Benefits Of Lowering The Drinking Age From 21 To 18

Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make a lot of sense in the world. Lowering the drinking age to 18 would make more sense. It would be better for the teens that drink on college campus. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because you can vote at eighteen, buy tobacco, it’ll reduce the thrill of breaking the law, evidence supports that early introduction of drinking is the safest way to reduce juvenile alcohol abuse, and college people that are not 21 drink also.

In the United States a large topic of discussion is the drinking age, should it stay at 21 or should the age be dropped. Somewhat recently the age has been changed from 18 to 21 and a lot of people want to be changed back. By 1988, all 50 U.S. states and the federal government had set the drinking age at 21 years of age, but is it time to lower the MLDA (minimum legal drinking age) to 18 years of age? Those who argue against lowering the MLDA claim that teens have yet to reach an age of maturity in which they can responsibly drink alcohol, and thus are more likely to develop binge drinking habits and endangerment of themselves and others by drinking prior to the age of 21. Those in favor of lowering the MLDA argue that the current MLDA doesn’t stop underage drinking and promotes binge drinking into private less controlled environments. Not only this, but lowering the MLDA strengthens the economy and can gradually expose people to drinking without overdoing it.

In the United States, the legal age of drinking is 21. Drinking is huge everywhere you go, some people do it for fun and celebration and some other people do it because they are stressed and need to release stress. Most people in the United States like young people binge drink when I mean “young” I mean like 18 years old young. At the age 18 many people are heading to college or just graduating high school and younger adults look forward on that beer being handed to them. When the young adults are out of high school they want to celebrate freely and just have fun and drink a beer, but guess what they can’t because they are considered underage, and they can’t buy their own beer. And banning the sale of alcohol to people under 21 is certain to encourage binge drinking. So should the legal drinking age be lowered? It can have many pros and cons on this situation. The legal drinking age should be lowered. We should lower the drinking age because it would decrease binge drinking, 18 is the legal age of adulthood, and lastly it is an enjoyable activity and is a freedom everyone should have.

Another great benefit that can be derived through lowering the drinking age is reducing the amount of trouble teenagers get into legaly for underaged drinking, and crimes directly related to it. Teens would be getting into less trouble for drinking since the age limit is lowered more of the ones that already do drink at the age of eighteen wouldn’t get in trouble for it, and it would encourage those under the age of eighteen to wait till they’re of legal age since they don’t have to wait as long to so. Even with the law saying you must be 21 or older to drink, many teenagers still do it, and because of it they get in trouble for it. Not only that but the reduced age limit would make it so teens wouldn’t acquire fake ID’s and overall showing

I don't believe that youngsters have the obligation or capacity to handle drinking while attempting to grow up and adapting new things all in the meantime. Would you have the capacity to handle everything? I feel that bringing down the base drinking age will impact more strategic alcoholism and more youngsters to misuse liquor. Bringing down the drinking age might likewise prompt more motor vehicle accidents among teenagers. If the drinking age is left where its at, then there may be less deadly mishaps than if United States brought down the Minimum Legal Drinking Age to 18. The writer of the essay, " Redefining the Problem Won't Make it Go Away", Linda Chavez, believes that, the drinking age should be left as it is, because he thinks that lowering drinking age is not a solution. Chavez say's, " Lowering the drinking age to eighteen won't solve these problems and would likely make them worse."(334). Moreover, the fact suggest that, in the 1970's 30 states brought down the drinking age, on the other hand it didn't keep going long. On the

Alcohol has been around in our country for thousands of years. The legal drinking age is twenty-one in some parts of the United States. This requirement makes it illegal for any minor to purchase alcohol or even drink it. In some states like Virginia, South Carolina, and South Dakota, the legal drinking age for beer and wine is eighteen, but liquor can not be consumed by a person until they are twenty-one. Alcohol consumption by minors is often looked down upon in our society. Maybe this should not be the case though. Our government should lower the drinking age to eighteen, because minors drink regardless of the law, there will be fewer drinking and driving fatalities, and the law states that once an individual reaches the age of eighteen,

Do you think that the drinking age in the United States should be lowered to eighteen? I’m here to tell you why I think that the age twenty-one is not an appropriate age to be able to drink in the U.S. Research says that In 2012, 36% of the nation’s young adults ages are 18 to 31 and most of the 18 year olds still live at home with their parents(Fry, Richard) this meaning that when these people are finally legal to drink they are on their own and have no idea how alcohol will react with them. If the drinking age was lowered to 18 young adults would be more likely to experience first time drinking at home with parents rather than going out and causing trouble. By the time a person is legally allowed to drink they are on their own and will not know exactly how to handle the first time being drunk, this could cause a lot of chaos if the person were to be in public and no one wants to have to witness or deal with a first time drunk.

