is connected with their performance and is not controlled by them.