Boston Tea Party Dbq

The document I focused on was from the American Yawp Reader chapter 5 titled, “George R. T. Hewes, A Retrospect of the Boston Tea-party, 1834”. This article recalls George R.T. Hewes’s memories of the Boston Tea Party. On December 16th, 1773 Hewes attended a meeting to discuss how to go about protesting the Tea Act. The next day, they ended up dumping three ships full of tea into the Boston Harbor which is now known as the Boston Tea Party. Alongside other protestors they each destroyed every ounce of tea they found and stopped anyone who tried to sneak some for themselves. This only took about 3 hours to complete. After completing this mission, the protesters all went back to their separate lives without a conversing with a single

You might think that the Boston Tea Party was just some irregular people dumping tea in the sea. But, actually it was a protest about the awful taxes that were put on the British tea. So, a group of patriots called the Sons of Liberty decided to dump the tea into the Boston Harbor. The Sons of Liberty and colonists wanted to prove a point that the taxes were atrocious and the British’s taxes on the tea were stealing their business. They indeed dumped tea into the sea, but the whole point was to protest the British and their taxes. The Sons of Liberty were the people who did the tea dumping process and the tea

It was the Tea Act. This act stated that only the British East India Company could sell or transport tea. Members of parliament passed this act because many of them had stakes in the company. At the time the British India Company was going bankrupt. This act threatened all colonial businesses by creating a monopoly. In Boston, the colonists devised a plan to resist this act. Several colonists dressed as Indians to deceive the British. These colonists seized the imported tea and dumped it into the harbor. The colonists dubbed this “the tea party.” The British responded to these actions by creating four acts jointly called the Coercive Acts. These acts closed the Boston ports to all trade, increased power of Massachusetts governor, granted trials of royal officials in Massachusetts be tried elsewhere, and allowed the new governor rights to quarter his troops anywhere. These Coercive Acts only angered the colonists more. They have strengthened their non-importation of British goods. They have also begun the forming of local militia companies.

In the novel, Defiance of the Patriots: The Boston Tea Party and the Making of America, the author Benjamin L. Carp gives an incredibly in-depth description of the events of the Boston tea party. In the Introduction, Carp argues that the “party” was not a singular event, but rather a catalyst for the impending Revolution. He presents each chapter as a new aspect of the event while offering primary sources, letters, newspapers, and magazines as compelling evidence. Each chapter is focused on a very specific topic and perfectly leads to the next. Carp gives the reader a concise layout of context, causes, proceedings, and the aftermath of this rebellious show of resolve and determination. By giving the reader the political and cultural

The Boston Tea Party was a political protest by the Sons of Liberty in Boston, Massachusetts on December 16, 1773. The citizens of the colonies felt cheated due to the lack of representation in Parliament which caused unfair taxes colonists could not do anything about. In their opinion, they were British citizens as well and deserved the same rights given to those back in the mother country and to not have “virtual representation” where members of Parliament were chosen to speak for those across the sea instead of an election to decide who holds their seat in office. Therefore, when a shipment of highly overpriced tea, due to taxes, docked at the harbor, the Sons of Liberty paraded in dressed as American Indians and in a matter of three hours

When we start analyzing the data we find that living in the colonies following the Boston Tea party was a difficult time for many. There were people on both sides, those who were against the act and those who were for the act and a fight against Britain. When asked by the authorities, no one would release the names of the perpetrators of the Boston Tea Party for fear of backlash. Those who were against the act also feared from those who were now actively seeking to fight against the British. “The mob held no dissent, burning homes of the most outspoken opponents and sending the dreaded tumbrel, an imitation of the Inquisition leading to the doors of citizens who dared voice support for the established government” (Unger 3). This shows a clear example of how many there were who were opposed to the actions of the rebels, yet at the same time they could not speak out in fear for their homes and families. It continues with, “Whatever the motives of the