Do you think the legal drinking age should be lowered to 18? About 29 people die under the influence every day. We could lower this number if we knew that these people were drinking. We wouldn’t have teens trying to hide the fact that they were drinking under age. The drinking age should be lowered to 18 because young adults will still be living at home and are able to learn the responsibility of drinking with their parents’ guidance, at 18 they are given many freedoms and responsibilities that it make sense to lower the age, and giving young adults a law they cannot break often times encourages them to break it anyway.

It may seem counterintuitive, but lowering the age will make kids safer. It’s like the old days of prohibition. From the suburbs, to college campuses, to inner cities kids find ways to get around to 21 year old limit. It’s so widespread it's the norm. This law has been an abysmal failure, it hasn't reduced or eliminated drinking. It has simply driven it underground, behind closed doors into the most risky and least manageable of settings. Like basements, fraternity houses, and locked dorm rooms, where kids go to hide from the law and from adults including parents who might teach them some moderation. The law has created a dangerous culture of irresponsible and reckless behavior. Unsupervised binge and extreme drinking. Kids try to perfect the art of getting drunk as fast as possible by playing drinking games, and pre gaming- downing as much

Lowering the legal drinking age will help the 18 year olds that are beginning adulthood. Because a 18 year can’t go into a bar and get drunk. Protecting them from any injuries or wrecks so it’ll keep them in a safe environment when under the consumption. But there still a caution of getting caught. Laws have driven young drinkers underground, banning an otherwise socially acceptable behavior. In a world in which many adults depend on prescription drugs to alleviate stress, depression, and other ailments, teenagers are turning to alcohol, never having learned how to drink responsibly. Lowering the drinking age can bring many adolescents back into social situations where they can experiment with alcohol under the supervision of peers and adults.

From the suburbs, to school campuses, to city streets, adolescents will find a way to get around the 21 year old limit. Alcohol has become a large part of teenager’s lives in America, despite the legal drinking limit of 21 years of age. Teenagers have resorted to sneaking alcohol around, causing unsafe drinking habits to take place, and the Lowering the legal drinking age to 18 would allow individuals to experience life as an adult, decrease unsafe drinking activity, and diminish the amount of times the law is broken.

There are multiple sides to this argument though. Some people believe the drinking age should be lowered to 18 because 18 years olds already do drink alcohol due to the law being, “...out of step with social and cultural reality.” according to Jack McCardell (Greenblatt,par.12-13). Though, seen from the perspective of Alexander Wagenaar (Greenblatt, par.14) lowering the drinking age would be disastrous because the underage drinking ages would drop to 15 through 17 year olds. He says, “The people who are advocating going down to 18, should acknowledge that they’re willing to risk an extra thousand deaths per year and double the number of injuries.”

Alcohol. Most adults drink it and it is present in the majority of history. When Prohibition was enforced the ban only stayed active from 1920 to 1933 and during that time alcohol was still sold illegally. It’s obvious to everyone that it’s not something we should drink, but that doesn’t stop people. Although, there’s debate over whether the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18. Lowering the drinking age would be terrible idea because it would interfere with brain development, increase alcohol consumption, lead to more bad behaviours later in life and also increase traffic fatalities.

Therefore, some of the pros would be that at the age of eighteen adults should have the right to make their own decisions. Allowing eighteen to twenty year old to drink alcohol with supervision would decrease the danger and unsafe driving. Accidents are most likely to happen among newly- legal drinkers. Lowering the minimum legal drinking age from twenty one to eighteen would diminish the trill of breaking the law to get a drink. The minimum legal drinking age being twenty one is largely ineffective because the majority of teens continue to consume alcohol. It is also not statically associated with lower rates of suicide, homicide, or

A big question pondered in the United States is why the legal drinking age is twenty-one. The United States people don’t understand why eighteen year old can die fighting for their country, but cannot legally drink until the age of twenty-one. If you have ever talked to someone who was born in the 1970s or earlier, they might have told you that they could legally drink under the age of twenty-one. This is true because each state is responsible for setting their own minimum legal drinking age; not the federal government. States are responsible for setting the drinking age based on the concept of federalism. Congress eventually passes the National Minimum Drinking Act of 1984. According to www.legalflip.com, the Act basically states that if you want money from the federal government that you’re entitled to for road and transportation systems, you will raise the drinking age to twenty-one years old. Some states refused to change the age, but by 1988 changed the age to twenty-one even if they didn’t want to, so they could get money from the federal government. I believe that the legal age should remain at twenty-one. A few reasons of why I believe that is because a lower drinking age would be unsafe, nine hundred lives yearly have been saved by keeping the drinking age at twenty-one, and lastly another critical reason not to lower the drinking age is the prevalence of binge drinking.