preview

Cat's Cradle Literary Analysis

Decent Essays

Cat’s Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut was written during the twentieth century, which was the height of industrialization and technological advancements. The common hope during this time was that science could transform the world. This novel illuminates the flaws in this kind of thinking, and by doing so, points out how our negligent use of nature's laws has created some of the greatest tragedies know to humankind. One of the most apparent themes of Cat’s cradle is dual nature of science. It can be used as a tool to for both good and evil intentions. The conflict in this story was built around people's misuse of this powerful tool. The antagonist, Felix Hoenikker, was a major contributor to the development of the atomic bomb, and, as we later find …show more content…

It caused the conflict of the story by freezing all of Earth's water, and consequently killing all life with it. The author uses imagery to describe the aftermath of ice-nine as lifeless. This relates to the theme by reminding the reader of the shadow side of scientific progression. The freezing of Earth was essentially the Hoenikkers childrens fault, as they each were given a portion of ice-nine from their father before he died. Each of the child ended up giving away each of their fractions in an effort to find happiness; Frank gave his to “Papa” Monzano, the president of San Lorenzo, to secure the position of Major General, Angela gave hers up to marry a handsome scientist, and Newt got his stolen from his girlfriend, who ended up being a spy for the Soviet Government. John, the protagonist of Cat’s Cradle, became involved with their efforts to buy happiness through the use of their father's scientific creation. He, like everyone else in the world, ended up becoming a victim of this “sensational scientific discovery.” Ice-nine can be interpreted as a symbolic representation of sciences capacity for great harm when it is combined with human carelessness and ignorance, even if it is intended for good. This leads to question whether the pursuit of science, knowledge, and truth, will really lead to a better society. Sure, these pursuits have offered better …show more content…

Many people of 20th century though, turned for truth in the logic of science. It had made many things simpler for them and had offered them a better standard of living. Even so, as Cat’s Cradle demonstrates, their is both a good and evil side to science. When it is used with careless negligence, the results of manipulating nature can be formidable. It is a tool, and must be used with respect for others. Because of this, there is ultimately a limit to the truth many people search for in this field; although we can advance through science and exploration, it doesn’t take into account human ethics and morals. It therefore doesn’t offer meaning, and it doesn’t offer happiness. One must search for those realizations from

Get Access