Civil disobedience, which is when a person or a group of people protest against laws, taxes, etc. in a peaceful manner, has been displayed many times in the past. One of these instances included a memorable American event: the Boston Tea Party. During the Revolutionary War (1770s), Britain had colonization of America, commonly referred to as the Thirteen Colonies. The British East India Company, who performed commerce with Asia, were having monetary issues, so they needed to find a way to get revenue. In May 1773, Parliament passed the Tea Act, which gave the BEIC a portion of the American tea trade. However, this act did not put colonists at ease, because even the cheapest sellers could have lost business to the company (who now had better

With the establishment of the first successful English colony of Jamestown by the Virginia Company in the New World and the creation of the other thirteen original colonies during the seventeenth-century, the colonists of America were originally immigrants from Europe who sought to escape hardships whether it be religious persecution or material gain. This created regional differences between the New England colonies of the north and the Chesapeake colonies of the south. The diverse population of these colonies continued to grow and prosper while under the rule of Britain. While the colonists were European in origin, they developed a uniquely American identity that was different from the mother country due to the abundance of land and the absence of Parliamentary authority. Although the colonists failed to

Many things might have contributed to the colonist’s revolution against the British. The Boston Tea Party may have been the breaking point for Lord North and King George. What happened was the Sons of Liberty dressed as Mohawk indians and boarded the tea ships to toss the crates of tea into the sea. King George was not happy about the situation and passed a series of laws which the colonists referred to as “The Intolerable Acts.”

I personally think that the Tea Act was justified and unjustified because no one should have to pay taxes unless they are represented, but at the same time, they did end up destroying someone else’s property. There could have been other actions that could have been taken for the Tea Act. But if they were to do something else instead of what they did end up doing, it wouldn’t have had to have the consequences that happened after. On May 10, 1773, parliament passed the Tea Act, which granted the British East India Company control on the sale of Tea in the American colonies.

The massacre happened in 1770, in the middle of Boston. A mob of colonists attacked some British soldiers and the soldiers shot and killed five colonists all together. This sparked a lot of fury in the colonies. This was a perfect example of the British forces abusing their authority. Samuel Adams, a leading patriot, in The Rights of the Colonists in 1772 believed that, “The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have the law of nature for his rule.”

On December 16, 1773, American colonists disguised themselves as Mohawk Indians, and threw chests of tea into the Boston Harbor. The Boston Tea Party was an act of protest against Parliament’s Tea Act of 1773, that was passed in order to save the British East India Company from bankruptcy. After the Boston Tea Party, Britain passed a series of laws that became known as the Intolerable or Coercive Acts, so that they could punish the Massachusetts colonists for their rebellious behavior. These series of acts consisted of the Boston Port Act, Massachusetts Government Act, Administration of Justice Act, Quartering Act, and Quebec Act. With that being said, Massachusetts colonists felt outraged that Great Britain placed restrictions on their self-government

The Boston Tea Party took place on December 16, 1773. The event took place in Boston. The Boston Tea Party happened because the colonist felt like they should not have to pay taxes on British tea. It was also a response to the Tea Act. The tea act was an act placed on the colonist that only the British India Company could sell tea to them.

Oh, my dear older sister, life here is awfully terrible, we don’t have a voice or any rights towards the British. I truly believe the Boston tea party that occurred week ago was a warning to the British, that we want and deserve our freedom, and we are willing to go to any lengths to achieve, even go to war. Do you know that they closed the port of Boston, and claimed it will stay close until the tea was paid for? All committees of correspondence were forbidden, and Massachusetts was ruled by General Thomas Gage and his army.

There are many different definitions of terrorism. Encyclopedia.com defines it very broadly as “the use of violence to further a political or social cause”. (2003). Another source states “Terrorism has been described variously as both a tactic and strategy; a crime and a holy duty; a justified reaction to oppression and an inexcusable abomination” (Terrorism Research, n.d.). Our unit one lecture reminded us of the adage “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter” and pondered whether the Boston Tea Party could be viewed as an act of terrorism (Bethel University, 2017). Regardless of the exact definition one chooses to use, our nation faces a wide range of threats from those who intend to do us harm. The individuals and organizations who threaten us are as